Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation ZWS Peers
See (ZWS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZWS | $35.39 | -0.48% | 6B | 36.86 | $0.96 | +0.99% |
| VLTO | $96.75 | -0.29% | 24B | 27.64 | $3.50 | +0.41% |
| FSS | $101.01 | -1.15% | 6.2B | 29.62 | $3.41 | +0.52% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $18.00 | +29.17% | 3.1B | -28.89 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ATMU | $35.04 | -0.51% | 2.9B | 15.78 | $2.22 | +0.57% |
| PCT | $13.02 | -4.89% | 2.3B | -11.03 | -$1.18 | N/A |
| CECO | $28.49 | -2.96% | 1B | 21.92 | $1.30 | N/A |
| PCTTW | $4.15 | -2.81% | 745.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ERII | $12.03 | -1.23% | 655.6M | 33.42 | $0.36 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZWS vs VLTO Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while VLTO trades at $96.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs FSS Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while FSS trades at $101.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs AQUA Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs PCTTU Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while PCTTU trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -28.89. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs ATMU Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while ATMU trades at $35.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs PCT Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while PCT trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -11.03. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs CECO Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while CECO trades at $28.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs PCTTW Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 745.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while PCTTW trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs ERII Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 655.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while ERII trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs CECE Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs ARQ Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 205.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while ARQ trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -97.20. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs ADES Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs FTEK Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while FTEK trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs SCWO Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while SCWO trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs CLIR Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while CLIR trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs BHTG Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs ZONE Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while ZONE trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -17.97. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs TOMZ Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while TOMZ trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs LIQT Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while LIQT trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs DEVS Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while DEVS trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs CLWT Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while CLWT trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs MKUL Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs RAINW Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 758.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while RAINW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs SPECW Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs SPEC Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 20.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs NEWA Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.
ZWS vs AERC Comparison
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 6B. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $35.39, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.86, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.