AmpliTech Group, Inc.
AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPGW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMPGW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMPGW | $0.08 | +25.57% | 1.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CSCO | $77.29 | -1.62% | 312.9B | 28.49 | $2.78 | +2.07% |
| MSI | $465.87 | +2.69% | 77.1B | 36.23 | $12.77 | +0.97% |
| LITE | $670.36 | +5.46% | 47.7B | 195.25 | $3.42 | N/A |
| CIEN | $336.65 | +5.73% | 47.4B | 389.63 | $0.86 | N/A |
| UI | $736.51 | +2.47% | 45.4B | 51.20 | $14.64 | +0.40% |
| NOK | $7.59 | -0.13% | 41.9B | 59.73 | $0.13 | +1.84% |
| ERIC | $11.12 | -1.17% | 37.8B | 11.93 | $0.95 | +2.15% |
| SATS | $108.58 | -5.45% | 31.8B | -2.45 | -$45.02 | N/A |
| HPE | $20.26 | -5.31% | 28.5B | -534.00 | -$0.04 | +2.49% |
Stock Comparison
AMPGW vs CSCO Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 312.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while CSCO trades at $77.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check CSCO's competition here
AMPGW vs MSI Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while MSI trades at $465.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 36.23. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MSI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check MSI's competition here
AMPGW vs LITE Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while LITE trades at $670.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is 195.25. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LITE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check LITE's competition here
AMPGW vs CIEN Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while CIEN trades at $336.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 389.63. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check CIEN's competition here
AMPGW vs UI Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while UI trades at $736.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 51.20. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to UI's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check UI's competition here
AMPGW vs NOK Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while NOK trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 59.73. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check NOK's competition here
AMPGW vs ERIC Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while ERIC trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check ERIC's competition here
AMPGW vs SATS Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while SATS trades at $108.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check SATS's competition here
AMPGW vs HPE Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while HPE trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is -534.00. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check HPE's competition here
AMPGW vs ASTS Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while ASTS trades at $84.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -70.35. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check ASTS's competition here
AMPGW vs CRDO Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while CRDO trades at $119.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 104.25. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check CRDO's competition here
AMPGW vs JNPR Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while JNPR trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check JNPR's competition here
AMPGW vs ZBRA Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while ZBRA trades at $238.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check ZBRA's competition here
AMPGW vs VIAV Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while VIAV trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is -144.89. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VIAV's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check VIAV's competition here
AMPGW vs VSAT Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while VSAT trades at $44.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check VSAT's competition here
AMPGW vs BDC Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while BDC trades at $144.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check BDC's competition here
AMPGW vs ONDS Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while ONDS trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -27.86. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ONDS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check ONDS's competition here
AMPGW vs VISN Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VISN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while VISN trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VISN's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VISN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to VISN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check VISN's competition here
AMPGW vs COMM Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while COMM trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to COMM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check COMM's competition here
AMPGW vs MAXR Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check MAXR's competition here
AMPGW vs PI Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while PI trades at $119.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -345.73. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check PI's competition here
AMPGW vs KN Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while KN trades at $27.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 47.48. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check KN's competition here
AMPGW vs DGII Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while DGII trades at $47.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 44.82. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check DGII's competition here
AMPGW vs EXTR Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while EXTR trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is 234.17. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to EXTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check EXTR's competition here
AMPGW vs INFN Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to INFN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check INFN's competition here
AMPGW vs HLIT Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while HLIT trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HLIT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check HLIT's competition here
AMPGW vs SWIR Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check SWIR's competition here
AMPGW vs ITRN Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 970M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while ITRN trades at $47.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check ITRN's competition here
AMPGW vs GILT Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 878.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while GILT trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check GILT's competition here
AMPGW vs ADTN Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 806.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while ADTN trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check ADTN's competition here
AMPGW vs POLY Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check POLY's competition here
AMPGW vs NTGR Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 592.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while NTGR trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is -33.13. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NTGR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check NTGR's competition here
AMPGW vs AIOT Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 508.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while AIOT trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -16.48. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check AIOT's competition here
AMPGW vs PWFL Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check PWFL's competition here
AMPGW vs FEIM Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 474.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while FEIM trades at $45.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check FEIM's competition here
AMPGW vs CLFD Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 450.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while CLFD trades at $31.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is 72.27. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check CLFD's competition here
AMPGW vs TSAT Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 442.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while TSAT trades at $29.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check TSAT's competition here
