Citizens Financial Services, Inc.
Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (CZFS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CZFS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZFS | $63.16 | -2.76% | 305M | 7.74 | $8.20 | +3.13% |
| USB-PA | $785.91 | +0.47% | 1.3T | 222.01 | $3.51 | +3.62% |
| HDB | $25.41 | +0.59% | 130.3B | 17.76 | $1.43 | +4.42% |
| MFG | $8.60 | +2.20% | 106.3B | 16.24 | $0.53 | +2.28% |
| ITUB | $8.70 | +1.99% | 96B | 10.89 | $0.80 | +7.16% |
| IBN | $26.59 | +0.11% | 95.2B | 16.72 | $1.59 | +0.94% |
| PNC | $223.00 | +1.96% | 90B | 12.95 | $17.22 | +3.04% |
| USB | $56.66 | +0.87% | 88.1B | 11.88 | $4.77 | +3.62% |
| LYG | $5.44 | +3.62% | 80.2B | 13.30 | $0.41 | +3.63% |
| USB-PP | $22.10 | +0.32% | 69.6B | 4.78 | $4.64 | +3.62% |
Stock Comparison
CZFS vs USB-PA Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while USB-PA trades at $785.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 222.01. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check USB-PA's competition here
CZFS vs HDB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 130.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while HDB trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check HDB's competition here
CZFS vs MFG Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 106.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while MFG trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check MFG's competition here
CZFS vs ITUB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 96B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while ITUB trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check ITUB's competition here
CZFS vs IBN Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 95.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while IBN trades at $26.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check IBN's competition here
CZFS vs PNC Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 90B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while PNC trades at $223.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check PNC's competition here
CZFS vs USB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while USB trades at $56.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check USB's competition here
CZFS vs LYG Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 80.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while LYG trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check LYG's competition here
CZFS vs USB-PP Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while USB-PP trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check USB-PP's competition here
CZFS vs USB-PS Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while USB-PS trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check USB-PS's competition here
CZFS vs USB-PH Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while USB-PH trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check USB-PH's competition here
CZFS vs TFC Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while TFC trades at $51.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check TFC's competition here
CZFS vs DB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while DB trades at $31.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check DB's competition here
CZFS vs BSBR Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while BSBR trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check BSBR's competition here
CZFS vs HBANZ Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while HBANZ trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check HBANZ's competition here
CZFS vs BBD Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while BBD trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check BBD's competition here
CZFS vs HBANL Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while HBANL trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check HBANL's competition here
CZFS vs KB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while KB trades at $111.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check KB's competition here
CZFS vs BBDO Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while BBDO trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check BBDO's competition here
CZFS vs FITB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while FITB trades at $50.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check FITB's competition here
CZFS vs HBANM Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while HBANM trades at $22.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check HBANM's competition here
CZFS vs SHG Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while SHG trades at $68.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check SHG's competition here
CZFS vs MTB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while MTB trades at $218.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check MTB's competition here
CZFS vs CFG Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while CFG trades at $65.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check CFG's competition here
CZFS vs KEY-PL Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while KEY-PL trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check KEY-PL's competition here
CZFS vs TFC-PO Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while TFC-PO trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check TFC-PO's competition here
CZFS vs HBANP Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while HBANP trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check HBANP's competition here
CZFS vs HBAN Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while HBAN trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check HBAN's competition here
CZFS vs BAP Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while BAP trades at $324.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check BAP's competition here
CZFS vs USB-PR Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while USB-PR trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check USB-PR's competition here
CZFS vs TFC-PI Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while TFC-PI trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check TFC-PI's competition here
CZFS vs RF Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while RF trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check RF's competition here
CZFS vs KEY Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while KEY trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check KEY's competition here
CZFS vs TFC-PR Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while TFC-PR trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check TFC-PR's competition here
CZFS vs FITBM Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while FITBM trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check FITBM's competition here
CZFS vs USB-PQ Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while USB-PQ trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check USB-PQ's competition here
CZFS vs FCNCA Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while FCNCA trades at $1,983.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check FCNCA's competition here
CZFS vs FCNCN Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while FCNCN trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check FCNCN's competition here
CZFS vs RF-PF Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while RF-PF trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check RF-PF's competition here
CZFS vs KEY-PJ Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
CZFS vs RF-PC Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while RF-PC trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check RF-PC's competition here
CZFS vs KEY-PI Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while KEY-PI trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check KEY-PI's competition here
CZFS vs BCH Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while BCH trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check BCH's competition here
CZFS vs WF Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while WF trades at $70.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check WF's competition here
CZFS vs KEY-PK Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while KEY-PK trades at $21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check KEY-PK's competition here
CZFS vs FITBP Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while FITBP trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check FITBP's competition here
