Westwater Resources, Inc.
Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WWR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WWR | $0.80 | -3.67% | 61.7M | -3.78 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| RIO | $63.10 | -1.14% | 102.7B | 8.92 | $7.07 | +6.38% |
| BHP | $53.15 | -1.72% | 67.4B | 11.87 | $4.48 | +4.64% |
| VALE | $10.00 | -2.25% | 42.7B | 7.25 | $1.38 | +8.33% |
| TECK | $33.00 | -6.04% | 16.2B | 659.80 | $0.05 | +2.19% |
| MP | $62.08 | +0.84% | 11B | -98.57 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| TMC | $7.79 | -3.83% | 3.1B | -33.87 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| MTRN | $94.80 | +0.66% | 2B | 197.65 | $0.48 | +0.57% |
| SKE | $15.46 | -3.86% | 1.8B | -13.21 | -$1.17 | N/A |
| STR | $18.37 | -0.43% | 1.4B | 35.35 | $0.52 | +7.27% |
Stock Comparison
WWR vs RIO Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 102.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while RIO trades at $63.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check RIO's competition here
WWR vs BHP Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while BHP trades at $53.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check BHP's competition here
WWR vs VALE Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while VALE trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check VALE's competition here
WWR vs TECK Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while TECK trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 659.80. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check TECK's competition here
WWR vs MP Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while MP trades at $62.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -98.57. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check MP's competition here
WWR vs TMC Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while TMC trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -33.87. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TMC's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check TMC's competition here
WWR vs MTRN Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while MTRN trades at $94.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 197.65. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check MTRN's competition here
WWR vs SKE Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while SKE trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check SKE's competition here
WWR vs STR Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while STR trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 35.35. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check STR's competition here
WWR vs IPX Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while IPX trades at $40.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -17.34. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check IPX's competition here
WWR vs USAR Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while USAR trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to USAR's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check USAR's competition here
WWR vs VZLA Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while VZLA trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -164.99. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check VZLA's competition here
WWR vs CMP Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 848M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while CMP trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check CMP's competition here
WWR vs GSM Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 843.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while GSM trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check GSM's competition here
WWR vs TMCWW Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 829.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while TMCWW trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check TMCWW's competition here
WWR vs SGML Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 792.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while SGML trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -21.58. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check SGML's competition here
WWR vs LAC Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 669.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while LAC trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check LAC's competition here
WWR vs NEXA Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 666.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while NEXA trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check NEXA's competition here
WWR vs USAS Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 641.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while USAS trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check USAS's competition here
WWR vs LAR Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 523.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while LAR trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -46.14. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check LAR's competition here
WWR vs SLI Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 522.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while SLI trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check SLI's competition here
WWR vs NAK Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 479.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while NAK trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check NAK's competition here
WWR vs LAAC Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check LAAC's competition here
WWR vs CRMLW Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 431.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while CRMLW trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check CRMLW's competition here
WWR vs CRML Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 427.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while CRML trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check CRML's competition here
WWR vs PLM Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check PLM's competition here
WWR vs GRFX Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check GRFX's competition here
WWR vs UAMY Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while UAMY trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -334.50. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check UAMY's competition here
WWR vs LZM Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 379M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while LZM trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check LZM's competition here
WWR vs USARW Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 342.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while USARW trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to USARW's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check USARW's competition here
WWR vs EMX Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 339.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while EMX trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -104.83. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check EMX's competition here
WWR vs TMQ Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 316.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while TMQ trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -32.08. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check TMQ's competition here
WWR vs NMG Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 309.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while NMG trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check NMG's competition here
WWR vs ABAT Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 291.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while ABAT trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check ABAT's competition here
WWR vs WRN Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 266M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while WRN trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -66.50. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check WRN's competition here
WWR vs NB Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 228.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while NB trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -16.53. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check NB's competition here
WWR vs IONR Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 200.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while IONR trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -14.78. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check IONR's competition here
WWR vs PLL Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while PLL trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check PLL's competition here
WWR vs USGO Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 103.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while USGO trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -11.81. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check USGO's competition here
WWR vs LGO Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while LGO trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check LGO's competition here
WWR vs FURY Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 88.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while FURY trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check FURY's competition here
WWR vs AMLI Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while AMLI trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check AMLI's competition here
WWR vs GRO Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while GRO trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check GRO's competition here
WWR vs XPL Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while XPL trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check XPL's competition here
WWR vs LITM Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while LITM trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check LITM's competition here
WWR vs ELBM Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while ELBM trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check ELBM's competition here
WWR vs GTI Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while GTI trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is less volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check GTI's competition here
WWR vs BYU Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check BYU's competition here
WWR vs STR-WT Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 239.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check STR-WT's competition here
WWR vs GLG Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check GLG's competition here
WWR vs KMCM Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WWR has daily volatility of 10.67 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.Check KMCM's competition here
WWR vs IFFT Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IFFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check IFFT's competition here
WWR vs VEDL Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check VEDL's competition here
WWR vs EXN Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check EXN's competition here
WWR vs BBL Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check BBL's competition here
WWR vs SMTS Comparison July 2025
WWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWR stands at 61.7M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WWR is priced at $0.80, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, WWR's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WWR is more volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWR.Check SMTS's competition here