Federal Signal Corporation
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FSS
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FSS
Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSS | $117.92 | +2.50% | 7.2B | 29.44 | $4.01 | +0.48% |
| VLTO | $90.85 | +1.51% | 22.5B | 24.16 | $3.76 | +0.53% |
| ZWS | $49.61 | +3.92% | 8.3B | 44.29 | $1.12 | +0.81% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $63.43 | +0.36% | 5.2B | 25.37 | $2.50 | +0.34% |
| CECO | $66.86 | +4.08% | 2.4B | 48.80 | $1.37 | N/A |
| PCT | $6.20 | +4.38% | 1.1B | -5.12 | -$1.21 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $6.20 | +0.00% | 851.2M | -9.95 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ERII | $11.41 | +2.70% | 604.4M | 27.17 | $0.42 | N/A |
| CECE | $11.65 | +2.19% | 401M | 58.25 | $0.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FSS vs VLTO Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while VLTO trades at $90.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check VLTO's competition here
FSS vs ZWS Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while ZWS trades at $49.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 44.29. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check ZWS's competition here
FSS vs AQUA Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is more volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check AQUA's competition here
FSS vs ATMU Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while ATMU trades at $63.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check ATMU's competition here
FSS vs CECO Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while CECO trades at $66.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 48.80. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check CECO's competition here
FSS vs PCT Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while PCT trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCT's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check PCT's competition here
FSS vs PCTTU Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 851.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while PCTTU trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -9.95. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check PCTTU's competition here
FSS vs ERII Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 604.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while ERII trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check ERII's competition here
FSS vs CECE Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check CECE's competition here
FSS vs PCTTW Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 169.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while PCTTW trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check PCTTW's competition here
FSS vs ADES Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check ADES's competition here
FSS vs ARQ Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while ARQ trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is more volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check ARQ's competition here
FSS vs ZONE Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 70.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while ZONE trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -16.82. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check ZONE's competition here
FSS vs SCWO Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while SCWO trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check SCWO's competition here
FSS vs BCHT Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BCHT has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while BCHT trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas BCHT's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCHT's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to BCHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check BCHT's competition here
FSS vs FTEK Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while FTEK trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check FTEK's competition here
FSS vs BHTG Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check BHTG's competition here
FSS vs CLIR Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while CLIR trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check CLIR's competition here
FSS vs LIQT Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while LIQT trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is more volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check LIQT's competition here
FSS vs TOMZ Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while TOMZ trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check TOMZ's competition here
FSS vs CLWT Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while CLWT trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is more volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check CLWT's competition here
FSS vs DEVS Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while DEVS trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check DEVS's competition here
FSS vs MKUL Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check MKUL's competition here
FSS vs RAINW Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while RAINW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check RAINW's competition here
FSS vs SPECW Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check SPECW's competition here
FSS vs SPEC Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check SPEC's competition here
FSS vs NEWA Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check NEWA's competition here
FSS vs AERC Comparison April 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.92, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.44, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check AERC's competition here