Antero Resources Corporation

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 136.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while COP trades at $111.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check COP's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CNQ trades at $42.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CNQ's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while EOG trades at $123.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check EOG's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while PXD trades at $269.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check PXD's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while OXY trades at $51.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check OXY's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while FANG trades at $174.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check FANG's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while HES trades at $148.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check HES's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while EQT trades at $59.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check EQT's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while WDS trades at $19.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check WDS's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while TPL trades at $486.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 72.29. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check TPL's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while OXY-WT trades at $29.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check OXY-WT's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while DVN trades at $44.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check DVN's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while EXE trades at $103.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check EXE's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CTRA trades at $31.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CTRA's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while COG trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check COG's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while MRO trades at $28.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check MRO's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while PR trades at $17.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check PR's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while OVV trades at $50.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 54.35. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check OVV's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CHK trades at $81.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CHK's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while APA trades at $29.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check APA's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CHKEW's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while RRC trades at $39.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check RRC's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CHKEZ's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CHKEL's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while SWN trades at $7.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check SWN's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while MTDR trades at $52.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check MTDR's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while VIST trades at $59.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check VIST's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CHRD trades at $104.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CHRD's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CEO trades at $121.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CEO's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CRK trades at $19.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CRK's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CNX trades at $40.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CNX's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CPG trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CPG's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CRC trades at $59.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CRC's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while MGY trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check MGY's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while MUR trades at $34.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 46.85. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check MUR's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while OAS trades at $109.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check OAS's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while DEN trades at $88.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check DEN's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while BCEI trades at $54.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check BCEI's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CDEV trades at $7.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CDEV's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while ERF trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check ERF's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while GPOR trades at $201.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is -372.67. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check GPOR's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while VRN trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check VRN's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while BSM trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check BSM's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while BKV trades at $31.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 65.31. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check BKV's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while ESTE trades at $21.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check ESTE's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while BTE trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check BTE's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while NOG trades at $27.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NOG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check NOG's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while SM trades at $23.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 3.74. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check SM's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CRGY trades at $10.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -34.56. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CRGY's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CLMT trades at $29.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CLMT's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CPE trades at $35.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CPE's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while TALO trades at $13.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check TALO's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while CIVI trades at $27.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check CIVI's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while STRDW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check STRDW's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while VET trades at $10.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas VET's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check VET's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while MNR trades at $13.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check MNR's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while KRP trades at $14.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is -159.50. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check KRP's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while HHRS trades at $15.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check HHRS's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while NEXT trades at $5.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check NEXT's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while DMLP trades at $25.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check DMLP's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while FLMN trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check FLMN's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while KOS trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check KOS's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while SBR trades at $71.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check SBR's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while SBOW trades at $36.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check SBOW's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while TELL trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check TELL's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 879.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while VTS trades at $22.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 44.57. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VTS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check VTS's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 855.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while IMPPP trades at $25.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -65.80. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check IMPPP's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while ROCC trades at $37.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check ROCC's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 695.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while TXO trades at $12.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is 31.73. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check TXO's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while VTLE trades at $17.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check VTLE's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 686.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while GRNT trades at $5.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRNT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check GRNT's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 674.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while TBN trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check TBN's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 665.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while HPK trades at $5.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check HPK's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 647.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while SD trades at $17.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check SD's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 621.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while REPX trades at $28.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check REPX's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while PVAC trades at $30.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check PVAC's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 537.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while EGY trades at $5.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check EGY's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 534.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while OBE trades at $7.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check OBE's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 444.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while GPRK trades at $8.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check GPRK's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 426.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while GFR trades at $6.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GFR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check GFR's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 398.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while WTI trades at $2.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WTI's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check WTI's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 310.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while PNRG trades at $182.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check PNRG's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 283.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while REI trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -17.12. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check REI's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 265.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while INR trades at $16.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas INR's P/E ratio is -19.52. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check INR's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 256.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while SJT trades at $5.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -550.00. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SJT's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check SJT's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while BRY trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check BRY's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while GTE trades at $6.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check GTE's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 230.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while AMPY trades at $5.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMPY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check AMPY's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while PHX trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check PHX's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 154.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while EPM trades at $4.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is 55.25. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check EPM's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 143.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while IMPP trades at $3.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check IMPP's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while KGEI trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check KGEI's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 110M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while EPSN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check EPSN's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while ANNA trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is -13.74. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANNA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check ANNA's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 103.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while EP trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check EP's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, NRT has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while NRT trades at $8.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas NRT's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NRT's ROE of +4.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to NRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check NRT's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, HUSA has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while HUSA trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas HUSA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUSA's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to HUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check HUSA's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, BATL has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while BATL trades at $4.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas BATL's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BATL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to BATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check BATL's competition here

AR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AR stands at 11B. In comparison, INDO has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AR is priced at $35.03, while INDO trades at $4.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.51, whereas INDO's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, AR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AR is less volatile compared to INDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AR.Check INDO's competition here