CSI Compressco LP
CSI Compressco LP CCLP Peers
See (CCLP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCLP | $2.42 | +3.86% | 344.84M | -34.57 | -$0.07 | N/A |
| SLB | $34.15 | +1.16% | 46.44B | 10.98 | $3.11 | +3.17% |
| BKR | $37.91 | +0.32% | 37.56B | 12.94 | $2.93 | +2.33% |
| TS | $34.10 | -0.03% | 18.37B | 10.40 | $3.28 | +3.94% |
| HAL | $20.86 | -1.84% | 17.93B | 8.73 | $2.39 | +3.27% |
| FTI | $31.19 | -0.37% | 13.07B | 16.50 | $1.89 | +0.64% |
| CHX | $25.50 | -1.85% | 4.88B | 16.89 | $1.51 | +1.50% |
| NOV | $12.58 | -2.06% | 4.72B | 8.44 | $1.49 | +2.39% |
| AROC | $25.32 | -0.51% | 4.48B | 21.28 | $1.19 | +2.85% |
| WFRD | $47.59 | -1.84% | 3.45B | 7.58 | $6.28 | +2.12% |
Stock Comparison
CCLP vs SLB Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 46.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while SLB trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs BKR Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 37.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while BKR trades at $37.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs TS Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 18.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while TS trades at $34.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs HAL Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 17.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while HAL trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs FTI Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 13.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while FTI trades at $31.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs CHX Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while CHX trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs NOV Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NOV trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs AROC Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while AROC trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs WFRD Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while WFRD trades at $47.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs KGS Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while KGS trades at $35.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 70.98. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs WHD Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while WHD trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs USAC Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while USAC trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 36.27. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to USAC's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs VAL-WT Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while VAL-WT trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs TDW-WT Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs VAL Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while VAL trades at $37.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs NEX Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs TDW Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while TDW trades at $40.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs OII Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while OII trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs LB Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while LB trades at $84.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas LB's P/E ratio is -29.14. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs LBRT Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while LBRT trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs AESI Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while AESI trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AESI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs DNOW Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while DNOW trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DNOW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs SEI Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while SEI trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 43.70. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs NESRW Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NESRW trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs SLCA Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs PFHC Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs MRC Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while MRC trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs RES Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while RES trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs ACDC Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while ACDC trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs INVX Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while INVX trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs HLX Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 978.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while HLX trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs XPRO Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 956.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while XPRO trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs EFXT Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 890.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while EFXT trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs WTTR Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 877.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while WTTR trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs VTOL Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 851.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while VTOL trades at $29.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs NPKI Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 676.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NPKI trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NPKI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs NR Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs NESR Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 613.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NESR trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs PUMP Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 590.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while PUMP trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs CLB Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 543.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while CLB trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs DRQ Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs NOA Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 511.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NOA trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs SOI Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs FLOC Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 493.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while FLOC trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FLOC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs FTK Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 457.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while FTK trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs TTI Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 388.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while TTI trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs NGS Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 312.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NGS trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs OIS Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 282.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while OIS trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 57.06. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to OIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs RNGR Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 250.85M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while RNGR trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs FET Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 182.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while FET trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs BOOM Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 137.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while BOOM trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs PFIE Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs LSE Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 88.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while LSE trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs DTI Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 87.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while DTI trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -35.14. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs NCSM Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 81.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NCSM trades at $32.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP and NCSM have similar daily volatility (5.47).
CCLP vs SND Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 81.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while SND trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas SND's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SND's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs GEOS Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 77.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while GEOS trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs RCON Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 54.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while RCON trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs DWSN Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 39.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while DWSN trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs KLXE Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 36.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while KLXE trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs SDPI Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs NINE Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 23.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NINE trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.
CCLP vs ENSV Comparison
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.84M. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 773831.00. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while ENSV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -4.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.