Evoqua Water Technologies Corp. (AQUA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AQUA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| VLTO | $84.02 | +1.51% | 20.6B | 21.65 | $3.88 | +0.57% |
| ZWS | $49.98 | +3.33% | 8.4B | 40.63 | $1.23 | +0.84% |
| FSS | $118.52 | +4.12% | 7.2B | 26.94 | $4.40 | +0.49% |
| ATMU | $51.79 | +1.81% | 4.2B | 20.31 | $2.55 | +0.42% |
| CECO | $98.40 | +4.17% | 3.5B | 258.95 | $0.38 | N/A |
| PCT | $8.70 | +0.93% | 1.7B | -5.92 | -$1.47 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $9.78 | -9.78% | 1.3B | -15.70 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ADUR | $15.12 | +2.72% | 511.6M | -36.00 | -$0.42 | N/A |
| ERII | $9.42 | +4.78% | 485.6M | 25.46 | $0.37 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AQUA vs VLTO Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while VLTO trades at $84.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check VLTO's competition here
AQUA vs ZWS Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ZWS trades at $49.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 40.63. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check ZWS's competition here
AQUA vs FSS Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while FSS trades at $118.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check FSS's competition here
AQUA vs ATMU Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ATMU trades at $51.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check ATMU's competition here
AQUA vs CECO Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while CECO trades at $98.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 258.95. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check CECO's competition here
AQUA vs PCT Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while PCT trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCT's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check PCT's competition here
AQUA vs PCTTU Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while PCTTU trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -15.70. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check PCTTU's competition here
AQUA vs ADUR Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 511.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ADUR trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check ADUR's competition here
AQUA vs ERII Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 485.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ERII trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check ERII's competition here
AQUA vs CECE Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check CECE's competition here
AQUA vs PCTTW Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 361.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while PCTTW trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check PCTTW's competition here
AQUA vs ZONE Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 218.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ZONE trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -19.69. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check ZONE's competition here
AQUA vs ARQ Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 121.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ARQ trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check ARQ's competition here
AQUA vs ADES Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check ADES's competition here
AQUA vs BCHT Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BCHT has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while BCHT trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas BCHT's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCHT's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to BCHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check BCHT's competition here
AQUA vs FTEK Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while FTEK trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check FTEK's competition here
AQUA vs SCWO Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while SCWO trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check SCWO's competition here
AQUA vs BHTG Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check BHTG's competition here
AQUA vs CLIR Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while CLIR trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -34.45. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check CLIR's competition here
AQUA vs RAINW Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while RAINW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check RAINW's competition here
AQUA vs TOMZ Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while TOMZ trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check TOMZ's competition here
AQUA vs CLWT Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while CLWT trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 95.50. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check CLWT's competition here
AQUA vs LIQT Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while LIQT trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check LIQT's competition here
AQUA vs MKUL Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check MKUL's competition here
AQUA vs DEVS Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while DEVS trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check DEVS's competition here
AQUA vs SPECW Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check SPECW's competition here
AQUA vs AERC Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check AERC's competition here
AQUA vs NEWA Comparison June 2026
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.Check NEWA's competition here