Ceragon Networks Ltd.
Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRNT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRNT | $1.97 | +0.00% | 170.6M | 12.80 | $0.15 | N/A |
| CSCO | $69.30 | +0.00% | 262.2B | 25.36 | $2.61 | +2.45% |
| MSI | $461.61 | +0.00% | 76.7B | 37.12 | $12.41 | +0.92% |
| HPE | $21.32 | +0.00% | 27.8B | 20.35 | $1.04 | +2.46% |
| ERIC | $7.61 | +0.00% | 25.6B | 14.28 | $0.54 | +3.54% |
| UI | $417.19 | +0.00% | 24.4B | 44.33 | $9.09 | +0.60% |
| NOK | $4.13 | +0.00% | 22.6B | 22.13 | $0.19 | +3.68% |
| CRDO | $117.33 | +0.00% | 20B | 402.55 | $0.29 | N/A |
| ZBRA | $327.71 | +0.00% | 16.2B | 30.02 | $10.59 | N/A |
| ASTS | $48.50 | +0.00% | 14.4B | -25.85 | -$1.86 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRNT vs CSCO Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 262.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while CSCO trades at $69.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check CSCO's competition here
CRNT vs MSI Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while MSI trades at $461.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSI's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check MSI's competition here
CRNT vs HPE Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while HPE trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check HPE's competition here
CRNT vs ERIC Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while ERIC trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ERIC's competition here
CRNT vs UI Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while UI trades at $417.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 44.33. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UI's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check UI's competition here
CRNT vs NOK Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while NOK trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check NOK's competition here
CRNT vs CRDO Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while CRDO trades at $117.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 402.55. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check CRDO's competition here
CRNT vs ZBRA Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while ZBRA trades at $327.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 30.02. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ZBRA's competition here
CRNT vs ASTS Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while ASTS trades at $48.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -25.85. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ASTS's competition here
CRNT vs JNPR Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while JNPR trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check JNPR's competition here
CRNT vs CIEN Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while CIEN trades at $91.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 124.49. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check CIEN's competition here
CRNT vs LITE Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while LITE trades at $114.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is 313.14. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LITE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check LITE's competition here
CRNT vs SATS Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while SATS trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -26.28. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SATS's competition here
CRNT vs BDC Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while BDC trades at $125.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check BDC's competition here
CRNT vs PI Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while PI trades at $167.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -2696.17. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check PI's competition here
CRNT vs MAXR Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check MAXR's competition here
CRNT vs VSAT Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while VSAT trades at $27.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check VSAT's competition here
CRNT vs COMM Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while COMM trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is 57.41. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COMM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check COMM's competition here
CRNT vs EXTR Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while EXTR trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is -328.67. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXTR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check EXTR's competition here
CRNT vs VIAV Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while VIAV trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 71.87. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIAV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check VIAV's competition here
CRNT vs KN Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while KN trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 67.67. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check KN's competition here
CRNT vs INFN Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INFN's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check INFN's competition here
CRNT vs SWIR Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SWIR's competition here
CRNT vs DGII Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while DGII trades at $32.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check DGII's competition here
CRNT vs HLIT Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while HLIT trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check HLIT's competition here
CRNT vs ITRN Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 810.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while ITRN trades at $41.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ITRN's competition here
CRNT vs POLY Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check POLY's competition here
CRNT vs ADTN Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 707.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while ADTN trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ADTN's competition here
CRNT vs NTGR Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 706.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while NTGR trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTGR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check NTGR's competition here
CRNT vs ONDS Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 672.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while ONDS trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -7.55. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONDS's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ONDS's competition here
CRNT vs AIOT Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 609.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while AIOT trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -15.23. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check AIOT's competition here
CRNT vs GILT Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 502.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while GILT trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check GILT's competition here
CRNT vs PWFL Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check PWFL's competition here
CRNT vs CLFD Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 433.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while CLFD trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is 3138.00. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check CLFD's competition here
CRNT vs TSAT Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 324M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while TSAT trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check TSAT's competition here
CRNT vs ITI Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ITI's competition here
CRNT vs FEIM Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 299.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while FEIM trades at $30.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check FEIM's competition here
CRNT vs AUDC Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 293M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while AUDC trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check AUDC's competition here
CRNT vs AVNW Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 274.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while AVNW trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is -113.42. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVNW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check AVNW's competition here
CRNT vs SATX Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while SATX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SATX's competition here
CRNT vs BKTI Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 239.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while BKTI trades at $61.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check BKTI's competition here
CRNT vs PCTI Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check PCTI's competition here
CRNT vs INSG Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 129.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while INSG trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is -8.79. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INSG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check INSG's competition here
CRNT vs LTRX Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 112.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while LTRX trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -13.14. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check LTRX's competition here
CRNT vs KVHI Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 104.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while KVHI trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check KVHI's competition here
CRNT vs SILC Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 90.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while SILC trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SILC's competition here
CRNT vs TESS Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check TESS's competition here
CRNT vs JCS Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check JCS's competition here
CRNT vs AMPGW Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while AMPGW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check AMPGW's competition here
CRNT vs AMPG Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while AMPG trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check AMPG's competition here
CRNT vs CMTL Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while CMTL trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check CMTL's competition here
CRNT vs AIRG Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while AIRG trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check AIRG's competition here
CRNT vs FKWL Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while FKWL trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -28.71. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check FKWL's competition here
CRNT vs WTT Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check WTT's competition here
CRNT vs OCC Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while OCC trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -14.24. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check OCC's competition here
CRNT vs MOB Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while MOB trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOB's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check MOB's competition here
CRNT vs BOSC Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while BOSC trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check BOSC's competition here
CRNT vs SYTAW Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while SYTAW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SYTAW's competition here
CRNT vs SYTA Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while SYTA trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SYTA's competition here
CRNT vs UTSI Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while UTSI trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check UTSI's competition here
CRNT vs CMBM Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while CMBM trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMBM's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check CMBM's competition here
CRNT vs MINM Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while MINM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check MINM's competition here
CRNT vs SYNX Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while SYNX trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SYNX's competition here
CRNT vs IOTR Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while IOTR trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -39.56. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check IOTR's competition here
CRNT vs SONM Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while SONM trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SONM's ROE of -17.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SONM's competition here
CRNT vs CLRO Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while CLRO trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check CLRO's competition here
CRNT vs MITQ Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while MITQ trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check MITQ's competition here
CRNT vs AKTS Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, AKTS has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while AKTS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas AKTS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKTS's ROE of +5.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to AKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check AKTS's competition here
CRNT vs VISL Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while VISL trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VISL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check VISL's competition here
CRNT vs BOXL Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while BOXL trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check BOXL's competition here
CRNT vs ASNS Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while ASNS trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ASNS's competition here
CRNT vs MOBBW Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while MOBBW trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check MOBBW's competition here
CRNT vs CASA Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check CASA's competition here
CRNT vs MYNA Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check MYNA's competition here
CRNT vs DZSI Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while DZSI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check DZSI's competition here
CRNT vs EXFO Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check EXFO's competition here
CRNT vs SATX-WTA Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SATX-WTA's competition here
CRNT vs ORBC Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ORBC's competition here
CRNT vs ZXZZT Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while ZXZZT trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ZXZZT's competition here
CRNT vs VCRA Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check VCRA's competition here
CRNT vs BDR Comparison August 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 170.6M. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $1.97, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.80, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check BDR's competition here