EQT Corporation
EQT Corporation (EQT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EQT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQT | $59.55 | -0.38% | 37.8B | 19.33 | $3.13 | +1.07% |
| COP | $110.03 | -1.40% | 136.6B | 17.41 | $6.35 | +2.93% |
| CNQ | $42.48 | -0.06% | 88.3B | 18.19 | $2.33 | +4.02% |
| EOG | $122.00 | -1.51% | 67.2B | 12.22 | $10.07 | +3.26% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63B | 13.33 | $20.22 | +4.06% |
| OXY | $52.45 | +1.79% | 51.1B | 38.11 | $1.36 | +1.87% |
| FANG | $174.12 | -0.35% | 50.4B | 12.32 | $14.29 | +2.27% |
| HES | $148.97 | +0.00% | 46.1B | 20.66 | $7.21 | +0.67% |
| WDS | $19.31 | +1.29% | 36.9B | 12.64 | $1.54 | +5.25% |
| TPL | $514.31 | +5.70% | 34.4B | 72.29 | $6.91 | +0.42% |
Stock Comparison
EQT vs COP Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 136.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while COP trades at $110.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check COP's competition here
EQT vs CNQ Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CNQ trades at $42.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CNQ's competition here
EQT vs EOG Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while EOG trades at $122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EOG's competition here
EQT vs PXD Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check PXD's competition here
EQT vs OXY Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while OXY trades at $52.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check OXY's competition here
EQT vs FANG Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while FANG trades at $174.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check FANG's competition here
EQT vs HES Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while HES trades at $148.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check HES's competition here
EQT vs WDS Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while WDS trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check WDS's competition here
EQT vs TPL Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while TPL trades at $514.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 72.29. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check TPL's competition here
EQT vs OXY-WT Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while OXY-WT trades at $30.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check OXY-WT's competition here
EQT vs DVN Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while DVN trades at $43.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check DVN's competition here
EQT vs EXE Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while EXE trades at $105.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EXE's competition here
EQT vs CTRA Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CTRA trades at $30.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CTRA's competition here
EQT vs COG Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check COG's competition here
EQT vs MRO Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check MRO's competition here
EQT vs PR Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while PR trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check PR's competition here
EQT vs OVV Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while OVV trades at $50.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 54.35. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check OVV's competition here
EQT vs AR Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while AR trades at $34.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check AR's competition here
EQT vs CHK Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CHK's competition here
EQT vs APA Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while APA trades at $28.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check APA's competition here
EQT vs CHKEW Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CHKEW's competition here
EQT vs RRC Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while RRC trades at $38.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check RRC's competition here
EQT vs CHKEZ Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CHKEZ's competition here
EQT vs CHKEL Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CHKEL's competition here
EQT vs SWN Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SWN's competition here
EQT vs MTDR Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while MTDR trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check MTDR's competition here
EQT vs VIST Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while VIST trades at $57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check VIST's competition here
EQT vs CHRD Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CHRD trades at $104.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CHRD's competition here
EQT vs CEO Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CEO's competition here
EQT vs CRK Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CRK trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CRK's competition here
EQT vs CNX Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CNX trades at $38.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CNX's competition here
EQT vs CPG Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CPG's competition here
EQT vs CRC Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CRC trades at $58.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CRC's competition here
EQT vs MGY Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while MGY trades at $26.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check MGY's competition here
EQT vs MUR Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while MUR trades at $33.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 46.85. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check MUR's competition here
EQT vs OAS Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check OAS's competition here
EQT vs DEN Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check DEN's competition here
EQT vs BCEI Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check BCEI's competition here
EQT vs CDEV Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CDEV's competition here
EQT vs ERF Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while ERF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check ERF's competition here
EQT vs GPOR Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while GPOR trades at $196.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is -372.67. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check GPOR's competition here
EQT vs VRN Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check VRN's competition here
EQT vs BSM Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while BSM trades at $14.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check BSM's competition here
EQT vs BKV Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while BKV trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 65.31. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check BKV's competition here
EQT vs ESTE Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check ESTE's competition here
EQT vs BTE Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while BTE trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check BTE's competition here
EQT vs NOG Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while NOG trades at $27.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NOG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check NOG's competition here
EQT vs SM Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while SM trades at $22.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 3.74. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SM's competition here
EQT vs CRGY Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CRGY trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -34.56. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CRGY's competition here
EQT vs CLMT Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CLMT trades at $27.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CLMT's competition here
EQT vs CPE Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CPE's competition here
EQT vs TALO Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while TALO trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check TALO's competition here
EQT vs CIVI Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while CIVI trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CIVI's competition here
EQT vs STRDW Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check STRDW's competition here
EQT vs VET Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while VET trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas VET's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check VET's competition here
EQT vs MNR Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while MNR trades at $13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check MNR's competition here
EQT vs KRP Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while KRP trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is -159.50. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check KRP's competition here
