Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CLWT
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLWT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLWT | $1.28 | +0.00% | 9.6M | 18.00 | $0.07 | N/A |
| VLTO | $92.32 | -0.08% | 22.9B | 24.56 | $3.76 | +0.52% |
| ZWS | $47.39 | -3.97% | 7.9B | 42.33 | $1.12 | +0.84% |
| FSS | $113.15 | -3.47% | 6.9B | 28.21 | $4.01 | +0.50% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $62.19 | -2.80% | 5.1B | 24.87 | $2.50 | +0.35% |
| CECO | $64.69 | -2.09% | 2.3B | 47.22 | $1.37 | N/A |
| PCT | $6.69 | -0.59% | 1.2B | -5.53 | -$1.21 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $6.15 | -0.81% | 844.4M | -9.87 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ERII | $10.62 | -5.93% | 562.6M | 25.29 | $0.42 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CLWT vs VLTO Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while VLTO trades at $92.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check VLTO's competition here
CLWT vs ZWS Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while ZWS trades at $47.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check ZWS's competition here
CLWT vs FSS Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while FSS trades at $113.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check FSS's competition here
CLWT vs AQUA Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check AQUA's competition here
CLWT vs ATMU Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while ATMU trades at $62.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check ATMU's competition here
CLWT vs CECO Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while CECO trades at $64.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 47.22. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check CECO's competition here
CLWT vs PCT Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while PCT trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCT's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check PCT's competition here
CLWT vs PCTTU Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 844.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while PCTTU trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT and PCTTU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCTTU's competition here
CLWT vs ERII Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 562.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while ERII trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check ERII's competition here
CLWT vs CECE Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check CECE's competition here
CLWT vs PCTTW Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 200.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while PCTTW trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check PCTTW's competition here
CLWT vs ADES Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check ADES's competition here
CLWT vs ARQ Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 101.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while ARQ trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check ARQ's competition here
CLWT vs ZONE Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while ZONE trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -16.37. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check ZONE's competition here
CLWT vs SCWO Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while SCWO trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check SCWO's competition here
CLWT vs BCHT Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, BCHT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while BCHT trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas BCHT's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCHT's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to BCHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check BCHT's competition here
CLWT vs FTEK Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while FTEK trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check FTEK's competition here
CLWT vs CLIR Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while CLIR trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check CLIR's competition here
CLWT vs BHTG Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check BHTG's competition here
CLWT vs LIQT Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while LIQT trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check LIQT's competition here
CLWT vs TOMZ Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while TOMZ trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check TOMZ's competition here
CLWT vs DEVS Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while DEVS trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check DEVS's competition here
CLWT vs MKUL Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check MKUL's competition here
CLWT vs RAINW Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while RAINW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT and RAINW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RAINW's competition here
CLWT vs SPECW Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check SPECW's competition here
CLWT vs SPEC Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT and SPEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPEC's competition here
CLWT vs NEWA Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check NEWA's competition here
CLWT vs AERC Comparison April 2026
CLWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLWT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLWT is priced at $1.28, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLWT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLWT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLWT is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLWT.Check AERC's competition here