Clearfield, Inc.
Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLFD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLFD | $29.05 | +1.25% | 393.9M | 63.22 | $0.45 | N/A |
| CSCO | $79.01 | +1.64% | 309.5B | 28.18 | $2.78 | +2.10% |
| MSI | $473.94 | +2.44% | 78.8B | 37.07 | $12.77 | +0.95% |
| CIEN | $361.14 | +7.22% | 47.7B | 210.86 | $1.60 | N/A |
| UI | $777.00 | +3.62% | 46B | 51.95 | $14.63 | +0.40% |
| NOK | $8.67 | +6.52% | 44.4B | 63.31 | $0.13 | +1.73% |
| LITE | $651.87 | +5.81% | 44.4B | 181.49 | $3.43 | N/A |
| ERIC | $11.92 | +4.35% | 38.5B | 12.43 | $0.92 | +2.13% |
| SATS | $113.47 | +5.35% | 31.2B | -2.15 | -$50.41 | N/A |
| HPE | $21.77 | +0.86% | 28.8B | -539.50 | -$0.04 | +2.47% |
Stock Comparison
CLFD vs CSCO Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 309.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while CSCO trades at $79.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CSCO's competition here
CLFD vs MSI Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while MSI trades at $473.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 37.07. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MSI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check MSI's competition here
CLFD vs CIEN Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while CIEN trades at $361.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 210.86. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CIEN's competition here
CLFD vs UI Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while UI trades at $777.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 51.95. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UI's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check UI's competition here
CLFD vs NOK Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while NOK trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 63.31. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check NOK's competition here
CLFD vs LITE Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while LITE trades at $651.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is 181.49. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LITE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check LITE's competition here
CLFD vs ERIC Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while ERIC trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ERIC's competition here
CLFD vs SATS Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while SATS trades at $113.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SATS's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SATS's competition here
CLFD vs HPE Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while HPE trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is -539.50. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HPE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check HPE's competition here
CLFD vs ASTS Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while ASTS trades at $87.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -64.43. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ASTS's competition here
CLFD vs CRDO Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while CRDO trades at $115.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 64.66. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CRDO's competition here
CLFD vs JNPR Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while JNPR trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check JNPR's competition here
CLFD vs ZBRA Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while ZBRA trades at $202.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ZBRA's competition here
CLFD vs VIAV Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while VIAV trades at $31.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is -157.74. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VIAV's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check VIAV's competition here
CLFD vs VSAT Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while VSAT trades at $47.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -17.75. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check VSAT's competition here
CLFD vs ONDS Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while ONDS trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -28.22. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ONDS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ONDS's competition here
CLFD vs BDC Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while BDC trades at $115.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check BDC's competition here
CLFD vs MAXR Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check MAXR's competition here
CLFD vs VISN Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, VISN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while VISN trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas VISN's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VISN's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to VISN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check VISN's competition here
CLFD vs COMM Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while COMM trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COMM's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check COMM's competition here
CLFD vs PI Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while PI trades at $96.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -247.93. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check PI's competition here
CLFD vs KN Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while KN trades at $24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 42.67. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check KN's competition here
CLFD vs EXTR Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while EXTR trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is 241.50. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EXTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check EXTR's competition here
CLFD vs DGII Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while DGII trades at $50.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 43.86. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check DGII's competition here
CLFD vs INFN Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INFN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check INFN's competition here
CLFD vs SWIR Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SWIR's competition here
CLFD vs HLIT Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while HLIT trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 931.00. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HLIT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check HLIT's competition here
CLFD vs ITRN Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 988.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while ITRN trades at $50.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ITRN's competition here
CLFD vs GILT Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 977.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while GILT trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 48.38. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check GILT's competition here
CLFD vs ADTN Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 801.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while ADTN trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -19.12. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ADTN's competition here
CLFD vs POLY Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check POLY's competition here
CLFD vs NTGR Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 612.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while NTGR trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is -34.24. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NTGR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check NTGR's competition here
CLFD vs TSAT Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 505.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while TSAT trades at $35.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check TSAT's competition here
CLFD vs PWFL Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check PWFL's competition here
CLFD vs FEIM Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 470.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while FEIM trades at $48.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check FEIM's competition here
CLFD vs AIOT Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 419.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while AIOT trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check AIOT's competition here
CLFD vs AVNW Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 317.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while AVNW trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AVNW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check AVNW's competition here
