ADT Inc.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, ASAZY has a market cap of 34.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while ASAZY trades at $15.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas ASAZY's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASAZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to ASAZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, ASAZF has a market cap of 32.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while ASAZF trades at $29.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas ASAZF's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASAZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to ASAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, SOMLY has a market cap of 15.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while SOMLY trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas SOMLY's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOMLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to SOMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, SOMLF has a market cap of 14.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while SOMLF trades at $33.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas SOMLF's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOMLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to SOMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, ALLE has a market cap of 12.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while ALLE trades at $140.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas ALLE's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALLE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to ALLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, SCTBY has a market cap of 8.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while SCTBY trades at $16.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas SCTBY's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCTBY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to SCTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, SCTBF has a market cap of 8.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while SCTBF trades at $15.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas SCTBF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCTBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to SCTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, MSA has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while MSA trades at $155.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas MSA's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to MSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, GEO has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while GEO trades at $31.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas GEO's P/E ratio is 142.50. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to GEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, BCO has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while BCO trades at $91.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas BCO's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to BCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, BRC has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while BRC trades at $71.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas BRC's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to BRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, LOIMF has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while LOIMF trades at $39.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas LOIMF's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOIMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to LOIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while REZI trades at $17.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REZI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to REZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, VVNT has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while VVNT trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas VVNT's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to VVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, SOHGF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while SOHGF trades at $5.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas SOHGF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOHGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to SOHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while ARLO trades at $10.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is -33.05. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARLO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, NSSC has a market cap of 897.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while NSSC trades at $24.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas NSSC's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NSSC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to NSSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, EVLV has a market cap of 671.86M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while EVLV trades at $4.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas EVLV's P/E ratio is -37.36. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVLV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to EVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, NL has a market cap of 420.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while NL trades at $8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas NL's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to NL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, MRLWF has a market cap of 367.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while MRLWF trades at $4.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas MRLWF's P/E ratio is -156.17. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRLWF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to MRLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, CIX has a market cap of 327.98M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while CIX trades at $26.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas CIX's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to CIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, MG has a market cap of 296.31M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while MG trades at $9.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas MG's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to MG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, CRFQF has a market cap of 223.79M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while CRFQF trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas CRFQF's P/E ratio is 233.00. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRFQF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to CRFQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, ICTSF has a market cap of 132.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while ICTSF trades at $3.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas ICTSF's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ICTSF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to ICTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, SNT has a market cap of 79.78M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while SNT trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas SNT's P/E ratio is 31.09. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to SNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, BAER has a market cap of 78.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while BAER trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas BAER's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAER's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to BAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, RSKIA has a market cap of 75.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while RSKIA trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas RSKIA's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RSKIA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to RSKIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, WPNNF has a market cap of 66.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while WPNNF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas WPNNF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WPNNF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to WPNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, NXTD has a market cap of 57.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while NXTD trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas NXTD's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NXTD's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to NXTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 41.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while EVLVW trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, SECUF has a market cap of 32.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while SECUF trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas SECUF's P/E ratio is 176.00. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SECUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to SECUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, KSCP has a market cap of 31.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while KSCP trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas KSCP's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KSCP's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to KSCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, GKPRF has a market cap of 29.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while GKPRF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas GKPRF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GKPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to GKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, PRBCF has a market cap of 27.86M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while PRBCF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas PRBCF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRBCF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to PRBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, ALXXF has a market cap of 27.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while ALXXF trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas ALXXF's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALXXF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to ALXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, GFAI has a market cap of 19.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while GFAI trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas GFAI's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GFAI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to GFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, SPCB has a market cap of 19.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while SPCB trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas SPCB's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPCB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to SPCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, GFAIW has a market cap of 18.67M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while GFAIW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas GFAIW's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GFAIW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to GFAIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, LDDFF has a market cap of 14.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while LDDFF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas LDDFF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LDDFF's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to LDDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, CSTI has a market cap of 9.74M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while CSTI trades at $4.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas CSTI's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSTI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to CSTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, VRMEW has a market cap of 9.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while VRMEW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas VRMEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VRMEW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to VRMEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, VRME has a market cap of 9.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while VRME trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas VRME's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VRME's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to VRME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, SUGP has a market cap of 8.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while SUGP trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas SUGP's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUGP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to SUGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, VOTDF has a market cap of 6.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while VOTDF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas VOTDF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VOTDF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to VOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, IVDAW has a market cap of 6.31M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while IVDAW trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas IVDAW's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IVDAW's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to IVDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, IVDA has a market cap of 6.