ADT Inc.
ADT Inc. ADT Peers
See (ADT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADT | $8.43 | +2.12% | 6.6B | 12.96 | $0.65 | +2.62% |
| ALLE | $139.17 | +0.68% | 12B | 19.68 | $7.07 | +1.40% |
| MSA | $165.07 | -0.11% | 6.5B | 22.77 | $7.25 | +1.24% |
| GEO | $26.96 | +2.90% | 3.8B | 122.55 | $0.22 | N/A |
| BCO | $83.92 | +0.65% | 3.5B | 22.62 | $3.71 | +1.17% |
| BRC | $69.99 | +0.63% | 3.3B | 17.28 | $4.05 | +1.37% |
| REZI | $21.15 | +1.15% | 3.1B | 70.50 | $0.30 | N/A |
| VVNT | $12.00 | N/A | 2.6B | -50.00 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| ARLO | $16.78 | +3.52% | 1.7B | -76.27 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| NSSC | $28.84 | +0.56% | 1B | 23.64 | $1.22 | +1.30% |
Stock Comparison
ADT vs ALLE Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ALLE has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while ALLE trades at $139.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas ALLE's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALLE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to ALLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs MSA Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MSA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while MSA trades at $165.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas MSA's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to MSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs GEO Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GEO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while GEO trades at $26.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas GEO's P/E ratio is 122.55. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to GEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs BCO Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BCO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while BCO trades at $83.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas BCO's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCO's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to BCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs BRC Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BRC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while BRC trades at $69.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas BRC's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to BRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs REZI Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while REZI trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is 70.50. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to REZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs VVNT Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VVNT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while VVNT trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas VVNT's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to VVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs ARLO Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while ARLO trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is -76.27. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARLO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs NSSC Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NSSC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while NSSC trades at $28.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas NSSC's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NSSC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to NSSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs EVLV Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EVLV has a market cap of 905.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while EVLV trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas EVLV's P/E ratio is -19.71. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVLV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to EVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs NL Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NL has a market cap of 340M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while NL trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas NL's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to NL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs CIX Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CIX has a market cap of 304.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while CIX trades at $24.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CIX's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to CIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs MG Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MG has a market cap of 239.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while MG trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas MG's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to MG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs BAER Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BAER has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while BAER trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas BAER's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAER's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to BAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs SNT Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SNT has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while SNT trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas SNT's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to SNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs EVLVW Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while EVLVW trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs NXTD Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NXTD has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while NXTD trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas NXTD's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NXTD's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to NXTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs SPCB Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SPCB has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while SPCB trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas SPCB's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPCB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to SPCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs KSCP Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KSCP has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while KSCP trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas KSCP's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KSCP's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to KSCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs GFAI Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GFAI has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while GFAI trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas GFAI's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GFAI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to GFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs GFAIW Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GFAIW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while GFAIW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas GFAIW's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GFAIW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to GFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs VRMEW Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VRMEW has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while VRMEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas VRMEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VRMEW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to VRMEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs SUGP Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SUGP has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while SUGP trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas SUGP's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUGP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to SUGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs VRME Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VRME has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while VRME trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas VRME's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VRME's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to VRME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs CIGL Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CIGL has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while CIGL trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CIGL's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIGL's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to CIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs IVDAW Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IVDAW has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while IVDAW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas IVDAW's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IVDAW's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to IVDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs UUU Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, UUU has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while UUU trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas UUU's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UUU's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to UUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs IVDA Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IVDA has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while IVDA trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas IVDA's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IVDA's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to IVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs BKYI Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BKYI has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while BKYI trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas BKYI's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BKYI's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to BKYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs BAERW Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BAERW has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while BAERW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas BAERW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAERW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to BAERW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs DGLY Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DGLY has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while DGLY trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas DGLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DGLY's ROE of -9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to DGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.
ADT vs LGMK Comparison
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LGMK has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.43, while LGMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas LGMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LGMK's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to LGMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.