Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc.
Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc. (BDR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BDR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDR | $0.31 | +1.46% | 0 | -5.87 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| CSCO | $77.76 | -1.02% | 312.9B | 28.49 | $2.78 | +2.07% |
| MSI | $463.29 | +2.12% | 77.1B | 36.23 | $12.77 | +0.97% |
| LITE | $670.56 | +5.49% | 47.7B | 195.25 | $3.42 | N/A |
| CIEN | $336.86 | +5.79% | 47.4B | 389.63 | $0.86 | N/A |
| UI | $737.95 | +2.67% | 45.4B | 51.20 | $14.64 | +0.40% |
| NOK | $7.64 | +0.46% | 41.9B | 59.73 | $0.13 | +1.84% |
| ERIC | $11.16 | -0.80% | 37.8B | 11.93 | $0.95 | +2.15% |
| SATS | $108.90 | -5.17% | 31.8B | -2.45 | -$45.02 | N/A |
| HPE | $20.57 | -3.83% | 28.5B | -534.00 | -$0.04 | +2.49% |
Stock Comparison
BDR vs CSCO Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 312.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while CSCO trades at $77.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check CSCO's competition here
BDR vs MSI Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while MSI trades at $463.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 36.23. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MSI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check MSI's competition here
BDR vs LITE Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while LITE trades at $670.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is 195.25. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LITE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check LITE's competition here
BDR vs CIEN Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while CIEN trades at $336.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 389.63. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check CIEN's competition here
BDR vs UI Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while UI trades at $737.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 51.20. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UI's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check UI's competition here
BDR vs NOK Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while NOK trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 59.73. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check NOK's competition here
BDR vs ERIC Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while ERIC trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check ERIC's competition here
BDR vs SATS Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while SATS trades at $108.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check SATS's competition here
BDR vs HPE Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while HPE trades at $20.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is -534.00. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check HPE's competition here
BDR vs ASTS Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while ASTS trades at $81.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -70.35. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check ASTS's competition here
BDR vs CRDO Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while CRDO trades at $121.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 104.25. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check CRDO's competition here
BDR vs JNPR Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while JNPR trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check JNPR's competition here
BDR vs ZBRA Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while ZBRA trades at $242.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check ZBRA's competition here
BDR vs VIAV Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while VIAV trades at $26.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is -144.89. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIAV's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check VIAV's competition here
BDR vs VSAT Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while VSAT trades at $44.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check VSAT's competition here
BDR vs BDC Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while BDC trades at $143.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check BDC's competition here
BDR vs ONDS Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while ONDS trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -27.86. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ONDS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check ONDS's competition here
BDR vs VISN Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, VISN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while VISN trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas VISN's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VISN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to VISN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check VISN's competition here
BDR vs COMM Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while COMM trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COMM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check COMM's competition here
BDR vs MAXR Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check MAXR's competition here
BDR vs PI Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while PI trades at $122.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -345.73. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check PI's competition here
BDR vs KN Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while KN trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 47.48. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check KN's competition here
BDR vs DGII Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while DGII trades at $48.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 44.82. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check DGII's competition here
BDR vs EXTR Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while EXTR trades at $13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is 234.17. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EXTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check EXTR's competition here
BDR vs INFN Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INFN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check INFN's competition here
BDR vs HLIT Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while HLIT trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLIT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check HLIT's competition here
BDR vs SWIR Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check SWIR's competition here
BDR vs ITRN Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 970M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while ITRN trades at $47.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check ITRN's competition here
BDR vs GILT Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 878.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while GILT trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check GILT's competition here
BDR vs ADTN Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 806.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while ADTN trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check ADTN's competition here
BDR vs POLY Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check POLY's competition here
BDR vs NTGR Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 592.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while NTGR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is -33.13. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NTGR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check NTGR's competition here
BDR vs AIOT Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 508.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while AIOT trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -16.48. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check AIOT's competition here
BDR vs PWFL Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check PWFL's competition here
BDR vs FEIM Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 474.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while FEIM trades at $46.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check FEIM's competition here
BDR vs CLFD Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 450.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while CLFD trades at $31.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is 72.27. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check CLFD's competition here
BDR vs TSAT Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 442.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while TSAT trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check TSAT's competition here
