ADT Inc.
ADT Inc. ADT Peers
See (ADT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADT | $8.43 | +0.36% | 6.6B | 12.95 | $0.65 | +2.62% |
| ALLE | $143.89 | +0.35% | 12.4B | 20.18 | $7.13 | +1.38% |
| MSA | $167.33 | -1.08% | 6.6B | 23.08 | $7.25 | +1.24% |
| BCO | $89.10 | -0.93% | 3.7B | 24.03 | $3.71 | +1.10% |
| GEO | $23.78 | +1.58% | 3.4B | 108.05 | $0.22 | N/A |
| REZI | $22.46 | +0.67% | 3.3B | 74.87 | $0.30 | N/A |
| BRC | $68.91 | +0.31% | 3.3B | 17.01 | $4.05 | +1.40% |
| VVNT | $12.00 | +0.00% | 2.6B | -50.00 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| ARLO | $17.17 | -1.09% | 1.8B | -78.00 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| NSSC | $29.63 | -0.64% | 1.1B | 24.29 | $1.22 | +1.75% |
Stock Comparison
ADT vs ALLE Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ALLE has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while ALLE trades at $143.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas ALLE's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALLE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to ALLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs MSA Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MSA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while MSA trades at $167.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas MSA's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to MSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs BCO Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BCO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while BCO trades at $89.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas BCO's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCO's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to BCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs GEO Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GEO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while GEO trades at $23.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas GEO's P/E ratio is 108.05. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to GEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs REZI Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while REZI trades at $22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is 74.87. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to REZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs BRC Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BRC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while BRC trades at $68.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas BRC's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to BRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs VVNT Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VVNT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while VVNT trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas VVNT's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to VVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs ARLO Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while ARLO trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is -78.00. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARLO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs NSSC Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NSSC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while NSSC trades at $29.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas NSSC's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NSSC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to NSSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs EVLV Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EVLV has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while EVLV trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas EVLV's P/E ratio is -22.25. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVLV's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to EVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs CIX Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CIX has a market cap of 323.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while CIX trades at $27.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas CIX's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to CIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs NL Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NL has a market cap of 311.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while NL trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas NL's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to NL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs MG Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MG has a market cap of 246.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while MG trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas MG's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to MG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs SNT Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SNT has a market cap of 102.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while SNT trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas SNT's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to SNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs BAER Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BAER has a market cap of 84.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while BAER trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas BAER's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAER's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to BAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs EVLVW Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while EVLVW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs NXTD Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NXTD has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while NXTD trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas NXTD's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NXTD's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to NXTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs SPCB Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SPCB has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while SPCB trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas SPCB's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPCB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to SPCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs KSCP Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KSCP has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while KSCP trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas KSCP's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KSCP's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to KSCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs GFAIW Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GFAIW has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while GFAIW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas GFAIW's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GFAIW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to GFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs GFAI Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GFAI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while GFAI trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas GFAI's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GFAI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to GFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs CIGL Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CIGL has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while CIGL trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas CIGL's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIGL's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to CIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs VRME Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VRME has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while VRME trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas VRME's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VRME's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to VRME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs SUGP Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SUGP has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while SUGP trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas SUGP's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUGP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to SUGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs IVDAW Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IVDAW has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while IVDAW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas IVDAW's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IVDAW's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to IVDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs UUU Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, UUU has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while UUU trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas UUU's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UUU's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to UUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs VRMEW Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VRMEW has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while VRMEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas VRMEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VRMEW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to VRMEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs IVDA Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IVDA has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while IVDA trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas IVDA's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IVDA's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to IVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs BKYI Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BKYI has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while BKYI trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas BKYI's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BKYI's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to BKYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs DGLY Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DGLY has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while DGLY trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas DGLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DGLY's ROE of -9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to DGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs BAERW Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BAERW has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while BAERW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas BAERW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAERW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to BAERW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs LGMK Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LGMK has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while LGMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.95, whereas LGMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LGMK's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to LGMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.