LiqTech International, Inc.
LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LIQT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIQT | $2.27 | -1.62% | 22.6M | -2.55 | -$0.89 | N/A |
| VLTO | $86.84 | -2.13% | 21.3B | 22.39 | $3.88 | +0.55% |
| ZWS | $51.19 | +0.27% | 8.6B | 41.61 | $1.23 | +0.78% |
| FSS | $118.33 | -1.77% | 7.2B | 26.87 | $4.40 | +0.48% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $55.59 | +1.37% | 4.5B | 21.79 | $2.55 | +0.39% |
| CECO | $81.78 | +0.49% | 2.9B | 204.45 | $0.40 | N/A |
| PCT | $9.53 | +6.60% | 1.7B | -6.48 | -$1.47 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $7.40 | +19.35% | 1B | -11.88 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ERII | $9.13 | -3.18% | 470.6M | 24.68 | $0.37 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LIQT vs VLTO Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while VLTO trades at $86.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check VLTO's competition here
LIQT vs ZWS Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while ZWS trades at $51.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 41.61. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ZWS's competition here
LIQT vs FSS Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while FSS trades at $118.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check FSS's competition here
LIQT vs AQUA Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check AQUA's competition here
LIQT vs ATMU Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while ATMU trades at $55.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ATMU's competition here
LIQT vs CECO Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while CECO trades at $81.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 204.45. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check CECO's competition here
LIQT vs PCT Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while PCT trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PCT's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check PCT's competition here
LIQT vs PCTTU Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while PCTTU trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -11.88. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check PCTTU's competition here
LIQT vs ERII Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 470.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while ERII trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ERII's competition here
LIQT vs CECE Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check CECE's competition here
LIQT vs PCTTW Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 298.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while PCTTW trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check PCTTW's competition here
LIQT vs ARQ Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 113.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while ARQ trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ARQ's competition here
LIQT vs ADES Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ADES's competition here
LIQT vs ZONE Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 87.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while ZONE trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -20.99. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ZONE's competition here
LIQT vs FTEK Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while FTEK trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -15.20. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check FTEK's competition here
LIQT vs BCHT Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, BCHT has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while BCHT trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas BCHT's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BCHT's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to BCHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check BCHT's competition here
LIQT vs SCWO Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while SCWO trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check SCWO's competition here
LIQT vs BHTG Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check BHTG's competition here
LIQT vs CLIR Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while CLIR trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -45.40. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check CLIR's competition here
LIQT vs TOMZ Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while TOMZ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check TOMZ's competition here
LIQT vs CLWT Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while CLWT trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 58.85. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check CLWT's competition here
LIQT vs MKUL Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check MKUL's competition here
LIQT vs RAINW Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while RAINW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check RAINW's competition here
LIQT vs DEVS Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 695.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while DEVS trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check DEVS's competition here
LIQT vs SPECW Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check SPECW's competition here
LIQT vs SPEC Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check SPEC's competition here
LIQT vs AERC Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check AERC's competition here
LIQT vs NEWA Comparison May 2026
LIQT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 22.6M. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $2.27, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.55, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.65%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check NEWA's competition here