Battalion Oil Corporation
Battalion Oil Corporation BATL Peers
See (BATL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATL | $1.33 | +1.14% | 21.89M | -0.34 | -$3.90 | N/A |
| COP | $92.57 | -1.70% | 116.85B | 11.73 | $7.89 | +2.53% |
| CNQ | $31.40 | -2.58% | 65.92B | 12.27 | $2.56 | +4.99% |
| EOG | $115.56 | -0.93% | 63.07B | 10.70 | $10.80 | +3.26% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63.00B | 13.33 | $20.22 | N/A |
| CEO | $121.76 | N/A | 53.21B | 10.59 | $11.50 | N/A |
| OXY | $43.81 | -1.31% | 43.11B | 17.74 | $2.47 | +2.05% |
| FANG | $144.82 | -0.92% | 42.31B | 9.01 | $16.08 | +2.92% |
| OXY-WT | $22.95 | -2.05% | 42.28B | N/A | N/A | +2.05% |
| HES | $134.69 | -0.74% | 41.66B | 18.68 | $7.21 | +1.44% |
Stock Comparison
BATL vs COP Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 116.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while COP trades at $92.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CNQ Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 65.92B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CNQ trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs EOG Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 63.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while EOG trades at $115.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs PXD Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CEO Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 53.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs OXY Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 43.11B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while OXY trades at $43.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs FANG Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 42.31B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while FANG trades at $144.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs OXY-WT Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 42.28B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while OXY-WT trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs HES Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 41.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while HES trades at $134.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs EQT Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 33.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while EQT trades at $56.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 92.34. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs TPL Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 32.31B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while TPL trades at $1,405.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 70.30. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs WDS Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 27.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while WDS trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs EXE Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 26.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while EXE trades at $113.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to EXE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs DVN Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 21.81B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while DVN trades at $33.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CTRA Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 19.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CTRA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs COG Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs MRO Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 15.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs AR Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 12.57B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while AR trades at $40.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 52.58. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CHK Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.70B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs OVV Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 10.13B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while OVV trades at $38.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs PR Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 9.67B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while PR trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs RRC Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 9.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while RRC trades at $40.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 36.40. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CHKEW Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.44B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CHKEZ Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.41B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CHKEL Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs SWN Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.84B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SWN's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CRK Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CRK trades at $23.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is -20.35. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CRK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs APA Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 6.56B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while APA trades at $18.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs MTDR Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 5.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while MTDR trades at $45.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CHRD Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 5.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CHRD trades at $97.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CPG Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CPG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs VIST Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 4.89B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while VIST trades at $51.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CNX Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CNX trades at $32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is -16.41. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CNX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs OAS Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs DEN Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs BCEI Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs MGY Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while MGY trades at $23.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CDEV Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs ERF Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while ERF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CRC Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CRC trades at $43.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CRC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs VRN Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.68B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs GPOR Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while GPOR trades at $196.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is -11.46. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GPOR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs MUR Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while MUR trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CRGY Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CRGY trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs ESTE Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs NOG Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while NOG trades at $29.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to NOG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs BSM Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while BSM trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CIVI Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CIVI trades at $31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs SM Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while SM trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CPE Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs NEXT Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while NEXT trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs STRDW Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs BKV Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while BKV trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BKV's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs MNR Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while MNR trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs KRP Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while KRP trades at $13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 343.25. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs TALO Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while TALO trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is 39.36. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to TALO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs HHRS Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs BTE Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while BTE trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BTE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs DMLP Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while DMLP trades at $28.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs HPK Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while HPK trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to HPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs FLMN Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CLMT Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CLMT trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs VET Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while VET trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -47.23. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs SBR Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 969.52M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while SBR trades at $66.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SBR's ROE of +6.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs KOS Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 953.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while KOS trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -66.50. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs SBOW Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while SBOW trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs TELL Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 892.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs VTS Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 874.99M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while VTS trades at $22.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to VTS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs GRNT Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 742.10M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while GRNT trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 62.89. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GRNT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs ROCC Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.26M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs VTLE Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 701.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while VTLE trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs TXO Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 632.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while TXO trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to TXO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs REPX Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 629.20M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while REPX trades at $28.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs PVAC Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs SD Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 385.76M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while SD trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs EGY Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 375.66M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while EGY trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to EGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs OBE Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 365.85M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while OBE trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to OBE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs GPRK Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 357.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while GPRK trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs PNRG Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 304.39M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while PNRG trades at $182.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs GFR Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 297.87M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while GFR trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GFR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs INR Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 281.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while INR trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs SJT Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 260.08M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while SJT trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is 50.73. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SJT's ROE of +1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs KGEI Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 247.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while KGEI trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs BRY Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 231.24M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while BRY trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs WTI Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 229.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while WTI trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to WTI's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs REI Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 183.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while REI trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas REI's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to REI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs GTE Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 179.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while GTE trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -11.52. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GTE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs PHX Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 163.82M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while PHX trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs EPM Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 154.49M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while EPM trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is 112.75. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to EPM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs EPSN Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 150.16M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while EPSN trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 75.78. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to EPSN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs EP Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 134.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while EP trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -7.39. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to EP's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs AMPY Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 120.40M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while AMPY trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs HPKEW Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, HPKEW has a market cap of 106.78M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while HPKEW trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas HPKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to HPKEW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to HPKEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs IMPPP Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 95.36M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while IMPPP trades at $24.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -62.02. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs IMPP Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 88.45M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while IMPP trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs MVO Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, MVO has a market cap of 67.73M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while MVO trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MVO's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MVO's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to MVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs PED Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, PED has a market cap of 60.31M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while PED trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PED's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PED's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to PED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs CRT Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, CRT has a market cap of 59.70M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while CRT trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CRT's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CRT's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is more volatile compared to CRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.
BATL vs VOC Comparison
BATL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BATL stands at 21.89M. In comparison, VOC has a market cap of 53.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BATL is priced at $1.33, while VOC trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BATL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas VOC's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, BATL's ROE is -0.47%, compared to VOC's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, BATL is less volatile compared to VOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BATL.