EQT vs HHRS Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check HHRS's competition here
EQT vs NEXT Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while NEXT trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check NEXT's competition here
EQT vs DMLP Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while DMLP trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check DMLP's competition here
EQT vs FLMN Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check FLMN's competition here
EQT vs KOS Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while KOS trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check KOS's competition here
EQT vs SBR Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while SBR trades at $70.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SBR's competition here
EQT vs SBOW Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while SBOW trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SBOW's competition here
EQT vs TELL Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check TELL's competition here
EQT vs VTS Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 879.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while VTS trades at $22.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 44.57. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VTS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check VTS's competition here
EQT vs IMPPP Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 855.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while IMPPP trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -65.80. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check IMPPP's competition here
EQT vs ROCC Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check ROCC's competition here
EQT vs TXO Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 695.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while TXO trades at $12.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is 31.73. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check TXO's competition here
EQT vs VTLE Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while VTLE trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check VTLE's competition here
EQT vs GRNT Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 686.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while GRNT trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRNT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check GRNT's competition here
EQT vs TBN Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 674.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while TBN trades at $30.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check TBN's competition here
EQT vs HPK Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 665.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while HPK trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check HPK's competition here
EQT vs SD Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 647.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while SD trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SD's competition here
EQT vs REPX Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 621.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while REPX trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check REPX's competition here
EQT vs PVAC Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check PVAC's competition here
EQT vs EGY Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 537.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while EGY trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EGY's competition here
EQT vs OBE Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 534.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while OBE trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check OBE's competition here
EQT vs GPRK Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 444.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while GPRK trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check GPRK's competition here
EQT vs GFR Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 426.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while GFR trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GFR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check GFR's competition here
EQT vs WTI Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 398.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while WTI trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WTI's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check WTI's competition here
EQT vs PNRG Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 310.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while PNRG trades at $184.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check PNRG's competition here
EQT vs REI Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 283.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while REI trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -17.12. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check REI's competition here
EQT vs INR Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 265.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while INR trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas INR's P/E ratio is -19.52. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check INR's competition here
EQT vs SJT Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 256.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while SJT trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -550.00. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SJT's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SJT's competition here
EQT vs BRY Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while BRY trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check BRY's competition here
EQT vs GTE Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while GTE trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check GTE's competition here
EQT vs AMPY Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 230.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while AMPY trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMPY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check AMPY's competition here
EQT vs PHX Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while PHX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check PHX's competition here
EQT vs EPM Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 154.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while EPM trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is 55.25. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EPM's competition here
EQT vs IMPP Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 143.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while IMPP trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check IMPP's competition here
EQT vs KGEI Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while KGEI trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check KGEI's competition here
EQT vs EPSN Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 110M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while EPSN trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EPSN's competition here
EQT vs ANNA Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while ANNA trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is -13.74. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANNA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check ANNA's competition here
EQT vs EP Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 103.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while EP trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EP's competition here
EQT vs NRT Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, NRT has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while NRT trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas NRT's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NRT's ROE of +4.58%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to NRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check NRT's competition here
EQT vs HUSA Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, HUSA has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while HUSA trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas HUSA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUSA's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to HUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check HUSA's competition here
EQT vs BATL Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, BATL has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while BATL trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas BATL's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BATL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to BATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check BATL's competition here
EQT vs INDO Comparison February 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 37.8B. In comparison, INDO has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $59.55, while INDO trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas INDO's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to INDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check INDO's competition here