ClearSign Technologies Corporation
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CLIR
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CLIR
ClearSign Technologies Corporation (CLIR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLIR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLIR | $5.33 | -8.73% | 28.2M | -5.27 | -$0.99 | N/A |
| VLTO | $90.54 | -1.93% | 22.4B | 24.08 | $3.76 | +0.53% |
| ZWS | $46.51 | -1.86% | 7.8B | 41.51 | $1.12 | +0.86% |
| FSS | $110.41 | -2.42% | 6.7B | 27.55 | $4.01 | +0.51% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $61.06 | -1.82% | 5B | 24.42 | $2.50 | +0.35% |
| CECO | $63.99 | -1.08% | 2.3B | 46.71 | $1.37 | N/A |
| PCT | $6.82 | +1.94% | 1.2B | -5.64 | -$1.21 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $6.15 | -0.81% | 844.4M | -9.87 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ERII | $10.45 | -1.60% | 553.6M | 24.88 | $0.42 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CLIR vs VLTO Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while VLTO trades at $90.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check VLTO's competition here
CLIR vs ZWS Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while ZWS trades at $46.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 41.51. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check ZWS's competition here
CLIR vs FSS Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while FSS trades at $110.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check FSS's competition here
CLIR vs AQUA Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check AQUA's competition here
CLIR vs ATMU Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while ATMU trades at $61.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check ATMU's competition here
CLIR vs CECO Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while CECO trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 46.71. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check CECO's competition here
CLIR vs PCT Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while PCT trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PCT's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check PCT's competition here
CLIR vs PCTTU Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 844.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while PCTTU trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check PCTTU's competition here
CLIR vs ERII Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 553.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while ERII trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check ERII's competition here
CLIR vs CECE Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check CECE's competition here
CLIR vs PCTTW Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 200.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while PCTTW trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check PCTTW's competition here
CLIR vs ADES Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check ADES's competition here
CLIR vs ARQ Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while ARQ trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check ARQ's competition here
CLIR vs ZONE Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while ZONE trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -15.99. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check ZONE's competition here
CLIR vs SCWO Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while SCWO trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check SCWO's competition here
CLIR vs BCHT Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, BCHT has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while BCHT trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas BCHT's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BCHT's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to BCHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check BCHT's competition here
CLIR vs FTEK Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while FTEK trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -16.87. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check FTEK's competition here
CLIR vs BHTG Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check BHTG's competition here
CLIR vs LIQT Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while LIQT trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check LIQT's competition here
CLIR vs TOMZ Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while TOMZ trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check TOMZ's competition here
CLIR vs CLWT Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while CLWT trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check CLWT's competition here
CLIR vs DEVS Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while DEVS trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check DEVS's competition here
CLIR vs MKUL Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check MKUL's competition here
CLIR vs RAINW Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while RAINW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check RAINW's competition here
CLIR vs SPECW Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check SPECW's competition here
CLIR vs SPEC Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is less volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check SPEC's competition here
CLIR vs NEWA Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check NEWA's competition here
CLIR vs AERC Comparison April 2026
CLIR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 28.2M. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $5.33, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.27, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.54%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check AERC's competition here