EBET, Inc.
EBET, Inc. EBET Peers
See (EBET) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBET | $0.00 | -80.00% | 1.5K | N/A | -$9.96 | N/A |
| FLUT | $289.89 | +0.11% | 51.2B | 99.27 | $2.92 | N/A |
| LVS | $49.81 | -1.41% | 35.2B | 27.82 | $1.79 | +2.20% |
| DKNG | $42.98 | -3.57% | 21.3B | -52.43 | -$0.82 | N/A |
| WYNN | $111.17 | -0.68% | 11.6B | 29.72 | $3.74 | +1.12% |
| MGM | $37.93 | -2.33% | 10.3B | 16.94 | $2.24 | N/A |
| LNW | $97.59 | -3.38% | 8.2B | 26.09 | $3.74 | N/A |
| CHDN | $105.80 | -0.94% | 7.6B | 18.83 | $5.62 | +0.38% |
| BYD | $79.66 | -6.69% | 6.5B | 12.85 | $6.20 | +0.87% |
| CZR | $30.03 | -4.70% | 6.2B | -27.30 | -$1.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EBET vs FLUT Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while FLUT trades at $289.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 99.27. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLUT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs LVS Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while LVS trades at $49.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LVS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs DKNG Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while DKNG trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -52.43. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DKNG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs WYNN Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while WYNN trades at $111.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs MGM Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while MGM trades at $37.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs LNW Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while LNW trades at $97.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs CHDN Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while CHDN trades at $105.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs BYD Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while BYD trades at $79.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs CZR Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while CZR trades at $30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -27.30. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs MTN Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while MTN trades at $164.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs SGHC Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while SGHC trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 44.17. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs SGMS Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs HGV Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while HGV trades at $48.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 151.63. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs RSI Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while RSI trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 165.17. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs RRR Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while RRR trades at $56.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs IGT Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while IGT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs VAC Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while VAC trades at $83.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs PENN Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while PENN trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -29.20. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs PLYA Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET and PLYA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBET vs MCRI Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while MCRI trades at $86.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs SBET Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while SBET trades at $21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBET's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs EVRI Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs MLCO Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while MLCO trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 57.97. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs ACEL Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while ACEL trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs BVH Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs NGMS Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs GDEN Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 849.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while GDEN trades at $32.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is 73.07. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GDEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs TPGH-UN Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET and TPGH-UN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBET vs AGS Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs BALY Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 453.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while BALY trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs GAMB Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 410.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while GAMB trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GAMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs CDRO Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 381.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while CDRO trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 92.78. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CDRO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs INSE Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while INSE trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is 3.64. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INSE's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs MSC Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 231.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while MSC trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs FLL Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while FLL trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLL's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs CPHC Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 95.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while CPHC trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is 118.31. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs GAN Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET and GAN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBET vs CNTY Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while CNTY trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNTY's ROE of -6.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs CDROW Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while CDROW trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CDROW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs LTRY Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs LTRYW Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while LTRYW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs SLNA Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs SLNAW Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs GMBL Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 349.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while GMBL trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET and GMBL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBET vs GMBLP Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 48.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while GMBLP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET and GMBLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EBET vs GMBLW Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs GMBLZ Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.
EBET vs GNOG Comparison
EBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EBET stands at 1.5K. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EBET is priced at $0.00, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EBET currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, EBET's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EBET is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBET.