CSI Compressco LP
CSI Compressco LP (CCLP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CCLP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCLP | $2.42 | +3.86% | 344.8M | -34.57 | -$0.07 | N/A |
| SLB | $32.86 | +0.21% | 49.4B | 11.26 | $2.92 | +3.42% |
| BKR | $43.43 | +1.14% | 42.7B | 14.29 | $3.03 | +2.08% |
| TS | $35.33 | -0.34% | 18.9B | 9.64 | $3.71 | +6.15% |
| HAL | $21.22 | +1.63% | 17.8B | 9.95 | $2.10 | +3.26% |
| FTI | $35.57 | +1.28% | 14.4B | 16.65 | $2.10 | +0.57% |
| CHX | $25.81 | -2.97% | 4.9B | 17.09 | $1.51 | +1.47% |
| NOV | $11.96 | +0.50% | 4.4B | 9.84 | $1.21 | +4.28% |
| AROC | $22.81 | -0.13% | 4.1B | 17.46 | $1.33 | +3.31% |
| WFRD | $55.24 | -0.09% | 4B | 8.54 | $6.49 | +1.81% |
Stock Comparison
CCLP vs SLB Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while SLB trades at $32.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check SLB's competition here
CCLP vs BKR Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while BKR trades at $43.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check BKR's competition here
CCLP vs TS Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while TS trades at $35.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check TS's competition here
CCLP vs HAL Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while HAL trades at $21.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check HAL's competition here
CCLP vs FTI Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while FTI trades at $35.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check FTI's competition here
CCLP vs CHX Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check CHX's competition here
CCLP vs NOV Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NOV trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check NOV's competition here
CCLP vs AROC Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while AROC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check AROC's competition here
CCLP vs WFRD Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while WFRD trades at $55.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check WFRD's competition here
CCLP vs LB Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while LB trades at $59.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas LB's P/E ratio is 66.95. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check LB's competition here
CCLP vs VAL Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while VAL trades at $48.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check VAL's competition here
CCLP vs VAL-WT Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while VAL-WT trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check VAL-WT's competition here
CCLP vs USAC Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while USAC trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 36.74. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to USAC's ROE of +4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check USAC's competition here
CCLP vs KGS Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while KGS trades at $31.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 35.64. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check KGS's competition here
CCLP vs TDW Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while TDW trades at $61.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check TDW's competition here
CCLP vs TDW-WT Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check TDW-WT's competition here
CCLP vs WHD Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while WHD trades at $39.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check WHD's competition here
CCLP vs NEX Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check NEX's competition here
CCLP vs OII Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while OII trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check OII's competition here
CCLP vs SEI Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while SEI trades at $31.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 50.85. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check SEI's competition here
CCLP vs LBRT Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while LBRT trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check LBRT's competition here
CCLP vs DNOW Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while DNOW trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DNOW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check DNOW's competition here
CCLP vs AESI Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while AESI trades at $12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is 97.58. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AESI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check AESI's competition here
CCLP vs FLOC Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while FLOC trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FLOC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check FLOC's competition here
CCLP vs SLCA Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check SLCA's competition here
CCLP vs PFHC Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check PFHC's competition here
CCLP vs MRC Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while MRC trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 61.35. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MRC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check MRC's competition here
CCLP vs XPRO Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while XPRO trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check XPRO's competition here
CCLP vs EFXT Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while EFXT trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check EFXT's competition here
CCLP vs INVX Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while INVX trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check INVX's competition here
CCLP vs VTOL Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while VTOL trades at $38.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check VTOL's competition here
CCLP vs RES Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while RES trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check RES's competition here
CCLP vs ACDC Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while ACDC trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check ACDC's competition here
CCLP vs WTTR Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 870.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while WTTR trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check WTTR's competition here
CCLP vs HLX Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 857.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while HLX trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check HLX's competition here
CCLP vs NPKI Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 784.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NPKI trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NPKI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check NPKI's competition here
CCLP vs NESR Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 664.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NESR trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check NESR's competition here
CCLP vs NESRW Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 639.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check NESRW's competition here
CCLP vs NR Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check NR's competition here
CCLP vs DRQ Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check DRQ's competition here
CCLP vs TTI Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 521.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while TTI trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check TTI's competition here
CCLP vs PUMP Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 500.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while PUMP trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check PUMP's competition here
CCLP vs SOI Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check SOI's competition here
CCLP vs NOA Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 482.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NOA trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check NOA's competition here
CCLP vs CLB Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 479.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while CLB trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check CLB's competition here
CCLP vs FTK Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 412.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while FTK trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check FTK's competition here
CCLP vs NGS Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NGS trades at $24.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check NGS's competition here
CCLP vs OIS Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while OIS trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 45.68. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to OIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check OIS's competition here
CCLP vs RNGR Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 275.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while RNGR trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check RNGR's competition here
CCLP vs FET Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while FET trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check FET's competition here
CCLP vs GEOS Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 185.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while GEOS trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -11.69. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check GEOS's competition here
CCLP vs BOOM Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 120.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while BOOM trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check BOOM's competition here
CCLP vs PFIE Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check PFIE's competition here
CCLP vs LSE Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 92.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while LSE trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check LSE's competition here
CCLP vs NCSM Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NCSM trades at $31.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check NCSM's competition here
CCLP vs SND Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while SND trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas SND's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SND's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check SND's competition here
CCLP vs RCON Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while RCON trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check RCON's competition here
CCLP vs DTI Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while DTI trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -29.71. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check DTI's competition here
CCLP vs DWSN Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while DWSN trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check DWSN's competition here
CCLP vs SDPI Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check SDPI's competition here
CCLP vs KLXE Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while KLXE trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check KLXE's competition here
CCLP vs NINE Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while NINE trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check NINE's competition here
CCLP vs ENSV Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 715.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while ENSV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check ENSV's competition here
CCLP vs EXTN Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is more volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check EXTN's competition here
CCLP vs ACDCW Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check ACDCW's competition here
CCLP vs CELP Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check CELP's competition here
CCLP vs FTSI Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check FTSI's competition here
CCLP vs USWS Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check USWS's competition here
CCLP vs IO Comparison August 2025
CCLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCLP stands at 344.8M. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCLP is priced at $2.42, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCLP currently has a P/E ratio of -34.57, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCLP's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CCLP is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCLP.Check IO's competition here