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while IVDA trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas IVDA's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IVDA's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to IVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, CIGL has a market cap of 5.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while CIGL trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas CIGL's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to CIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, BKYI has a market cap of 5.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while BKYI trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas BKYI's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BKYI's ROE of -5.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to BKYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, UUU has a market cap of 4.79M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while UUU trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas UUU's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UUU's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to UUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, DIGTF has a market cap of 3.47M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while DIGTF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas DIGTF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DIGTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to DIGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, BAERW has a market cap of 3.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while BAERW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas BAERW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAERW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to BAERW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, DADTF has a market cap of 3.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while DADTF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas DADTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DADTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to DADTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, DGLY has a market cap of 2.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while DGLY trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas DGLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DGLY's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to DGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, IWAL has a market cap of 2.45M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while IWAL trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas IWAL's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IWAL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to IWAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, PLRTF has a market cap of 2.27M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while PLRTF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas PLRTF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLRTF's ROE of +5.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to PLRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, LGMK has a market cap of 1.08M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while LGMK trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas LGMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LGMK's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to LGMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, SSECF has a market cap of 1.08M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while SSECF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas SSECF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SSECF's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to SSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, MACE has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while MACE trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas MACE's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MACE's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to MACE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, VCON has a market cap of 570440.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while VCON trades at $65.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas VCON's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VCON's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to VCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, ATWT has a market cap of 548894.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while ATWT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas ATWT's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATWT's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to ATWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, DTII has a market cap of 546366.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while DTII trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas DTII's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DTII's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to DTII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, DRNG has a market cap of 391764.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while DRNG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas DRNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DRNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to DRNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, LGTT has a market cap of 384210.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while LGTT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas LGTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LGTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to LGTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, WCCP has a market cap of 351525.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while WCCP trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas WCCP's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WCCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to WCCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, BLPG has a market cap of 339906.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while BLPG trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas BLPG's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLPG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to BLPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, VSYS has a market cap of 171810.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while VSYS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas VSYS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VSYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to VSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, PSGI has a market cap of 138029.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while PSGI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas PSGI's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSGI's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to PSGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, PTEFF has a market cap of 117688.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while PTEFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas PTEFF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTEFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to PTEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, SCTY has a market cap of 112500.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while SCTY trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas SCTY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCTY's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to SCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, MGNT has a market cap of 100000.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while MGNT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas MGNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MGNT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to MGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, GDSI has a market cap of 95353.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while GDSI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas GDSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GDSI's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to GDSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, HCGS has a market cap of 77203.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while HCGS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas HCGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HCGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to HCGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, MIHL has a market cap of 75588.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while MIHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas MIHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIHL's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to MIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, SKVY has a market cap of 60372.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while SKVY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas SKVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKVY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to SKVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, ABPR has a market cap of 49298.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while ABPR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas ABPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to ABPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, WOAM has a market cap of 32814.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while WOAM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas WOAM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WOAM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to WOAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, PERL has a market cap of 28340.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while PERL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas PERL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PERL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to PERL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, EKCS has a market cap of 21258.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while EKCS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas EKCS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EKCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to EKCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, EBWK has a market cap of 13659.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while EBWK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas EBWK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EBWK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to EBWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, HWSY has a market cap of 9087.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while HWSY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas HWSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HWSY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to HWSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, CVAS has a market cap of 7498.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while CVAS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas CVAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CVAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to CVAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, ARGL has a market cap of 741.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while ARGL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas ARGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to ARGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, DIRV has a market cap of 224.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while DIRV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas DIRV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DIRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to DIRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, PWLK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while PWLK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas PWLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PWLK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to PWLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, GTKP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while GTKP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas GTKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTKP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to GTKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, HLCN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while HLCN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas HLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to HLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.

ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 6.35B. In comparison, VSYM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $8.12, while VSYM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.49, whereas VSYM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VSYM's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to VSYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.