Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 23.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while VLTO trades at $95.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while AQUA trades at $49.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 5.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while FSS trades at $87.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, KTWIY has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while KTWIY trades at $67.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas KTWIY's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KTWIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to KTWIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, KTWIF has a market cap of 3.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while KTWIF trades at $33.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas KTWIF's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KTWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to KTWIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, MMNNF has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while MMNNF trades at $19.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas MMNNF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMNNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to MMNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while ATMU trades at $36.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, ORGJF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while ORGJF trades at $53.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas ORGJF's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORGJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ORGJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, UMICF has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while UMICF trades at $9.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas UMICF's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UMICF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to UMICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, UMICY has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while UMICY trades at $2.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas UMICY's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UMICY's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to UMICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, CCVTF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while CCVTF trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas CCVTF's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCVTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to CCVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while PCTTU trades at $7.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while PCT trades at $6.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCT's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, HIZOF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while HIZOF trades at $6.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas HIZOF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HIZOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to HIZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 894.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while CECO trades at $25.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 853.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while ERII trades at $15.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 38.95. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, TKUMF has a market cap of 723.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while TKUMF trades at $9.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas TKUMF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKUMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to TKUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, MTWTF has a market cap of 537.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while MTWTF trades at $12.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas MTWTF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTWTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to MTWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, PVARF has a market cap of 423.21M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while PVARF trades at $9.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas PVARF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PVARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PVARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 400.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while CECE trades at $11.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, GRPRF has a market cap of 307.64M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while GRPRF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas GRPRF's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to GRPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 251.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while PCTTW trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 173.92M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while ARQ trades at $4.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -29.43. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, AKCCF has a market cap of 158.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while AKCCF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas AKCCF's P/E ratio is -8.72. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AKCCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to AKCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, ACTHF has a market cap of 148.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while ACTHF trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas ACTHF's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACTHF's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to ACTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while ADES trades at $3.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, MEEC has a market cap of 72.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while MEEC trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas MEEC's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MEEC's ROE of +16.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to MEEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 43.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while SCWO trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, EMFGF has a market cap of 42.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while EMFGF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas EMFGF's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EMFGF's ROE of +385.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to EMFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, SSHPF has a market cap of 40.45M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while SSHPF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas SSHPF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSHPF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SSHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, SREMF has a market cap of 33.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while SREMF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas SREMF's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SREMF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SREMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 31.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while CLIR trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 29.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while FTEK trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while BHTG trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, SCAXF has a market cap of 25.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while SCAXF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas SCAXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCAXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SCAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, YEWTF has a market cap of 25.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while YEWTF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas YEWTF's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YEWTF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to YEWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, PGTK has a market cap of 23.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while PGTK trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas PGTK's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PGTK's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PGTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, BIRMF has a market cap of 20.98M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while BIRMF trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas BIRMF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIRMF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to BIRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 16.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while TOMZ trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 13.98M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while LIQT trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, TMGEF has a market cap of 13.78M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while TMGEF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas TMGEF's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TMGEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to TMGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 11.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while ZONE trades at $1.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, GRNWF has a market cap of 10.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while GRNWF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas GRNWF's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRNWF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to GRNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, INTWF has a market cap of 9.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while INTWF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas INTWF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INTWF's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to INTWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 8.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while CLWT trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, QUTIF has a market cap of 6.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while QUTIF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas QUTIF's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QUTIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to QUTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, BNET has a market cap of 6.79M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while BNET trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas BNET's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNET's ROE of +3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to BNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, DNDDF has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while DNDDF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas DNDDF's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DNDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to DNDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, QWTR has a market cap of 5.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while QWTR trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas QWTR's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QWTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to QWTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 5.90M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while DEVS trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, AETLF has a market cap of 5.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while AETLF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas AETLF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AETLF's ROE of -3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to AETLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, COSLF has a market cap of 4.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while COSLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas COSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COSLF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to COSLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, DRFS has a market cap of 3.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while DRFS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas DRFS's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DRFS's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to DRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, MGON has a market cap of 3.04M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while MGON trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas MGON's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGON's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to MGON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, KNOS has a market cap of 3.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while KNOS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas KNOS's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KNOS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to KNOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, DCTIF has a market cap of 2.