Celanese Corporation
Celanese Corporation (CE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE | $56.07 | -2.89% | 6.1B | -5.37 | -$10.44 | +0.21% |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.86% |
| DOW | $36.00 | -1.69% | 25.8B | -9.74 | -$3.70 | +4.76% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $50.50 | -2.42% | 3.9B | 16.95 | $2.98 | +1.41% |
| HUN | $11.80 | -1.91% | 2.1B | -7.43 | -$1.59 | +5.60% |
| BAK | $4.46 | +1.83% | 1.8B | -1.75 | -$2.56 | N/A |
| LXU | $14.78 | -0.97% | 1.1B | 43.44 | $0.34 | N/A |
| TROX | $6.68 | -4.30% | 1.1B | -2.25 | -$2.97 | +3.90% |
| WLKP | $22.03 | -1.87% | 775.4M | 15.94 | $1.38 | +8.43% |
Stock Comparison
CE vs SHLM Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check SHLM's competition here
CE vs DOW Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while DOW trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check DOW's competition here
CE vs UNVR Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check UNVR's competition here
CE vs MEOH Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while MEOH trades at $50.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check MEOH's competition here
CE vs HUN Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while HUN trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check HUN's competition here
CE vs BAK Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while BAK trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BAK's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check BAK's competition here
CE vs LXU Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while LXU trades at $14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check LXU's competition here
CE vs TROX Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while TROX trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check TROX's competition here
CE vs WLKP Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 775.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while WLKP trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check WLKP's competition here
CE vs RYAM Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 766.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while RYAM trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check RYAM's competition here
CE vs ASIX Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 545.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while ASIX trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check ASIX's competition here
CE vs SIRE Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check SIRE's competition here
CE vs ASPI Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 498.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while ASPI trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check ASPI's competition here
CE vs CINR Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check CINR's competition here
CE vs VHI Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 388.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while VHI trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check VHI's competition here
CE vs FF Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 187.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while FF trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check FF's competition here
CE vs FMST Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while FMST trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -21.60. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check FMST's competition here
CE vs ORGN Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while ORGN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check ORGN's competition here
CE vs FMSTW Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while FMSTW trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check FMSTW's competition here
CE vs ORGNW Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 396.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check ORGNW's competition here
CE vs MKD Comparison March 2026
CE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $56.07, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.37, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check MKD's competition here