CZFS vs FITBI Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while FITBI trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check FITBI's competition here
CZFS vs CIB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while CIB trades at $68.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check CIB's competition here
CZFS vs BSAC Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while BSAC trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check BSAC's competition here
CZFS vs CFG-PD Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check CFG-PD's competition here
CZFS vs RF-PE Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while RF-PE trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check RF-PE's competition here
CZFS vs VLYPN Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while VLYPN trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check VLYPN's competition here
CZFS vs FITBO Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while FITBO trades at $19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check FITBO's competition here
CZFS vs FHN-PB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check FHN-PB's competition here
CZFS vs FHN-PE Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while FHN-PE trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check FHN-PE's competition here
CZFS vs CFG-PH Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while CFG-PH trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check CFG-PH's competition here
CZFS vs FHN-PC Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while FHN-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check FHN-PC's competition here
CZFS vs FHN Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while FHN trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check FHN's competition here
CZFS vs WBS Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while WBS trades at $72.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check WBS's competition here
CZFS vs CMA Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while CMA trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check CMA's competition here
CZFS vs WTFC Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while WTFC trades at $150.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check WTFC's competition here
CZFS vs BPOP Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while BPOP trades at $150.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check BPOP's competition here
CZFS vs UMBF Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while UMBF trades at $126.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check UMBF's competition here
CZFS vs SSB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while SSB trades at $97.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check SSB's competition here
CZFS vs ONBPP Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while ONBPP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check ONBPP's competition here
CZFS vs ONBPO Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while ONBPO trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check ONBPO's competition here
CZFS vs ZION Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while ZION trades at $63.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check ZION's competition here
CZFS vs ONB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while ONB trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check ONB's competition here
CZFS vs CFR Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while CFR trades at $144.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check CFR's competition here
CZFS vs WAL Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while WAL trades at $81.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check WAL's competition here
CZFS vs FHN-PD Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check FHN-PD's competition here
CZFS vs FHN-PF Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while FHN-PF trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check FHN-PF's competition here
CZFS vs CHYM Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while CHYM trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check CHYM's competition here
CZFS vs CFG-PE Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while CFG-PE trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check CFG-PE's competition here
CZFS vs BOKF Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while BOKF trades at $133.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check BOKF's competition here
CZFS vs CADE Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while CADE trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check CADE's competition here
CZFS vs CBSH Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while CBSH trades at $52.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check CBSH's competition here
CZFS vs PNFP Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while PNFP trades at $98.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check PNFP's competition here
CZFS vs VLY Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while VLY trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check VLY's competition here
CZFS vs BSMX Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check BSMX's competition here
CZFS vs PB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while PB trades at $69.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check PB's competition here
CZFS vs COLB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while COLB trades at $29.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check COLB's competition here
CZFS vs SNV Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while SNV trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check SNV's competition here
CZFS vs SNV-PD Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check SNV-PD's competition here
CZFS vs GGAL Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while GGAL trades at $41.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 43.52. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check GGAL's competition here
CZFS vs CUBI-PE Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
CZFS vs CBC Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while CBC trades at $27.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 900.83. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check CBC's competition here
CZFS vs GBCI Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while GBCI trades at $49.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check GBCI's competition here
CZFS vs FNB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while FNB trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check FNB's competition here
CZFS vs UBSI Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while UBSI trades at $43.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check UBSI's competition here
CZFS vs ABCB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while ABCB trades at $85.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check ABCB's competition here
CZFS vs FLG Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while FLG trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -27.94. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check FLG's competition here
CZFS vs HWC Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while HWC trades at $67.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check HWC's competition here
CZFS vs AX Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while AX trades at $96.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check AX's competition here
CZFS vs VLYPP Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while VLYPP trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check VLYPP's competition here
CZFS vs VLYPO Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while VLYPO trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check VLYPO's competition here
CZFS vs HOMB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while HOMB trades at $26.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check HOMB's competition here
CZFS vs AUB Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while AUB trades at $37.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check AUB's competition here
CZFS vs AVAL Comparison May 2026
CZFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZFS stands at 305M. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CZFS is priced at $63.16, while AVAL trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZFS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, CZFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZFS is more volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZFS.Check AVAL's competition here