CLFD vs ITI Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ITI's competition here
CLFD vs BKTI Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 289.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while BKTI trades at $74.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check BKTI's competition here
CLFD vs SATX Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while SATX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SATX's competition here
CLFD vs LTRX Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while LTRX trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -27.48. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check LTRX's competition here
CLFD vs AUDC Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 235.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while AUDC trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check AUDC's competition here
CLFD vs CRNT Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 197.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while CRNT trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is -110.00. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CRNT's competition here
CLFD vs INSG Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while INSG trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is -79.57. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INSG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check INSG's competition here
CLFD vs KVHI Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 138.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while KVHI trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check KVHI's competition here
CLFD vs CMTL Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 138.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while CMTL trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CMTL's competition here
CLFD vs PCTI Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check PCTI's competition here
CLFD vs SILC Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while SILC trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SILC's competition here
CLFD vs TESS Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check TESS's competition here
CLFD vs JCS Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JCS's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check JCS's competition here
CLFD vs MOB Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while MOB trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MOB's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check MOB's competition here
CLFD vs OCC Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 65.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while OCC trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -41.11. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check OCC's competition here
CLFD vs AMPG Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while AMPG trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check AMPG's competition here
CLFD vs AIRG Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while AIRG trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check AIRG's competition here
CLFD vs WTT Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check WTT's competition here
CLFD vs FKWL Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while FKWL trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is 183.50. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FKWL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check FKWL's competition here
CLFD vs SYTA Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while SYTA trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SYTA's competition here
CLFD vs CMBM Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while CMBM trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMBM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CMBM's competition here
CLFD vs BOSC Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while BOSC trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check BOSC's competition here
CLFD vs MOBBW Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while MOBBW trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check MOBBW's competition here
CLFD vs FIEE Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, FIEE has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while FIEE trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas FIEE's P/E ratio is -57.33. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FIEE's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to FIEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check FIEE's competition here
CLFD vs UTSI Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while UTSI trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check UTSI's competition here
CLFD vs MINM Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while MINM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MINM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check MINM's competition here
CLFD vs CLRO Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while CLRO trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CLRO's competition here
CLFD vs SYNX Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while SYNX trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SYNX's competition here
CLFD vs MITQ Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while MITQ trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -18.38. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check MITQ's competition here
CLFD vs IOTR Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while IOTR trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -9.85. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check IOTR's competition here
CLFD vs SONM Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while SONM trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SONM's ROE of +15.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SONM's competition here
CLFD vs VISL Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while VISL trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VISL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check VISL's competition here
CLFD vs CASA Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check CASA's competition here
CLFD vs MYNA Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check MYNA's competition here
CLFD vs AMPGW Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while AMPGW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check AMPGW's competition here
CLFD vs DZSI Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while DZSI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check DZSI's competition here
CLFD vs ASNS Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 371K. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while ASNS trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ASNS's competition here
CLFD vs SYTAW Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 55.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while SYTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SYTAW's competition here
CLFD vs ZXZZT Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while ZXZZT trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ZXZZT's competition here
CLFD vs GIMO Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, GIMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while GIMO trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas GIMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GIMO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to GIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check GIMO's competition here
CLFD vs VCRA Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check VCRA's competition here
CLFD vs BDR Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check BDR's competition here
CLFD vs EXFO Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check EXFO's competition here
CLFD vs RKUS Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, RKUS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while RKUS trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas RKUS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RKUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to RKUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check RKUS's competition here
CLFD vs SATX-WTA Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check SATX-WTA's competition here
CLFD vs ORBC Comparison March 2026
CLFD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLFD stands at 393.9M. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLFD is priced at $29.05, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLFD currently has a P/E ratio of 63.22, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLFD's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLFD is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLFD.Check ORBC's competition here