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while DCTIF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas DCTIF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCTIF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to DCTIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, ENPRF has a market cap of 2.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while ENPRF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas ENPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENPRF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ENPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, GOGR has a market cap of 2.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while GOGR trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas GOGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOGR's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to GOGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while MKUL trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 1.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while RAINW trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, DOCKF has a market cap of 1.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while DOCKF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas DOCKF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DOCKF's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to DOCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, OWUV has a market cap of 1.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while OWUV trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas OWUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OWUV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to OWUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, EAWD has a market cap of 901679.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while EAWD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas EAWD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EAWD's ROE of +3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to EAWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, RAKR has a market cap of 628764.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while RAKR trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas RAKR's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to RAKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, ATMFF has a market cap of 527959.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while ATMFF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas ATMFF's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATMFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ATMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, LQWC has a market cap of 482358.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while LQWC trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas LQWC's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LQWC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to LQWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, ATGVF has a market cap of 472650.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while ATGVF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas ATGVF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATGVF's ROE of -9.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ATGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, TGTMF has a market cap of 463000.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while TGTMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas TGTMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TGTMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to TGTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, SFBE has a market cap of 427149.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while SFBE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas SFBE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFBE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to SFBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, GWTR has a market cap of 332021.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while GWTR trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas GWTR's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GWTR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to GWTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, TNKE has a market cap of 265934.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while TNKE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas TNKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to TNKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, EESH has a market cap of 110797.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while EESH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas EESH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EESH's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to EESH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, XLPI has a market cap of 86265.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while XLPI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas XLPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XLPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to XLPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, PCTL has a market cap of 80560.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while PCTL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas PCTL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCTL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to PCTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, WTII has a market cap of 77017.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while WTII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas WTII's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTII's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to WTII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, ESFS has a market cap of 75086.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while ESFS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas ESFS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESFS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ESFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71552.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while SPECW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, MSBN has a market cap of 53168.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while MSBN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas MSBN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MSBN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to MSBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, GLEC has a market cap of 49990.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while GLEC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas GLEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to GLEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, AKMYF has a market cap of 35252.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while AKMYF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas AKMYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AKMYF's ROE of +9.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to AKMYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, ETII has a market cap of 26205.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while ETII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas ETII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ETII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to ETII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, WTNW has a market cap of 24267.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while WTNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas WTNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTNW's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to WTNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 20402.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while SPEC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, SINX has a market cap of 18953.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while SINX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas SINX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SINX's ROE of +2.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SINX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, GCHK has a market cap of 16136.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while GCHK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas GCHK's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GCHK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to GCHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, SYEV has a market cap of 15984.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while SYEV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas SYEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYEV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to SYEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, UVFT has a market cap of 13416.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while UVFT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas UVFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UVFT's ROE of +1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to UVFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, PURA has a market cap of 11414.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while PURA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas PURA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PURA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PURA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, SMVS has a market cap of 8523.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while SMVS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas SMVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMVS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to SMVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, GRCO has a market cap of 8291.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while GRCO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas GRCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to GRCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, CGYV has a market cap of 6210.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while CGYV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas CGYV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGYV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to CGYV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, ROBXF has a market cap of 5605.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while ROBXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas ROBXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROBXF's ROE of +12.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ROBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, GMEV has a market cap of 5411.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while GMEV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas GMEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GMEV's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to GMEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, EMHI has a market cap of 4017.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while EMHI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas EMHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EMHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to EMHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, RENO has a market cap of 3520.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while RENO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas RENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RENO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to RENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, EAUI has a market cap of 2858.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while EAUI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas EAUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EAUI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to EAUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, MPML has a market cap of 1001.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while MPML trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas MPML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MPML's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to MPML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, HTHL has a market cap of 229.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while HTHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas HTHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HTHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to HTHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, FQCC has a market cap of 4.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while FQCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas FQCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FQCC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to FQCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, AERC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while AERC trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.

ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 5.85B. In comparison, NEWA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $34.75, while NEWA trades at $4.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.