AMPGW vs BKTI Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 320.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while BKTI trades at $85.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check BKTI's competition here
AMPGW vs AVNW Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 318.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while AVNW trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AVNW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check AVNW's competition here
AMPGW vs ITI Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check ITI's competition here
AMPGW vs SATX Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while SATX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check SATX's competition here
AMPGW vs LTRX Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 237.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while LTRX trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check LTRX's competition here
AMPGW vs AUDC Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 207.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while AUDC trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check AUDC's competition here
AMPGW vs CRNT Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 206.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while CRNT trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 115.00. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check CRNT's competition here
AMPGW vs INSG Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while INSG trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to INSG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check INSG's competition here
AMPGW vs CMTL Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 165.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while CMTL trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check CMTL's competition here
AMPGW vs PCTI Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check PCTI's competition here
AMPGW vs KVHI Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 117.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while KVHI trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check KVHI's competition here
AMPGW vs SILC Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 115M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while SILC trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check SILC's competition here
AMPGW vs TESS Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check TESS's competition here
AMPGW vs JCS Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to JCS's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check JCS's competition here
AMPGW vs AIRG Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while AIRG trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check AIRG's competition here
AMPGW vs MOB Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while MOB trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MOB's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check MOB's competition here
AMPGW vs AMPG Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while AMPG trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check AMPG's competition here
AMPGW vs OCC Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while OCC trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -32.61. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check OCC's competition here
AMPGW vs FKWL Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 46.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while FKWL trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -395.00. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FKWL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check FKWL's competition here
AMPGW vs WTT Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check WTT's competition here
AMPGW vs SYTA Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while SYTA trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check SYTA's competition here
AMPGW vs CMBM Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while CMBM trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CMBM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check CMBM's competition here
AMPGW vs BOSC Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while BOSC trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check BOSC's competition here
AMPGW vs FIEE Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, FIEE has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while FIEE trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIEE's P/E ratio is -59.17. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FIEE's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to FIEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check FIEE's competition here
AMPGW vs MOBBW Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while MOBBW trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check MOBBW's competition here
AMPGW vs UTSI Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while UTSI trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check UTSI's competition here
AMPGW vs MINM Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while MINM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MINM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check MINM's competition here
AMPGW vs CLRO Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while CLRO trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check CLRO's competition here
AMPGW vs SYNX Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while SYNX trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check SYNX's competition here
AMPGW vs MITQ Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while MITQ trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -20.68. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check MITQ's competition here
AMPGW vs IOTR Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while IOTR trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check IOTR's competition here
AMPGW vs SONM Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while SONM trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SONM's ROE of +15.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check SONM's competition here
AMPGW vs VISL Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while VISL trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VISL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check VISL's competition here
AMPGW vs CASA Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check CASA's competition here
AMPGW vs MYNA Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check MYNA's competition here
AMPGW vs DZSI Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while DZSI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check DZSI's competition here
AMPGW vs ASNS Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 184K. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while ASNS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check ASNS's competition here
AMPGW vs SYTAW Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 55.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while SYTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check SYTAW's competition here
AMPGW vs GIMO Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, GIMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while GIMO trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GIMO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to GIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check GIMO's competition here
AMPGW vs ZXZZT Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while ZXZZT trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check ZXZZT's competition here
AMPGW vs BDR Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check BDR's competition here
AMPGW vs EXFO Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check EXFO's competition here
AMPGW vs RKUS Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, RKUS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while RKUS trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKUS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to RKUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to RKUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check RKUS's competition here
AMPGW vs SATX-WTA Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check SATX-WTA's competition here
AMPGW vs VCRA Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check VCRA's competition here
AMPGW vs ORBC Comparison February 2026
AMPGW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMPGW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMPGW is priced at $0.08, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMPGW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMPGW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMPGW is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMPGW.Check ORBC's competition here