CalAtlantic Group, Inc.
CalAtlantic Group, Inc. (CAA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CAA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAA | $53.12 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | +0.30% |
| HD | $339.03 | +0.03% | 337.5B | 23.81 | $14.24 | +2.71% |
| LOW | $237.59 | -0.78% | 133.3B | 20.05 | $11.85 | +1.99% |
| FND | $57.00 | +2.30% | 6.2B | 29.70 | $1.92 | N/A |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ARHS | $7.10 | +0.57% | 1B | 14.79 | $0.48 | N/A |
| HVT-A | $22.70 | -7.38% | 368.2M | 19.08 | $1.19 | +6.09% |
| HVT | $21.47 | -0.42% | 353.4M | 17.99 | $1.19 | +6.09% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| TTSH | $0.00 | -100.00% | 136.4M | -30.50 | -$0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CAA vs HD Comparison March 2026
CAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAA stands at 0. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 337.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAA is priced at $53.12, while HD trades at $339.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, CAA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CAA is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAA.Check HD's competition here
CAA vs LOW Comparison March 2026
CAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAA stands at 0. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 133.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAA is priced at $53.12, while LOW trades at $237.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, CAA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CAA is more volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAA.Check LOW's competition here
CAA vs FND Comparison March 2026
CAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAA stands at 0. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAA is priced at $53.12, while FND trades at $57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 29.70. In terms of profitability, CAA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAA is more volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAA.Check FND's competition here
CAA vs MLHR Comparison March 2026
CAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAA stands at 0. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAA is priced at $53.12, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAA is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAA.Check MLHR's competition here
CAA vs ARHS Comparison March 2026
CAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAA stands at 0. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAA is priced at $53.12, while ARHS trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, CAA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAA is more volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAA.Check ARHS's competition here
CAA vs HVT-A Comparison March 2026
CAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAA stands at 0. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 368.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAA is priced at $53.12, while HVT-A trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, CAA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAA is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAA.Check HVT-A's competition here
CAA vs HVT Comparison March 2026
CAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAA stands at 0. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 353.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAA is priced at $53.12, while HVT trades at $21.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, CAA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAA is more volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAA.Check HVT's competition here
CAA vs EMPG Comparison March 2026
CAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAA stands at 0. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, CAA is priced at $53.12, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, CAA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CAA is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAA.Check EMPG's competition here
CAA vs TTSH Comparison March 2026
CAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAA stands at 0. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 136.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAA is priced at $53.12, while TTSH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, CAA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CAA has daily volatility of 3.75 and TTSH has daily volatility of N/A.Check TTSH's competition here
CAA vs LIVE Comparison March 2026
CAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAA stands at 0. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, CAA is priced at $53.12, while LIVE trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, CAA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LIVE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAA is more volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAA.Check LIVE's competition here
CAA vs PFAI Comparison March 2026
CAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAA stands at 0. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAA is priced at $53.12, while PFAI trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is -120.00. In terms of profitability, CAA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CAA is less volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAA.Check PFAI's competition here
CAA vs LL Comparison March 2026
CAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAA stands at 0. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAA is priced at $53.12, while LL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CAA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CAA is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAA.Check LL's competition here
CAA vs LESL Comparison March 2026
CAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAA stands at 0. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, CAA is priced at $53.12, while LESL trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CAA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CAA is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAA.Check LESL's competition here
CAA vs FLE Comparison March 2026
CAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAA stands at 0. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAA is priced at $53.12, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAA is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAA.Check FLE's competition here
CAA vs HBP Comparison March 2026
CAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAA stands at 0. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAA is priced at $53.12, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, CAA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CAA is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAA.Check HBP's competition here