LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while VLTO trades at $103.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check VLTO's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while AQUA trades at $49.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is similarly volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check AQUA's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while CECO trades at $57.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 49.56. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CECO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to CECO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check CECO's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 556.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while PCT trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PCT's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to PCT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check PCT's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 534.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while PCTTW trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check PCTTW's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 458.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while PCTTU trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check PCTTU's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while CECE trades at $11.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CECE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check CECE's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while ADUR trades at $9.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -24.31. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ADUR's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 341M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while ERII trades at $6.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to ERII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ERII's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while ADES trades at $3.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ADES's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while ARQ trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check ARQ's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while FTEK trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -12.45. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check FTEK's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while SCWO trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check SCWO's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, BCHT has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while BCHT trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BCHT's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BCHT's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to BCHT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check BCHT's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while BHTG trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check BHTG's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while CLIR trades at $2.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check CLIR's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while TOMZ trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check TOMZ's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while CLWT trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 65.53. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check CLWT's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while RAINW trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check RAINW's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, RAIN has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while RAIN trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas RAIN's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to RAIN's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to RAIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check RAIN's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while DEVS trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is more volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check DEVS's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while MKUL trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check MKUL's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while SPECW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check SPECW's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while AERC trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check AERC's competition here

LiqTech International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIQT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIQT stands at 11M. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIQT is priced at $0.33 on the NASDAQ, while NEWA trades at $4.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIQT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, LIQT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIQT is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIQT.Check NEWA's competition here