Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares
Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares CIGL Peers
See (CIGL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIGL | $14.71 | +51.65% | 21.1M | -3.89 | -$3.78 | N/A |
| ALLE | $144.12 | +0.16% | 12.4B | 20.21 | $7.13 | +1.38% |
| ADT | $8.47 | +0.47% | 6.6B | 13.01 | $0.65 | +2.62% |
| MSA | $167.53 | +0.12% | 6.6B | 23.11 | $7.25 | +1.24% |
| BCO | $89.29 | +0.21% | 3.8B | 24.08 | $3.71 | +1.10% |
| GEO | $23.95 | +0.71% | 3.4B | 108.80 | $0.22 | N/A |
| REZI | $22.06 | -1.78% | 3.3B | 73.50 | $0.30 | N/A |
| BRC | $67.97 | -1.36% | 3.2B | 16.77 | $4.05 | +1.40% |
| VVNT | $12.00 | +0.00% | 2.6B | -50.00 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| ARLO | $16.96 | -1.22% | 1.8B | -77.07 | -$0.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CIGL vs ALLE Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, ALLE has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while ALLE trades at $144.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas ALLE's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ALLE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to ALLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs ADT Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, ADT has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while ADT trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas ADT's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ADT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to ADT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs MSA Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, MSA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while MSA trades at $167.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas MSA's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MSA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to MSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs BCO Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, BCO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while BCO trades at $89.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas BCO's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BCO's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to BCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs GEO Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, GEO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while GEO trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas GEO's P/E ratio is 108.80. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GEO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to GEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs REZI Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while REZI trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is 73.50. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to REZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to REZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs BRC Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, BRC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while BRC trades at $67.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas BRC's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BRC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to BRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs VVNT Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, VVNT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while VVNT trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas VVNT's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to VVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to VVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs ARLO Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while ARLO trades at $16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is -77.07. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ARLO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs NSSC Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, NSSC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while NSSC trades at $29.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas NSSC's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NSSC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to NSSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs EVLV Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, EVLV has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while EVLV trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas EVLV's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to EVLV's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to EVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs CIX Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, CIX has a market cap of 336.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while CIX trades at $26.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas CIX's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CIX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to CIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs NL Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, NL has a market cap of 313.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while NL trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas NL's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to NL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs MG Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, MG has a market cap of 251.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while MG trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas MG's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to MG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs SNT Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, SNT has a market cap of 109.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while SNT trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas SNT's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to SNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs BAER Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, BAER has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while BAER trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas BAER's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BAER's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to BAER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs EVLVW Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while EVLVW trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs NXTD Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, NXTD has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while NXTD trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas NXTD's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NXTD's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to NXTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs SPCB Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, SPCB has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while SPCB trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas SPCB's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SPCB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to SPCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs KSCP Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, KSCP has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while KSCP trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas KSCP's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to KSCP's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to KSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs GFAIW Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, GFAIW has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while GFAIW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas GFAIW's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GFAIW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to GFAIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs GFAI Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, GFAI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while GFAI trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas GFAI's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GFAI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to GFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs VRME Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, VRME has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while VRME trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas VRME's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to VRME's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to VRME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs UUU Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, UUU has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while UUU trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas UUU's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to UUU's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to UUU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs SUGP Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, SUGP has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while SUGP trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas SUGP's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SUGP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to SUGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs IVDAW Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, IVDAW has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while IVDAW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas IVDAW's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to IVDAW's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to IVDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs VRMEW Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, VRMEW has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while VRMEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas VRMEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to VRMEW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to VRMEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs IVDA Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, IVDA has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while IVDA trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas IVDA's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to IVDA's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to IVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs BKYI Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, BKYI has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while BKYI trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas BKYI's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BKYI's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to BKYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs BAERW Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, BAERW has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while BAERW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas BAERW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BAERW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to BAERW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs DGLY Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, DGLY has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while DGLY trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas DGLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DGLY's ROE of -9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to DGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.
CIGL vs LGMK Comparison
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 21.1M. In comparison, LGMK has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $14.71, while LGMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.89, whereas LGMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is +0.47%, compared to LGMK's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to LGMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.