Actelis Networks, Inc.
Actelis Networks, Inc. (ASNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ASNS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASNS | $0.48 | +2.13% | 4.4M | -0.62 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| CSCO | $67.32 | +0.45% | 266.6B | 25.79 | $2.61 | +2.42% |
| MSI | $461.91 | -0.11% | 76.9B | 37.10 | $12.44 | +0.92% |
| UI | $510.23 | +30.64% | 30.9B | 56.34 | $9.06 | +0.47% |
| HPE | $22.45 | +2.89% | 29.5B | 21.61 | $1.04 | +2.31% |
| ERIC | $7.93 | +3.12% | 26.4B | 14.69 | $0.54 | +3.44% |
| NOK | $4.31 | +1.77% | 23.2B | 22.74 | $0.19 | +3.58% |
| CRDO | $114.04 | +2.87% | 19.6B | 393.24 | $0.29 | N/A |
| ZBRA | $322.79 | +4.63% | 16.4B | 30.45 | $10.60 | N/A |
| ASTS | $47.07 | +4.65% | 14.1B | -25.31 | -$1.86 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ASNS vs CSCO Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 266.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while CSCO trades at $67.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CSCO's competition here
ASNS vs MSI Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while MSI trades at $461.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 37.10. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to MSI's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check MSI's competition here
ASNS vs UI Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while UI trades at $510.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 56.34. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to UI's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check UI's competition here
ASNS vs HPE Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while HPE trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check HPE's competition here
ASNS vs ERIC Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while ERIC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ERIC's competition here
ASNS vs NOK Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while NOK trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check NOK's competition here
ASNS vs CRDO Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while CRDO trades at $114.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 393.24. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CRDO's competition here
ASNS vs ZBRA Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while ZBRA trades at $322.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ZBRA's competition here
ASNS vs ASTS Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while ASTS trades at $47.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -25.31. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ASTS's competition here
ASNS vs JNPR Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while JNPR trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check JNPR's competition here
ASNS vs CIEN Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while CIEN trades at $89.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 122.99. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CIEN's competition here
ASNS vs SATS Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while SATS trades at $29.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -27.94. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SATS's competition here
ASNS vs LITE Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while LITE trades at $119.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is 314.05. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to LITE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check LITE's competition here
ASNS vs BDC Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while BDC trades at $131.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check BDC's competition here
ASNS vs PI Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while PI trades at $176.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -2947.00. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to PI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check PI's competition here
ASNS vs MAXR Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check MAXR's competition here
ASNS vs VSAT Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while VSAT trades at $27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -6.01. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check VSAT's competition here
ASNS vs COMM Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while COMM trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is 57.81. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to COMM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check COMM's competition here
ASNS vs EXTR Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while EXTR trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is -344.50. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to EXTR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check EXTR's competition here
ASNS vs VIAV Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while VIAV trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 74.00. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to VIAV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check VIAV's competition here
ASNS vs KN Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while KN trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 71.87. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check KN's competition here
ASNS vs INFN Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to INFN's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check INFN's competition here
ASNS vs DGII Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while DGII trades at $34.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check DGII's competition here
ASNS vs SWIR Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SWIR's competition here
ASNS vs HLIT Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while HLIT trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to HLIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check HLIT's competition here
ASNS vs NTGR Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 797.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while NTGR trades at $27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to NTGR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check NTGR's competition here
ASNS vs POLY Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check POLY's competition here
ASNS vs ONDS Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 784.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while ONDS trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -8.80. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to ONDS's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ONDS's competition here
ASNS vs ITRN Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 738.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while ITRN trades at $37.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ITRN's competition here
ASNS vs ADTN Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 734.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while ADTN trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ADTN's competition here
ASNS vs AIOT Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 629.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while AIOT trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -15.73. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check AIOT's competition here
ASNS vs GILT Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 535.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while GILT trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check GILT's competition here
ASNS vs PWFL Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check PWFL's competition here
ASNS vs CLFD Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 454.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while CLFD trades at $32.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is 3291.00. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to CLFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CLFD's competition here
ASNS vs ITI Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ITI's competition here
ASNS vs TSAT Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 307.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while TSAT trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check TSAT's competition here
ASNS vs AVNW Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 295.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while AVNW trades at $23.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is -122.05. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to AVNW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check AVNW's competition here
ASNS vs FEIM Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 282.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while FEIM trades at $29.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check FEIM's competition here
ASNS vs AUDC Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 275.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while AUDC trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check AUDC's competition here
ASNS vs BKTI Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 271.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while BKTI trades at $72.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check BKTI's competition here
ASNS vs SATX Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while SATX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SATX's competition here
ASNS vs CRNT Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 176.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while CRNT trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to CRNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CRNT's competition here
ASNS vs INSG Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while INSG trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to INSG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check INSG's competition here
ASNS vs PCTI Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check PCTI's competition here
ASNS vs LTRX Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 134.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while LTRX trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -15.77. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check LTRX's competition here
ASNS vs KVHI Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while KVHI trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -16.84. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check KVHI's competition here
ASNS vs SILC Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while SILC trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SILC's competition here
ASNS vs TESS Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check TESS's competition here
ASNS vs JCS Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to JCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check JCS's competition here
ASNS vs AMPG Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while AMPG trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check AMPG's competition here
ASNS vs CMTL Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 60.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while CMTL trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CMTL's competition here
ASNS vs AMPGW Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while AMPGW trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check AMPGW's competition here
ASNS vs AIRG Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while AIRG trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check AIRG's competition here
ASNS vs FKWL Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while FKWL trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -30.57. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check FKWL's competition here
ASNS vs OCC Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 46.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while OCC trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -14.87. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check OCC's competition here
ASNS vs WTT Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check WTT's competition here
ASNS vs MOB Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while MOB trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to MOB's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check MOB's competition here
ASNS vs BOSC Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while BOSC trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check BOSC's competition here
ASNS vs SYTA Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while SYTA trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SYTA's competition here
ASNS vs CMBM Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while CMBM trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to CMBM's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CMBM's competition here
ASNS vs SYTAW Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while SYTAW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SYTAW's competition here
ASNS vs UTSI Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while UTSI trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check UTSI's competition here
ASNS vs MINM Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while MINM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to MINM's ROE of -3.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check MINM's competition here
ASNS vs SYNX Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while SYNX trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SYNX's competition here
ASNS vs IOTR Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while IOTR trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -39.02. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check IOTR's competition here
ASNS vs SONM Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while SONM trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to SONM's ROE of -17.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SONM's competition here
ASNS vs CLRO Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while CLRO trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CLRO's competition here
ASNS vs MITQ Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while MITQ trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check MITQ's competition here
ASNS vs VISL Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while VISL trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to VISL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check VISL's competition here
ASNS vs AKTS Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, AKTS has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while AKTS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas AKTS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to AKTS's ROE of +5.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to AKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check AKTS's competition here
ASNS vs MOBBW Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while MOBBW trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check MOBBW's competition here
ASNS vs BOXL Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while BOXL trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check BOXL's competition here
ASNS vs CASA Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CASA's competition here
ASNS vs MYNA Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check MYNA's competition here
ASNS vs DZSI Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while DZSI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check DZSI's competition here
ASNS vs ZXZZT Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while ZXZZT trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ZXZZT's competition here
ASNS vs EXFO Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check EXFO's competition here
ASNS vs SATX-WTA Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SATX-WTA's competition here
ASNS vs ORBC Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ORBC's competition here
ASNS vs VCRA Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check VCRA's competition here
ASNS vs BDR Comparison August 2025
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 4.4M. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.48, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -2.46%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is less volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check BDR's competition here