Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLWT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLWT | $1.67 | -1.76% | 12.4M | 13.19 | $0.13 | N/A |
| VLTO | $92.70 | +0.65% | 22.8B | 23.00 | $4.03 | +0.54% |
| ZWS | $47.35 | +1.24% | 7.9B | 29.22 | $1.62 | +0.88% |
| FSS | $115.23 | -1.42% | 7B | 24.78 | $4.65 | +0.50% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $50.67 | +1.28% | 4.1B | 18.15 | $2.79 | +0.43% |
| CECO | $83.63 | -0.82% | 3B | 72.09 | $1.16 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $11.00 | +0.00% | 1.5B | -8.48 | -$1.30 | N/A |
| PCT | $7.30 | -2.14% | 1.5B | -5.14 | -$1.42 | N/A |
| PCTTW | $2.70 | +11.11% | 1.4B | -1.92 | -$1.31 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CLWT vs VLTO Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while VLTO trades at $92.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check VLTO's competition here
CLWT vs ZWS Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while ZWS trades at $47.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check ZWS's competition here
CLWT vs FSS Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while FSS trades at $115.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check FSS's competition here
CLWT vs AQUA Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check AQUA's competition here
CLWT vs ATMU Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while ATMU trades at $50.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check ATMU's competition here
CLWT vs CECO Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while CECO trades at $83.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 72.09. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check CECO's competition here
CLWT vs PCTTU Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while PCTTU trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -8.48. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check PCTTU's competition here
CLWT vs PCT Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while PCT trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PCT's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check PCT's competition here
CLWT vs PCTTW Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while PCTTW trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check PCTTW's competition here
CLWT vs ADUR Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 545.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while ADUR trades at $16.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -36.64. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check ADUR's competition here
CLWT vs ERII Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 450M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while ERII trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check ERII's competition here
CLWT vs CECE Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check CECE's competition here
CLWT vs ZONE Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while ZONE trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check ZONE's competition here
CLWT vs ADES Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check ADES's competition here
CLWT vs ARQ Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while ARQ trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -19.33. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check ARQ's competition here
CLWT vs FTEK Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while FTEK trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -18.67. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check FTEK's competition here
CLWT vs BCHT Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BCHT has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while BCHT trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas BCHT's P/E ratio is -48.00. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BCHT's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to BCHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check BCHT's competition here
CLWT vs BHTG Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check BHTG's competition here
CLWT vs CLIR Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while CLIR trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check CLIR's competition here
CLWT vs TOMZ Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while TOMZ trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check TOMZ's competition here
CLWT vs RAINW Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while RAINW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check RAINW's competition here
CLWT vs LIQT Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while LIQT trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check LIQT's competition here
CLWT vs MKUL Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check MKUL's competition here
CLWT vs DEVS Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 749.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while DEVS trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check DEVS's competition here
CLWT vs SPECW Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check SPECW's competition here
CLWT vs NEWA Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check NEWA's competition here
CLWT vs AERC Comparison July 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 12.4M. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.67, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is more volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check AERC's competition here