BrightView Holdings, Inc.
BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BV | $12.09 | +2.37% | 1.1B | 172.64 | $0.07 | N/A |
| CTAS | $192.74 | -0.79% | 77.5B | 41.72 | $4.62 | +0.90% |
| TRI | $96.13 | -0.22% | 42.8B | 29.22 | $3.29 | +2.56% |
| CPRT | $33.88 | -0.62% | 32.8B | 21.31 | $1.59 | N/A |
| RBA | $99.03 | +0.35% | 18.4B | 48.55 | $2.04 | +1.22% |
| ULS | $85.18 | +2.36% | 17.1B | 53.23 | $1.60 | +0.63% |
| RTO | $32.12 | -0.66% | 16.2B | 56.34 | $0.57 | +1.73% |
| GPN | $68.05 | -0.90% | 16.1B | 15.37 | $4.43 | +1.47% |
| BIPI | $0.00 | -100.00% | 13.1B | N/A | N/A | +7.77% |
| ARMK | $40.45 | +1.13% | 10.6B | 33.99 | $1.19 | +1.10% |
Stock Comparison
BV vs CTAS Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 77.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while CTAS trades at $192.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 41.72. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check CTAS's competition here
BV vs TRI Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while TRI trades at $96.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check TRI's competition here
BV vs CPRT Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while CPRT trades at $33.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check CPRT's competition here
BV vs RBA Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while RBA trades at $99.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 48.55. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check RBA's competition here
BV vs ULS Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while ULS trades at $85.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 53.23. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check ULS's competition here
BV vs RTO Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while RTO trades at $32.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 56.34. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check RTO's competition here
BV vs GPN Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while GPN trades at $68.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check GPN's competition here
BV vs BIPI Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while BIPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BV has daily volatility of 2.82 and BIPI has daily volatility of N/A.Check BIPI's competition here
BV vs ARMK Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while ARMK trades at $40.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 33.99. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check ARMK's competition here
BV vs IAA Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check IAA's competition here
BV vs UNF Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while UNF trades at $273.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 36.14. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check UNF's competition here
BV vs MMS Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while MMS trades at $71.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check MMS's competition here
BV vs ABM Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while ABM trades at $38.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check ABM's competition here
BV vs FA Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while FA trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -51.55. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check FA's competition here
BV vs TIC Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while TIC trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -8.18. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to TIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check TIC's competition here
BV vs CBZ Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while CBZ trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check CBZ's competition here
BV vs VVI Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check VVI's competition here
BV vs LZ Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while LZ trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 76.25. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check LZ's competition here
BV vs SP Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check SP's competition here
BV vs RHLD Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while RHLD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RHLD's ROE of +15.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BV has daily volatility of 2.82 and RHLD has daily volatility of N/A.Check RHLD's competition here
BV vs TDCX Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check TDCX's competition here
BV vs PRSU Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while PRSU trades at $36.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 41.09. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check PRSU's competition here
BV vs TH Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 908M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while TH trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -91.00. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check TH's competition here
BV vs KODK Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 600.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while KODK trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -22.62. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check KODK's competition here
BV vs CASS Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 583.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while CASS trades at $44.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check CASS's competition here
BV vs ACTG Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 475.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while ACTG trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is 82.17. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACTG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check ACTG's competition here
BV vs PPHC Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 372.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while PPHC trades at $13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check PPHC's competition here
BV vs CVEO Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 357.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while CVEO trades at $28.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -17.79. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check CVEO's competition here
BV vs SPIR Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 352.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while SPIR trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is 30.46. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SPIR's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check SPIR's competition here
BV vs QUAD Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 336.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while QUAD trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check QUAD's competition here
BV vs PFMT Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PFMT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check PFMT's competition here
BV vs RHLDV Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check RHLDV's competition here
BV vs PFSW Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check PFSW's competition here
BV vs ARC Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check ARC's competition here
BV vs BUUU Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 142M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while BUUU trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is 173.71. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check BUUU's competition here
BV vs ANPA Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 108.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while ANPA trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 871.00. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check ANPA's competition here
BV vs DLHC Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while DLHC trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check DLHC's competition here
BV vs TISI Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while TISI trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TISI's ROE of -18.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check TISI's competition here
BV vs OMEX Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while OMEX trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check OMEX's competition here
BV vs NTIP Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while NTIP trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -13.36. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check NTIP's competition here
BV vs YSXT Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while YSXT trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check YSXT's competition here
BV vs SMX Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while SMX trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMX's ROE of -3.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check SMX's competition here
BV vs PMEC Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while PMEC trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check PMEC's competition here
BV vs THH Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while THH trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check THH's competition here
BV vs ZGM Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while ZGM trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check ZGM's competition here
BV vs SST Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while SST trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SST's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check SST's competition here
BV vs SGRP Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while SGRP trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check SGRP's competition here
BV vs WHLM Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while WHLM trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check WHLM's competition here
BV vs ATTO Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check ATTO's competition here
BV vs CRE Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while CRE trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to CRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check CRE's competition here
BV vs MSGY Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while MSGY trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check MSGY's competition here
BV vs LICN Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while LICN trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check LICN's competition here
BV vs SFHG Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while SFHG trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -6.66. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check SFHG's competition here
BV vs PMAX Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 935.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while PMAX trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check PMAX's competition here
BV vs VSA Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 654.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while VSA trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VSA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check VSA's competition here
BV vs THWWW Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check THWWW's competition here
BV vs BLMZ Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check BLMZ's competition here
BV vs GPAK Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 20.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check GPAK's competition here
BV vs PAE Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check PAE's competition here
BV vs INTX Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to INTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check INTX's competition here
BV vs RRD Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check RRD's competition here
BV vs PAEWW Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check PAEWW's competition here
BV vs ALJJ Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check ALJJ's competition here
BV vs CRN Comparison March 2026
BV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BV stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BV is priced at $12.09, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BV currently has a P/E ratio of 172.64, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BV's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BV is less volatile compared to CRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BV.Check CRN's competition here