ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while VLTO trades at $97.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check VLTO's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while FSS trades at $130.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to FSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check FSS's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while AQUA trades at $49.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check AQUA's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while CECO trades at $69.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 59.59. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to CECO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check CECO's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while PCTTU trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -8.48. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check PCTTU's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while PCTTW trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check PCTTW's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while PCT trades at $6.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to PCT's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to PCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check PCT's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 523.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while ADUR trades at $15.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -36.35. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check ADUR's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 456.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while ERII trades at $8.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to ERII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check ERII's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while CECE trades at $11.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to CECE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check CECE's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while ADES trades at $3.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check ADES's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 88M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while ARQ trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -17.08. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check ARQ's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 67.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while ZONE trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check ZONE's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while FTEK trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -16.11. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check FTEK's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, BCHT has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while BCHT trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas BCHT's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BCHT's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to BCHT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check BCHT's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while BHTG trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check BHTG's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while TOMZ trades at $1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check TOMZ's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while CLWT trades at $1.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check CLWT's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while RAINW trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check RAINW's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while LIQT trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is less volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check LIQT's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while MKUL trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check MKUL's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 749.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while DEVS trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check DEVS's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while SPECW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check SPECW's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while NEWA trades at $4.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check NEWA's competition here

ClearSign Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CLIR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLIR stands at 24.5M. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLIR is priced at $3.89 on the NASDAQ, while AERC trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLIR currently has a P/E ratio of -8.84, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIR's ROE is -0.61%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIR is more volatile compared to AERC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIR.Check AERC's competition here