LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LIQT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIQT | $0.91 | +0.59% | 9M | -0.98 | -$0.92 | N/A |
| VLTO | $82.95 | -1.27% | 20.4B | 21.38 | $3.88 | +0.58% |
| ZWS | $49.64 | -0.68% | 8.3B | 40.38 | $1.23 | +0.84% |
| FSS | $117.44 | -0.91% | 7.2B | 26.68 | $4.40 | +0.49% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $52.12 | +0.64% | 4.3B | 20.44 | $2.55 | +0.42% |
| CECO | $99.67 | +1.29% | 3.6B | 262.29 | $0.38 | N/A |
| PCT | $8.34 | -4.14% | 1.7B | -5.67 | -$1.47 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $9.78 | +0.00% | 1.3B | -15.70 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ADUR | $14.67 | -2.98% | 496.4M | -34.93 | -$0.42 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LIQT vs VLTO Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while VLTO trades at $82.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check VLTO's competition here
LIQT vs ZWS Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while ZWS trades at $49.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 40.38. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ZWS's competition here
LIQT vs FSS Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while FSS trades at $117.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check FSS's competition here
LIQT vs AQUA Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check AQUA's competition here
LIQT vs ATMU Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while ATMU trades at $52.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ATMU's competition here
LIQT vs CECO Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while CECO trades at $99.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 262.29. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check CECO's competition here
LIQT vs PCT Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while PCT trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PCT's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check PCT's competition here
LIQT vs PCTTU Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while PCTTU trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -15.70. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check PCTTU's competition here
LIQT vs ADUR Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 496.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while ADUR trades at $14.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -34.93. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ADUR's competition here
LIQT vs ERII Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 458.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while ERII trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ERII's competition here
LIQT vs PCTTW Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 406.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while PCTTW trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check PCTTW's competition here
LIQT vs CECE Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check CECE's competition here
LIQT vs ZONE Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 220.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while ZONE trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -16.53. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ZONE's competition here
LIQT vs ADES Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ADES's competition here
LIQT vs ARQ Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 110.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while ARQ trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ARQ's competition here
LIQT vs FTEK Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while FTEK trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -19.90. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check FTEK's competition here
LIQT vs BCHT Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, BCHT has a market cap of 53.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while BCHT trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas BCHT's P/E ratio is -15.77. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BCHT's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to BCHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check BCHT's competition here
LIQT vs SCWO Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while SCWO trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check SCWO's competition here
LIQT vs BHTG Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check BHTG's competition here
LIQT vs CLIR Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while CLIR trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -33.82. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check CLIR's competition here
LIQT vs TOMZ Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while TOMZ trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check TOMZ's competition here
LIQT vs RAINW Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while RAINW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check RAINW's competition here
LIQT vs CLWT Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while CLWT trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 91.00. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check CLWT's competition here
LIQT vs MKUL Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check MKUL's competition here
LIQT vs DEVS Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while DEVS trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check DEVS's competition here
LIQT vs SPECW Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check SPECW's competition here
LIQT vs AERC Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check AERC's competition here
LIQT vs NEWA Comparison June 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 9M. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.91, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.79%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check NEWA's competition here