TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TMC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMC | $5.43 | +5.85% | 2.4B | -6.46 | -$0.84 | N/A |
| BHP | $90.82 | +3.20% | 230.7B | 22.59 | $4.02 | +2.94% |
| RIO | $105.35 | +1.65% | 171.1B | 17.30 | $6.09 | +3.82% |
| VALE | $15.71 | +2.28% | 67B | 23.79 | $0.66 | +6.49% |
| TECK | $64.84 | +1.95% | 31.2B | 24.01 | $2.70 | +0.56% |
| MP | $57.55 | +0.65% | 10.2B | -143.94 | -$0.40 | N/A |
| EMAT | $6.81 | -3.13% | 5.4B | -9.59 | -$0.71 | N/A |
| MTRN | $247.26 | +0.51% | 5.1B | 67.64 | $3.65 | +0.23% |
| SKE | $28.11 | +7.87% | 3.5B | -18.74 | -$1.50 | N/A |
| TMCWW | $0.26 | +1.96% | 2.4B | -0.41 | -$0.63 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TMC vs BHP Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 230.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while BHP trades at $90.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check BHP's competition here
TMC vs RIO Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 171.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while RIO trades at $105.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check RIO's competition here
TMC vs VALE Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while VALE trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check VALE's competition here
TMC vs TECK Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while TECK trades at $64.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check TECK's competition here
TMC vs MP Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while MP trades at $57.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -143.94. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check MP's competition here
TMC vs EMAT Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, EMAT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while EMAT trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas EMAT's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to EMAT's ROE of +37.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to EMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check EMAT's competition here
TMC vs MTRN Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while MTRN trades at $247.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 67.64. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check MTRN's competition here
TMC vs SKE Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while SKE trades at $28.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check SKE's competition here
TMC vs TMCWW Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while TMCWW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +65.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is less volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check TMCWW's competition here
TMC vs USAR Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while USAR trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to USAR's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check USAR's competition here
TMC vs NEXA Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while NEXA trades at $13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to NEXA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check NEXA's competition here
TMC vs SGML Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while SGML trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -40.97. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check SGML's competition here
TMC vs LAR Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while LAR trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -25.34. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check LAR's competition here
TMC vs USAS Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while USAS trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -23.98. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to USAS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check USAS's competition here
TMC vs STR-WT Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check STR-WT's competition here
TMC vs STR Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while STR trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check STR's competition here
TMC vs CMP Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while CMP trades at $31.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is 196.53. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to CMP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check CMP's competition here
TMC vs VZLA Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while VZLA trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -10.23. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check VZLA's competition here
TMC vs IPX Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while IPX trades at $36.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -18.02. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check IPX's competition here
TMC vs NAK Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while NAK trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check NAK's competition here
TMC vs UAMY Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while UAMY trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -58.67. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check UAMY's competition here
TMC vs LAC Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while LAC trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -10.07. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check LAC's competition here
TMC vs CRML Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 925M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while CRML trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to CRML's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check CRML's competition here
TMC vs CRMLW Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 868.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while CRMLW trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check CRMLW's competition here
TMC vs NB Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 786.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while NB trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -9.31. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to NB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check NB's competition here
TMC vs GSM Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 764.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while GSM trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check GSM's competition here
TMC vs SLI Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 734.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while SLI trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is -15.63. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to SLI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check SLI's competition here
TMC vs TMQ Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 678.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while TMQ trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -14.04. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check TMQ's competition here
TMC vs WRN Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 544.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while WRN trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is 241.50. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check WRN's competition here
TMC vs TMCR Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TMCR has a market cap of 522M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while TMCR trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas TMCR's P/E ratio is -30.58. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to TMCR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is less volatile compared to TMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check TMCR's competition here
TMC vs EMX Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 454M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while EMX trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is 83.20. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check EMX's competition here
TMC vs LAAC Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check LAAC's competition here
TMC vs PLM Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check PLM's competition here
TMC vs GRFX Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check GRFX's competition here
TMC vs ABAT Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 355M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while ABAT trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check ABAT's competition here
TMC vs LZM Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 351.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while LZM trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check LZM's competition here
TMC vs IONR Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 250M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while IONR trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -36.27. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check IONR's competition here
TMC vs NMG Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 249.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while NMG trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to NMG's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check NMG's competition here
TMC vs TII Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TII has a market cap of 217.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while TII trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas TII's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to TII's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to TII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check TII's competition here
TMC vs PLL Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 159.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while PLL trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check PLL's competition here
TMC vs NICM Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NICM has a market cap of 116.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while NICM trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas NICM's P/E ratio is -23.65. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to NICM's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to NICM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check NICM's competition here
TMC vs USGO Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 107.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while USGO trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -13.64. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check USGO's competition here
TMC vs USARW Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while USARW trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to USARW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check USARW's competition here
TMC vs FURY Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 100.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while FURY trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to FURY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check FURY's competition here
TMC vs GRO Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while GRO trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check GRO's competition here
TMC vs XPL Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while XPL trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -19.85. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check XPL's competition here
TMC vs AEC Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AEC has a market cap of 73.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while AEC trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas AEC's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to AEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to AEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check AEC's competition here
TMC vs ELBM Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while ELBM trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check ELBM's competition here
TMC vs LGO Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while LGO trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check LGO's competition here
TMC vs WWR Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 43M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while WWR trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check WWR's competition here
TMC vs FEAM Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while FEAM trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check FEAM's competition here
TMC vs BYU Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to BYU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check BYU's competition here
TMC vs GTI Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while GTI trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to GTI's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check GTI's competition here
TMC vs GLG Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check GLG's competition here
TMC vs KMCM Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TMC has daily volatility of 12.41 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.Check KMCM's competition here
TMC vs BBL Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check BBL's competition here
TMC vs VEDL Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check VEDL's competition here
TMC vs SMTS Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check SMTS's competition here
TMC vs EXN Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check EXN's competition here
TMC vs IFFT Comparison June 2026
TMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMC stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMC is priced at $5.43, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMC currently has a P/E ratio of -6.46, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, TMC's ROE is +65.43%, compared to IFFT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMC is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMC.Check IFFT's competition here