Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ZWS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZWS | $45.73 | -0.28% | 7.7B | 40.83 | $1.12 | +0.87% |
| VLTO | $90.20 | +0.49% | 22.4B | 23.99 | $3.76 | +0.51% |
| FSS | $105.42 | -1.17% | 6.4B | 26.28 | $4.01 | +0.54% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $56.57 | -0.72% | 4.6B | 22.61 | $2.50 | +0.38% |
| CECO | $54.50 | +0.40% | 1.9B | 39.78 | $1.37 | N/A |
| PCT | $5.76 | +1.41% | 1B | -4.76 | -$1.21 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $6.20 | +0.00% | 851.2M | -9.95 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ERII | $10.05 | -1.86% | 532.4M | 23.93 | $0.42 | N/A |
| CECE | $11.65 | +2.19% | 401M | 58.25 | $0.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZWS vs VLTO Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while VLTO trades at $90.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check VLTO's competition here
ZWS vs FSS Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while FSS trades at $105.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check FSS's competition here
ZWS vs AQUA Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check AQUA's competition here
ZWS vs ATMU Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while ATMU trades at $56.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ATMU's competition here
ZWS vs CECO Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while CECO trades at $54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 39.78. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check CECO's competition here
ZWS vs PCT Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while PCT trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCT's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check PCT's competition here
ZWS vs PCTTU Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 851.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while PCTTU trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -9.95. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check PCTTU's competition here
ZWS vs ERII Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 532.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while ERII trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ERII's competition here
ZWS vs CECE Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check CECE's competition here
ZWS vs ADES Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ADES's competition here
ZWS vs PCTTW Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while PCTTW trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check PCTTW's competition here
ZWS vs ARQ Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while ARQ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -19.20. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ARQ's competition here
ZWS vs ZONE Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 70.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while ZONE trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -16.80. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ZONE's competition here
ZWS vs FTEK Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while FTEK trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check FTEK's competition here
ZWS vs SCWO Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while SCWO trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check SCWO's competition here
ZWS vs BHTG Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check BHTG's competition here
ZWS vs CLIR Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while CLIR trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check CLIR's competition here
ZWS vs LIQT Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while LIQT trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check LIQT's competition here
ZWS vs TOMZ Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while TOMZ trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check TOMZ's competition here
ZWS vs CLWT Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while CLWT trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check CLWT's competition here
ZWS vs DEVS Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while DEVS trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check DEVS's competition here
ZWS vs MKUL Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check MKUL's competition here
ZWS vs RAINW Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while RAINW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check RAINW's competition here
ZWS vs SPECW Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check SPECW's competition here
ZWS vs SPEC Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 3.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check SPEC's competition here
ZWS vs NEWA Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check NEWA's competition here
ZWS vs AERC Comparison March 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 7.7B. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $45.73, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check AERC's competition here