Chesapeake Energy Corporation

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 120.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while COP trades at $96.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check COP's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while EOG trades at $121.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check EOG's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CNQ trades at $31.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CNQ's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while PXD trades at $269.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check PXD's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CEO trades at $121.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CEO's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while OXY-WT trades at $23.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check OXY-WT's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while HES trades at $148.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check HES's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while OXY trades at $45.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check OXY's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while FANG trades at $143.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check FANG's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while WDS trades at $17.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check WDS's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while EQT trades at $51.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check EQT's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while EXE trades at $94.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is -3155.33. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check EXE's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while DVN trades at $35.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check DVN's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while TPL trades at $911.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 45.41. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check TPL's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CTRA trades at $23.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CTRA's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while COG trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check COG's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while MRO trades at $28.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check MRO's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while OVV trades at $40.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check OVV's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while PR trades at $13.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check PR's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while AR trades at $30.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check AR's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CHKEW's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CHKEZ's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CHKEL's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while RRC trades at $33.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check RRC's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while SWN trades at $7.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SWN's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check SWN's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while APA trades at $21.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check APA's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CHRD trades at $105.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CHRD's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while MTDR trades at $48.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check MTDR's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CPG trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CPG's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while OAS trades at $109.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check OAS's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while DEN trades at $88.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check DEN's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CRK trades at $15.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is -61.42. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CRK's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while MGY trades at $24.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check MGY's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while BCEI trades at $54.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check BCEI's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CDEV trades at $7.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CDEV's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CRC trades at $49.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CRC's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while ERF trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check ERF's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CNX trades at $28.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CNX's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while VIST trades at $40.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check VIST's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while VRN trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check VRN's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while MUR trades at $24.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check MUR's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while SM trades at $27.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check SM's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CIVI trades at $33.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CIVI's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while ESTE trades at $21.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check ESTE's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while GPOR trades at $168.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is -24.87. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GPOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check GPOR's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while NEXT trades at $10.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check NEXT's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while BSM trades at $12.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check BSM's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CRGY trades at $9.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -29.22. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CRGY's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while NOG trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 4.14. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NOG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check NOG's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CPE trades at $35.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CPE's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while BKV trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BKV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check BKV's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while STRDW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check STRDW's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while BTE trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BTE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check BTE's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while TALO trades at $9.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check TALO's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while MNR trades at $13.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check MNR's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while KRP trades at $13.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is -232.83. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check KRP's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while HHRS trades at $15.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check HHRS's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CLMT trades at $15.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CLMT's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while FLMN trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check FLMN's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while VET trades at $7.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas VET's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check VET's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while DMLP trades at $24.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check DMLP's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while SBR trades at $72.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SBR's ROE of +8.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check SBR's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while VTS trades at $26.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check VTS's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 970M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while HPK trades at $7.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HPK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check HPK's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while SBOW trades at $36.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check SBOW's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while TELL trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check TELL's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 877.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while KOS trades at $1.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check KOS's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 767M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while TXO trades at $14.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is 48.28. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TXO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check TXO's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 752.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while GRNT trades at $5.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check GRNT's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while ROCC trades at $37.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check ROCC's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 635.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while REPX trades at $28.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check REPX's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 610.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while VTLE trades at $15.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check VTLE's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while PVAC trades at $30.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check PVAC's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 433.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while SD trades at $11.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check SD's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 412.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while EGY trades at $3.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EGY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check EGY's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 404.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while OBE trades at $6.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OBE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check OBE's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 347.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while GFR trades at $4.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GFR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check GFR's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 339.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while GPRK trades at $6.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check GPRK's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, HUSA has a market cap of 301M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while HUSA trades at $8.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas HUSA's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HUSA's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to HUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check HUSA's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 270.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while SJT trades at $5.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is 289.75. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SJT's ROE of -2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check SJT's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 266.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while WTI trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WTI's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check WTI's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 249.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while PNRG trades at $150.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check PNRG's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while BRY trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check BRY's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 209.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while INR trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check INR's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 198.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while KGEI trades at $5.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check KGEI's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 198.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while REI trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas REI's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check REI's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 188.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while EP trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EP's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check EP's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 174.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while EPM trades at $5.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -126.87. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check EPM's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while AMPY trades at $4.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check AMPY's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while PHX trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check PHX's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 144.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while GTE trades at $4.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GTE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check GTE's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while EPSN trades at $6.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EPSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check EPSN's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 109.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while IMPP trades at $3.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check IMPP's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 104M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while IMPPP trades at $25.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -66.11. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check IMPPP's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, MVO has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while MVO trades at $5.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas MVO's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MVO's ROE of +5.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to MVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check MVO's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PVL has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while PVL trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas PVL's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PVL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to PVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check PVL's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PED has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while PED trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas PED's P/E ratio is 4.14. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PED's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is less volatile compared to PED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check PED's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CRT has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while CRT trades at $8.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CRT's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRT's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to CRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check CRT's competition here

CHK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHK stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PRT has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHK is priced at $81.46, while PRT trades at $3.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas PRT's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, CHK's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHK is more volatile compared to PRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHK.Check PRT's competition here