Celanese Corporation
Celanese Corporation (CE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE | $58.70 | +2.80% | 6.4B | -3.88 | -$15.12 | +2.48% |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DOW | $25.51 | +1.76% | 18B | -18.21 | -$1.40 | +10.95% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $34.27 | +2.27% | 2.3B | 11.20 | $3.06 | +2.16% |
| HUN | $11.19 | +2.85% | 1.9B | -14.34 | -$0.78 | +8.89% |
| BAK | $3.29 | +1.54% | 1.3B | -0.79 | -$4.18 | N/A |
| TROX | $5.82 | +3.56% | 923.8M | -6.14 | -$0.95 | +8.56% |
| ASPI | $10.47 | +8.39% | 878.2M | -17.75 | -$0.59 | N/A |
| WLKP | $22.07 | +0.23% | 776.3M | 14.79 | $1.49 | +8.53% |
Stock Comparison
CE vs SHLM Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check SHLM's competition here
CE vs DOW Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while DOW trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -18.21. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check DOW's competition here
CE vs UNVR Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check UNVR's competition here
CE vs MEOH Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while MEOH trades at $34.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check MEOH's competition here
CE vs HUN Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while HUN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -14.34. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check HUN's competition here
CE vs BAK Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while BAK trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BAK's ROE of +4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check BAK's competition here
CE vs TROX Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 923.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while TROX trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check TROX's competition here
CE vs ASPI Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 878.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while ASPI trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -17.75. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check ASPI's competition here
CE vs WLKP Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 776.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while WLKP trades at $22.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check WLKP's competition here
CE vs LXU Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 612.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while LXU trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LXU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check LXU's competition here
CE vs ASIX Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 588M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while ASIX trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check ASIX's competition here
CE vs VHI Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 503.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while VHI trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VHI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check VHI's competition here
CE vs SIRE Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check SIRE's competition here
CE vs CINR Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check CINR's competition here
CE vs RYAM Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 287.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while RYAM trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check RYAM's competition here
CE vs FF Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 187.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while FF trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -28.57. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check FF's competition here
CE vs ORGN Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 115.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while ORGN trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check ORGN's competition here
CE vs FMST Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while FMST trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check FMST's competition here
CE vs ORGNW Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while ORGNW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check ORGNW's competition here
CE vs FMSTW Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while FMSTW trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check FMSTW's competition here
CE vs MKD Comparison July 2025
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $58.70, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check MKD's competition here