BDR vs BKTI Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 320.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while BKTI trades at $84.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check BKTI's competition here
BDR vs AVNW Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 318.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while AVNW trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVNW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check AVNW's competition here
BDR vs ITI Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check ITI's competition here
BDR vs SATX Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while SATX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check SATX's competition here
BDR vs LTRX Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 237.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while LTRX trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check LTRX's competition here
BDR vs AUDC Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 207.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while AUDC trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check AUDC's competition here
BDR vs CRNT Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 206.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while CRNT trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 115.00. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check CRNT's competition here
BDR vs INSG Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while INSG trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INSG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check INSG's competition here
BDR vs CMTL Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 165.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while CMTL trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check CMTL's competition here
BDR vs PCTI Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check PCTI's competition here
BDR vs KVHI Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 117.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while KVHI trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check KVHI's competition here
BDR vs SILC Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 115M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while SILC trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check SILC's competition here
BDR vs TESS Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check TESS's competition here
BDR vs JCS Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JCS's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check JCS's competition here
BDR vs AIRG Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while AIRG trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check AIRG's competition here
BDR vs MOB Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while MOB trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOB's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check MOB's competition here
BDR vs AMPG Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while AMPG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check AMPG's competition here
BDR vs OCC Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while OCC trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -32.61. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check OCC's competition here
BDR vs FKWL Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 46.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while FKWL trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -395.00. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FKWL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check FKWL's competition here
BDR vs WTT Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check WTT's competition here
BDR vs SYTA Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while SYTA trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check SYTA's competition here
BDR vs CMBM Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while CMBM trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMBM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check CMBM's competition here
BDR vs BOSC Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while BOSC trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check BOSC's competition here
BDR vs FIEE Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, FIEE has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while FIEE trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas FIEE's P/E ratio is -59.17. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FIEE's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to FIEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check FIEE's competition here
BDR vs MOBBW Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while MOBBW trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check MOBBW's competition here
BDR vs UTSI Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while UTSI trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check UTSI's competition here
BDR vs MINM Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while MINM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MINM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check MINM's competition here
BDR vs CLRO Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while CLRO trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check CLRO's competition here
BDR vs SYNX Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while SYNX trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check SYNX's competition here
BDR vs MITQ Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while MITQ trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -20.68. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check MITQ's competition here
BDR vs IOTR Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while IOTR trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check IOTR's competition here
BDR vs SONM Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while SONM trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SONM's ROE of +15.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check SONM's competition here
BDR vs VISL Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while VISL trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VISL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check VISL's competition here
BDR vs CASA Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check CASA's competition here
BDR vs MYNA Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check MYNA's competition here
BDR vs AMPGW Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while AMPGW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check AMPGW's competition here
BDR vs DZSI Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while DZSI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check DZSI's competition here
BDR vs ASNS Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 184K. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while ASNS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check ASNS's competition here
BDR vs SYTAW Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 55.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while SYTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check SYTAW's competition here
BDR vs EXFO Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check EXFO's competition here
BDR vs ZXZZT Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while ZXZZT trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check ZXZZT's competition here
BDR vs RKUS Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, RKUS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while RKUS trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas RKUS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RKUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to RKUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check RKUS's competition here
BDR vs GIMO Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, GIMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while GIMO trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas GIMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GIMO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to GIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check GIMO's competition here
BDR vs SATX-WTA Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check SATX-WTA's competition here
BDR vs VCRA Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check VCRA's competition here
BDR vs ORBC Comparison February 2026
BDR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDR stands at 0. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BDR is priced at $0.31, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.87, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BDR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BDR is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDR.Check ORBC's competition here