Cintas Corporation
Cintas Corporation (CTAS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CTAS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTAS | $197.97 | +0.00% | 80.4B | 43.29 | $4.62 | +0.87% |
| TRI | $85.16 | +0.00% | 37B | 25.29 | $3.29 | +2.92% |
| CPRT | $37.65 | +0.00% | 35.3B | 22.38 | $1.63 | N/A |
| GPN | $80.25 | +0.00% | 19.5B | 12.52 | $6.59 | +1.22% |
| RBA | $103.69 | +0.00% | 19.2B | 51.20 | $2.02 | +1.18% |
| RTO | $31.33 | +0.00% | 16.2B | 50.81 | $0.63 | +1.74% |
| ULS | $82.64 | +0.00% | 16.1B | 47.98 | $1.67 | +0.65% |
| BIPI | $17.13 | +0.00% | 13.6B | N/A | N/A | +7.47% |
| ARMK | $40.53 | +0.00% | 10.8B | 34.38 | $1.19 | +1.10% |
| IAA | $39.89 | -0.10% | 5.3B | 18.55 | $2.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CTAS vs TRI Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while TRI trades at $85.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check TRI's competition here
CTAS vs CPRT Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while CPRT trades at $37.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check CPRT's competition here
CTAS vs GPN Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while GPN trades at $80.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check GPN's competition here
CTAS vs RBA Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while RBA trades at $103.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 51.20. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check RBA's competition here
CTAS vs RTO Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while RTO trades at $31.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 50.81. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check RTO's competition here
CTAS vs ULS Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while ULS trades at $82.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 47.98. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ULS's competition here
CTAS vs BIPI Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while BIPI trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check BIPI's competition here
CTAS vs ARMK Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while ARMK trades at $40.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ARMK's competition here
CTAS vs IAA Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check IAA's competition here
CTAS vs UNF Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while UNF trades at $235.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 31.47. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check UNF's competition here
CTAS vs MMS Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while MMS trades at $74.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check MMS's competition here
CTAS vs ABM Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while ABM trades at $45.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ABM's competition here
CTAS vs TIC Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while TIC trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -8.09. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to TIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check TIC's competition here
CTAS vs FA Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while FA trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check FA's competition here
CTAS vs RHLD Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while RHLD trades at $188.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RHLD's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check RHLD's competition here
CTAS vs CBZ Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while CBZ trades at $29.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check CBZ's competition here
CTAS vs BV Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while BV trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 197.43. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check BV's competition here
CTAS vs VVI Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check VVI's competition here
CTAS vs LZ Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while LZ trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 54.67. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check LZ's competition here
CTAS vs SP Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check SP's competition here
CTAS vs PRSU Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while PRSU trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is -44.24. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check PRSU's competition here
CTAS vs TDCX Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check TDCX's competition here
CTAS vs TH Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 661.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while TH trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -66.30. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check TH's competition here
CTAS vs KODK Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 633.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while KODK trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -23.87. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to KODK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check KODK's competition here
CTAS vs CASS Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 585M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while CASS trades at $44.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check CASS's competition here
CTAS vs ACTG Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 402.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while ACTG trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is 69.50. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ACTG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ACTG's competition here
CTAS vs CVEO Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 358.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while CVEO trades at $28.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -13.66. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check CVEO's competition here
CTAS vs QUAD Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 356.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while QUAD trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check QUAD's competition here
CTAS vs PPHC Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 350.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while PPHC trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check PPHC's competition here
CTAS vs SPIR Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 305.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while SPIR trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SPIR's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check SPIR's competition here
CTAS vs PFMT Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PFMT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check PFMT's competition here
CTAS vs RHLDV Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check RHLDV's competition here
CTAS vs BUUU Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 187.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while BUUU trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is 229.57. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check BUUU's competition here
CTAS vs PFSW Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check PFSW's competition here
CTAS vs ARC Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ARC's competition here
CTAS vs ANPA Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 116.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while ANPA trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 932.00. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ANPA's competition here
CTAS vs SMX Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while SMX trades at $41.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SMX's ROE of -3.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check SMX's competition here
CTAS vs DLHC Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while DLHC trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -72.62. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check DLHC's competition here
CTAS vs TISI Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while TISI trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TISI's ROE of +13.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check TISI's competition here
CTAS vs OMEX Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while OMEX trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check OMEX's competition here
CTAS vs SST Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while SST trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SST's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check SST's competition here
CTAS vs NTIP Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while NTIP trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check NTIP's competition here
CTAS vs THH Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while THH trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check THH's competition here
CTAS vs PMEC Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while PMEC trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -13.79. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check PMEC's competition here
CTAS vs YSXT Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while YSXT trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check YSXT's competition here
CTAS vs ZGM Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while ZGM trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ZGM's competition here
CTAS vs SGRP Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while SGRP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check SGRP's competition here
CTAS vs WHLM Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while WHLM trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 34.95. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check WHLM's competition here
CTAS vs SFHG Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while SFHG trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check SFHG's competition here
CTAS vs MSGY Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while MSGY trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check MSGY's competition here
CTAS vs ATTO Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ATTO's competition here
CTAS vs CRE Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while CRE trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CRE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to CRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check CRE's competition here
CTAS vs PMAX Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while PMAX trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check PMAX's competition here
CTAS vs LICN Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while LICN trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check LICN's competition here
CTAS vs THWWW Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check THWWW's competition here
CTAS vs BLMZ Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check BLMZ's competition here
CTAS vs GPAK Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 12.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check GPAK's competition here
CTAS vs PAE Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check PAE's competition here
CTAS vs PAEWW Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check PAEWW's competition here
CTAS vs RRD Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check RRD's competition here
CTAS vs ALJJ Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ALJJ's competition here
CTAS vs CRN Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to CRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check CRN's competition here
CTAS vs INTX Comparison February 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 80.4B. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $197.97, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.29, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to INTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check INTX's competition here