Arhaus, Inc.

ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 375.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $9.22, while HD trades at $377.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.49, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HD's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check HD's competition here

ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 128.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $9.22, while LOW trades at $230.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.49, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check LOW's competition here

ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $9.22, while FND trades at $78.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.49, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check FND's competition here

ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $9.22, while MLHR trades at $38.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.49, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MLHR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check MLHR's competition here

ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 363M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $9.22, while HVT-A trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.49, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check HVT-A's competition here

ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 341.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $9.22, while HVT trades at $21.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.49, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check HVT's competition here

ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 292.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $9.22, while TTSH trades at $6.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.49, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is 653.00. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TTSH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check TTSH's competition here

ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 76.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $9.22, while LESL trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.49, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check LESL's competition here

ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $9.22, while LIVE trades at $15.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.49, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LIVE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is less volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check LIVE's competition here

ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $9.22, while LL trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.49, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check LL's competition here

ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $9.22, while PFAI trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.49, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is 91.00. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is less volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check PFAI's competition here

ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $9.22, while HBP trades at $10.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.49, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check HBP's competition here