Ceragon Networks Ltd.
Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRNT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRNT | $2.36 | +1.55% | 203M | 8.79 | $0.26 | N/A |
| CSCO | $67.57 | -1.05% | 272.1B | 28.04 | $2.45 | +2.36% |
| MSI | $428.99 | +0.98% | 71.5B | 35.75 | $11.98 | +0.99% |
| HPE | $20.88 | +1.78% | 27.2B | 19.92 | $1.04 | +2.52% |
| UI | $454.35 | +1.56% | 27B | 49.15 | $9.08 | +0.54% |
| ERIC | $7.43 | -0.60% | 25.3B | 13.62 | $0.55 | +0.35% |
| NOK | $4.30 | -1.04% | 23.4B | 22.87 | $0.19 | +3.26% |
| ASTS | $54.30 | -9.59% | 19B | -27.44 | -$1.98 | N/A |
| CRDO | $105.01 | +3.80% | 17.4B | 349.03 | $0.29 | N/A |
| ZBRA | $336.14 | +0.82% | 17.1B | 31.76 | $10.57 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRNT vs CSCO Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 272.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while CSCO trades at $67.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check CSCO's competition here
CRNT vs MSI Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while MSI trades at $428.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MSI's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check MSI's competition here
CRNT vs HPE Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while HPE trades at $20.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check HPE's competition here
CRNT vs UI Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while UI trades at $454.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 49.15. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UI's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check UI's competition here
CRNT vs ERIC Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while ERIC trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ERIC's competition here
CRNT vs NOK Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while NOK trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check NOK's competition here
CRNT vs ASTS Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while ASTS trades at $54.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -27.44. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ASTS's competition here
CRNT vs CRDO Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while CRDO trades at $105.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 349.03. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check CRDO's competition here
CRNT vs ZBRA Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while ZBRA trades at $336.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ZBRA's competition here
CRNT vs JNPR Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while JNPR trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check JNPR's competition here
CRNT vs CIEN Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while CIEN trades at $89.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 121.34. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check CIEN's competition here
CRNT vs SATS Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while SATS trades at $29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -39.56. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SATS's competition here
CRNT vs LITE Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while LITE trades at $106.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is -16.18. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LITE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check LITE's competition here
CRNT vs BDC Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while BDC trades at $129.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check BDC's competition here
CRNT vs MAXR Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check MAXR's competition here
CRNT vs PI Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while PI trades at $125.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -2072.33. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check PI's competition here
CRNT vs EXTR Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while EXTR trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is -43.54. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXTR's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check EXTR's competition here
CRNT vs VIAV Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while VIAV trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 508.75. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIAV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check VIAV's competition here
CRNT vs VSAT Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while VSAT trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check VSAT's competition here
CRNT vs KN Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while KN trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 75.56. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check KN's competition here
CRNT vs COMM Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while COMM trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is -44.33. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COMM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check COMM's competition here
CRNT vs INFN Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INFN's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check INFN's competition here
CRNT vs DGII Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while DGII trades at $34.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check DGII's competition here
CRNT vs SWIR Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SWIR's competition here
CRNT vs HLIT Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while HLIT trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLIT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check HLIT's competition here
CRNT vs ITRN Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 808.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while ITRN trades at $40.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ITRN's competition here
CRNT vs POLY Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check POLY's competition here
CRNT vs NTGR Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 742M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while NTGR trades at $25.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NTGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check NTGR's competition here
CRNT vs ADTN Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 738.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while ADTN trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ADTN's competition here
CRNT vs CLFD Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 612.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while CLFD trades at $45.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is -316.50. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check CLFD's competition here
CRNT vs AIOT Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 609.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while AIOT trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check AIOT's competition here
CRNT vs PWFL Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check PWFL's competition here
CRNT vs GILT Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 441.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while GILT trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 32.25. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check GILT's competition here
CRNT vs TSAT Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 383.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while TSAT trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check TSAT's competition here
CRNT vs ONDS Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 371.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while ONDS trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ONDS's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ONDS's competition here
CRNT vs AUDC Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 310.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while AUDC trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check AUDC's competition here
CRNT vs ITI Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ITI's competition here
CRNT vs AVNW Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 295.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while AVNW trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is -122.05. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AVNW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check AVNW's competition here
CRNT vs FEIM Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 272.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while FEIM trades at $28.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check FEIM's competition here
CRNT vs SATX Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while SATX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SATX's competition here
CRNT vs BKTI Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 139.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while BKTI trades at $40.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check BKTI's competition here
CRNT vs PCTI Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check PCTI's competition here
CRNT vs LTRX Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 124.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while LTRX trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -14.55. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT and LTRX have similar daily volatility (3.67).Check LTRX's competition here
CRNT vs INSG Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 110.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while INSG trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INSG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check INSG's competition here
CRNT vs KVHI Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 103.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while KVHI trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check KVHI's competition here
CRNT vs SILC Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 90.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while SILC trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -7.16. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SILC's competition here
CRNT vs TESS Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check TESS's competition here
CRNT vs JCS Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check JCS's competition here
CRNT vs CMTL Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while CMTL trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check CMTL's competition here
CRNT vs AMPG Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while AMPG trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check AMPG's competition here
CRNT vs AIRG Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while AIRG trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check AIRG's competition here
CRNT vs AMPGW Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while AMPGW trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check AMPGW's competition here
CRNT vs FKWL Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while FKWL trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -28.43. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check FKWL's competition here
CRNT vs WTT Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check WTT's competition here
CRNT vs OCC Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while OCC trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check OCC's competition here
CRNT vs SYTAW Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while SYTAW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SYTAW's competition here
CRNT vs SYTA Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while SYTA trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SYTA's competition here
CRNT vs BOSC Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while BOSC trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check BOSC's competition here
CRNT vs CMBM Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while CMBM trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMBM's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check CMBM's competition here
CRNT vs MOB Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while MOB trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOB's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check MOB's competition here
CRNT vs UTSI Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while UTSI trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check UTSI's competition here
CRNT vs MINM Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while MINM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check MINM's competition here
CRNT vs IOTR Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while IOTR trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -51.49. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check IOTR's competition here
CRNT vs SONM Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while SONM trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SONM's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SONM's competition here
CRNT vs SYNX Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while SYNX trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SYNX's competition here
CRNT vs CLRO Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while CLRO trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check CLRO's competition here
CRNT vs MITQ Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while MITQ trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check MITQ's competition here
CRNT vs BOXL Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while BOXL trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check BOXL's competition here
CRNT vs AKTS Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, AKTS has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while AKTS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas AKTS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AKTS's ROE of +23.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to AKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check AKTS's competition here
CRNT vs VISL Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while VISL trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VISL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check VISL's competition here
CRNT vs ASNS Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while ASNS trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ASNS's competition here
CRNT vs CASA Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check CASA's competition here
CRNT vs MOBBW Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while MOBBW trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check MOBBW's competition here
CRNT vs MYNA Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check MYNA's competition here
CRNT vs DZSI Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while DZSI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check DZSI's competition here
CRNT vs VCRA Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check VCRA's competition here
CRNT vs EXFO Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check EXFO's competition here
CRNT vs BDR Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check BDR's competition here
CRNT vs SATX-WTA Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check SATX-WTA's competition here
CRNT vs ORBC Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ORBC's competition here
CRNT vs ZXZZT Comparison July 2025
CRNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRNT stands at 203M. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRNT is priced at $2.36, while ZXZZT trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRNT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.79, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRNT is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNT.Check ZXZZT's competition here