Molekule Group, Inc. (MKUL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MKUL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKUL | $0.05 | -39.89% | 1.9M | -0.08 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| VLTO | $93.82 | +2.09% | 22.3B | 22.57 | $4.03 | +0.55% |
| ZWS | $48.27 | +1.59% | 8B | 29.39 | $1.62 | +0.88% |
| FSS | $119.68 | +1.14% | 7.2B | 25.31 | $4.65 | +0.49% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $52.36 | +0.56% | 4.2B | 18.46 | $2.79 | +0.43% |
| CECO | $79.33 | -4.25% | 2.9B | 69.40 | $1.16 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $10.75 | -2.27% | 1.5B | -8.48 | -$1.30 | N/A |
| PCT | $6.43 | -4.96% | 1.4B | -4.96 | -$1.42 | N/A |
| PCTTW | $2.00 | +1.01% | 1.4B | -1.53 | -$1.31 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MKUL vs VLTO Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while VLTO trades at $93.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check VLTO's competition here
MKUL vs ZWS Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ZWS trades at $48.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check ZWS's competition here
MKUL vs FSS Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while FSS trades at $119.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check FSS's competition here
MKUL vs AQUA Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check AQUA's competition here
MKUL vs ATMU Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ATMU trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check ATMU's competition here
MKUL vs CECO Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while CECO trades at $79.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 69.40. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check CECO's competition here
MKUL vs PCTTU Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while PCTTU trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -8.48. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check PCTTU's competition here
MKUL vs PCT Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while PCT trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PCT's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check PCT's competition here
MKUL vs PCTTW Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while PCTTW trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check PCTTW's competition here
MKUL vs ADUR Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 457.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ADUR trades at $13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -31.72. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check ADUR's competition here
MKUL vs ERII Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 444.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ERII trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check ERII's competition here
MKUL vs CECE Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check CECE's competition here
MKUL vs ZONE Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 147.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ZONE trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check ZONE's competition here
MKUL vs ADES Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check ADES's competition here
MKUL vs ARQ Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ARQ trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -18.33. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check ARQ's competition here
MKUL vs FTEK Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while FTEK trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -17.44. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check FTEK's competition here
MKUL vs BCHT Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BCHT has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while BCHT trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BCHT's P/E ratio is -42.75. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to BCHT's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to BCHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check BCHT's competition here
MKUL vs BHTG Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check BHTG's competition here
MKUL vs CLIR Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while CLIR trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -8.45. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check CLIR's competition here
MKUL vs TOMZ Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while TOMZ trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check TOMZ's competition here
MKUL vs RAINW Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while RAINW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check RAINW's competition here
MKUL vs CLWT Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while CLWT trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check CLWT's competition here
MKUL vs LIQT Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while LIQT trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check LIQT's competition here
MKUL vs DEVS Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 749.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while DEVS trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check DEVS's competition here
MKUL vs SPECW Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check SPECW's competition here
MKUL vs NEWA Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check NEWA's competition here
MKUL vs AERC Comparison July 2026
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check AERC's competition here