Arhaus, Inc.
Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ARHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARHS | $8.87 | +0.00% | 1.3B | 17.65 | $0.52 | N/A |
| HD | $378.58 | +0.00% | 380.6B | 26.09 | $14.65 | +2.41% |
| LOW | $278.18 | +0.00% | 157.2B | 23.54 | $11.91 | +1.69% |
| FND | $66.12 | +0.00% | 7.4B | 34.49 | $2.00 | N/A |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HVT-A | $26.67 | +0.00% | 469.8M | 24.68 | $1.17 | +4.93% |
| HVT | $25.94 | -0.02% | 425.7M | 22.37 | $1.17 | +4.93% |
| TTSH | $3.63 | +0.00% | 156.1M | -87.25 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| LIVE | $18.01 | -1.15% | 53.3M | 3.52 | $4.93 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ARHS vs HD Comparison February 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 380.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $8.87, while HD trades at $378.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check HD's competition here
ARHS vs LOW Comparison February 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 157.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $8.87, while LOW trades at $278.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check LOW's competition here
ARHS vs FND Comparison February 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $8.87, while FND trades at $66.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check FND's competition here
ARHS vs MLHR Comparison February 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $8.87, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check MLHR's competition here
ARHS vs HVT-A Comparison February 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 469.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $8.87, while HVT-A trades at $26.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check HVT-A's competition here
ARHS vs HVT Comparison February 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 425.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $8.87, while HVT trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check HVT's competition here
ARHS vs TTSH Comparison February 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 156.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $8.87, while TTSH trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -87.25. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is less volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check TTSH's competition here
ARHS vs EMPG Comparison February 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $8.87, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check EMPG's competition here
ARHS vs LIVE Comparison February 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $8.87, while LIVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LIVE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check LIVE's competition here
ARHS vs PFAI Comparison February 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $8.87, while PFAI trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is -112.50. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check PFAI's competition here
ARHS vs LL Comparison February 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $8.87, while LL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check LL's competition here
ARHS vs LESL Comparison February 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $8.87, while LESL trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check LESL's competition here
ARHS vs HBP Comparison February 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $8.87, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check HBP's competition here
ARHS vs CAA Comparison February 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $8.87, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check CAA's competition here
ARHS vs FLE Comparison February 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $8.87, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check FLE's competition here