W.R. Berkley Corporation 5.10% (WRB-PF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WRB-PF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRB-PF | $18.87 | +0.32% | 26.9B | 4.01 | $4.71 | +2.65% |
| CB | $356.53 | -1.28% | 138.2B | 12.74 | $27.97 | +1.11% |
| PGR | $231.67 | -0.23% | 135.3B | 12.48 | $18.56 | +6.03% |
| TRV | $339.17 | -0.92% | 72.1B | 10.13 | $33.49 | +1.34% |
| ALL-PI | $18.60 | +0.05% | 64.5B | 0.40 | $46.89 | +1.68% |
| ALL-PJ | $26.01 | +0.15% | 64.1B | 0.56 | $46.89 | +1.68% |
| ALL | $248.37 | -0.78% | 64B | 5.91 | $42.07 | +1.68% |
| ALL-PB | $25.53 | +0.16% | 53.1B | 0.54 | $46.89 | +1.68% |
| ALL-PH | $20.02 | +0.30% | 49.8B | 0.43 | $46.89 | +1.68% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.68% |
Stock Comparison
WRB-PF vs CB Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 138.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while CB trades at $356.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check CB's competition here
WRB-PF vs PGR Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 135.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while PGR trades at $231.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check PGR's competition here
WRB-PF vs TRV Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while TRV trades at $339.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check TRV's competition here
WRB-PF vs ALL-PI Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while ALL-PI trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ALL-PI's competition here
WRB-PF vs ALL-PJ Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
WRB-PF vs ALL Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while ALL trades at $248.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ALL's competition here
WRB-PF vs ALL-PB Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while ALL-PB trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ALL-PB's competition here
WRB-PF vs ALL-PH Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while ALL-PH trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ALL-PH's competition here
WRB-PF vs ALL-PG Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ALL-PG's competition here
WRB-PF vs CINF Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while CINF trades at $189.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check CINF's competition here
WRB-PF vs WRB-PG Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while WRB-PG trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check WRB-PG's competition here
WRB-PF vs WRB-PE Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while WRB-PE trades at $21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check WRB-PE's competition here
WRB-PF vs WRB Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while WRB trades at $70.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check WRB's competition here
WRB-PF vs WRB-PH Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while WRB-PH trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check WRB-PH's competition here
WRB-PF vs MKL Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while MKL trades at $1,978.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check MKL's competition here
WRB-PF vs L Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while L trades at $116.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas L's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check L's competition here
WRB-PF vs HIG-PG Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while HIG-PG trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check HIG-PG's competition here
WRB-PF vs CNA Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while CNA trades at $51.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check CNA's competition here
WRB-PF vs ERIE Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while ERIE trades at $257.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ERIE's competition here
WRB-PF vs AFG Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while AFG trades at $142.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AFG's competition here
WRB-PF vs KNSL Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while KNSL trades at $347.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check KNSL's competition here
WRB-PF vs THG Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while THG trades at $220.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check THG's competition here
WRB-PF vs ACT Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while ACT trades at $45.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ACT's competition here
WRB-PF vs MCY Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while MCY trades at $111.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check MCY's competition here
WRB-PF vs LMND Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while LMND trades at $78.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -42.04. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check LMND's competition here
WRB-PF vs SIGIP Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while SIGIP trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check SIGIP's competition here
WRB-PF vs SIGI Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while SIGI trades at $98.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check SIGI's competition here
WRB-PF vs RLI Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while RLI trades at $61.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check RLI's competition here
WRB-PF vs HGTY Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while HGTY trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 40.80. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check HGTY's competition here
WRB-PF vs PLMR Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while PLMR trades at $142.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check PLMR's competition here
WRB-PF vs HGTY-WT Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
WRB-PF vs AHL Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AHL's competition here
WRB-PF vs ARX Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ARX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while ARX trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas ARX's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARX's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to ARX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ARX's competition here
WRB-PF vs SKWD Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while SKWD trades at $60.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check SKWD's competition here
WRB-PF vs SLDE Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while SLDE trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check SLDE's competition here
WRB-PF vs HCI Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while HCI trades at $181.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check HCI's competition here
WRB-PF vs HMN Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while HMN trades at $54.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check HMN's competition here
WRB-PF vs STC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while STC trades at $67.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check STC's competition here
WRB-PF vs KMPB Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while KMPB trades at $23.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check KMPB's competition here
WRB-PF vs KMPR Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while KMPR trades at $28.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check KMPR's competition here
WRB-PF vs AFGB Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while AFGB trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AFGB's competition here
WRB-PF vs AFGD Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while AFGD trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AFGD's competition here
WRB-PF vs AFGC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while AFGC trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is 1.66. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AFGC's competition here
WRB-PF vs UFCS Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while UFCS trades at $52.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check UFCS's competition here
WRB-PF vs AFGE Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while AFGE trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AFGE's competition here
WRB-PF vs PRA Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while PRA trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check PRA's competition here
WRB-PF vs ASIC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while ASIC trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ASIC's competition here
WRB-PF vs UVE Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while UVE trades at $42.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check UVE's competition here
WRB-PF vs SAFT Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while SAFT trades at $77.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check SAFT's competition here
WRB-PF vs ARGO Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ARGO's competition here
WRB-PF vs BOW Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while BOW trades at $31.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check BOW's competition here
WRB-PF vs MHLA Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 965M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while MHLA trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is 118.31. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check MHLA's competition here
WRB-PF vs ROOT Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 897.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while ROOT trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ROOT's competition here
WRB-PF vs HRTG Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 830.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while HRTG trades at $27.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check HRTG's competition here
WRB-PF vs DGICA Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 698.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while DGICA trades at $19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check DGICA's competition here
WRB-PF vs DGICB Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while DGICB trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check DGICB's competition here
WRB-PF vs ACIC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 550.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while ACIC trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ACIC's competition here
WRB-PF vs AII Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 368M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while AII trades at $18.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AII's competition here
WRB-PF vs GBLI Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 357.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while GBLI trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check GBLI's competition here
WRB-PF vs UIHC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check UIHC's competition here
WRB-PF vs NODK Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 323M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while NODK trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -78.85. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check NODK's competition here
WRB-PF vs KINS Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while KINS trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check KINS's competition here
WRB-PF vs PRHIZ Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 243.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while PRHIZ trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check PRHIZ's competition here
WRB-PF vs YSXT Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while YSXT trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check YSXT's competition here
WRB-PF vs CNFR Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check CNFR's competition here
WRB-PF vs CNFRZ Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check CNFRZ's competition here
WRB-PF vs PRHI Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while PRHI trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check PRHI's competition here
WRB-PF vs UNAM Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check UNAM's competition here
WRB-PF vs ARGO-PA Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
WRB-PF vs NSEC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check NSEC's competition here
WRB-PF vs STFC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check STFC's competition here
WRB-PF vs Y Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check Y's competition here
WRB-PF vs AFSI Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AFSI's competition here
WRB-PF vs GFZ Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check GFZ's competition here
WRB-PF vs CNFRL Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check CNFRL's competition here
WRB-PF vs AFHBL Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AFHBL's competition here
WRB-PF vs ENH Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ENH's competition here
WRB-PF vs AHL-PC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AHL-PC's competition here
WRB-PF vs GBLIL Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check GBLIL's competition here
WRB-PF vs FNHC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check FNHC's competition here
WRB-PF vs MILEW Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check MILEW's competition here
WRB-PF vs MILE Comparison July 2026
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.9B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $18.87, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.01, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check MILE's competition here