Safety Insurance Group, Inc.
Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (SAFT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SAFT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFT | $72.73 | +0.29% | 1.1B | 17.19 | $4.23 | +5.02% |
| CB | $330.06 | -0.08% | 128B | 11.68 | $28.27 | +1.17% |
| PGR | $202.91 | -0.53% | 118.6B | 10.33 | $19.65 | +6.83% |
| TRV | $305.46 | -0.17% | 65B | 9.12 | $33.51 | +1.44% |
| ALL | $224.59 | +1.53% | 57.8B | 4.97 | $45.19 | +1.84% |
| ALL-PB | $25.88 | -0.02% | 53.9B | 2.15 | $12.04 | +1.84% |
| ALL-PH | $20.14 | -0.89% | 50.1B | 3.35 | $6.01 | +1.84% |
| HIG | $135.04 | -1.12% | 37B | 9.50 | $14.22 | +1.64% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.84% |
| CINF | $167.85 | +0.12% | 26B | 9.60 | $17.49 | +2.11% |
Stock Comparison
SAFT vs CB Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 128B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while CB trades at $330.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CB's competition here
SAFT vs PGR Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 118.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while PGR trades at $202.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PGR's competition here
SAFT vs TRV Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while TRV trades at $305.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check TRV's competition here
SAFT vs ALL Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while ALL trades at $224.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PB Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while ALL-PB trades at $25.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PB's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PH Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while ALL-PH trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PH's competition here
SAFT vs HIG Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while HIG trades at $135.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HIG's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PG Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PG's competition here
SAFT vs CINF Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while CINF trades at $167.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CINF's competition here
SAFT vs WRB Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while WRB trades at $68.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB's competition here
SAFT vs MKL Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while MKL trades at $1,860.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MKL's competition here
SAFT vs L Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while L trades at $107.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check L's competition here
SAFT vs HIG-PG Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while HIG-PG trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HIG-PG's competition here
SAFT vs CNA Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while CNA trades at $44.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CNA's competition here
SAFT vs AFG Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while AFG trades at $136.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFG's competition here
SAFT vs WRB-PE Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while WRB-PE trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB-PE's competition here
SAFT vs AXS Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while AXS trades at $100.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AXS's competition here
SAFT vs KNSL Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while KNSL trades at $313.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check KNSL's competition here
SAFT vs AXS-PE Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while AXS-PE trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AXS-PE's competition here
SAFT vs WRB-PF Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while WRB-PF trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB-PF's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PJ Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while ALL-PJ trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
SAFT vs THG Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while THG trades at $193.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check THG's competition here
SAFT vs WRB-PG Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while WRB-PG trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB-PG's competition here
SAFT vs WRB-PH Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while WRB-PH trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB-PH's competition here
SAFT vs MCY Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while MCY trades at $101.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MCY's competition here
SAFT vs WTM Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while WTM trades at $2,141.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WTM's competition here
SAFT vs SIGI Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while SIGI trades at $88.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check SIGI's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PI Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while ALL-PI trades at $18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PI's competition here
SAFT vs RLI Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while RLI trades at $52.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check RLI's competition here
SAFT vs LMND Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while LMND trades at $53.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -29.17. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check LMND's competition here
SAFT vs HGTY Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while HGTY trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 46.07. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HGTY's competition here
SAFT vs HGTY-WT Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
SAFT vs AHL Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AHL's competition here
SAFT vs PLMR Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while PLMR trades at $113.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PLMR's competition here
SAFT vs AHL-PD Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while AHL-PD trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -84.69. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AHL-PD's competition here
SAFT vs SLDE Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while SLDE trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check SLDE's competition here
SAFT vs STC Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while STC trades at $66.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check STC's competition here
SAFT vs HCI Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while HCI trades at $155.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HCI's competition here
SAFT vs SKWD Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while SKWD trades at $47.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check SKWD's competition here
SAFT vs AHL-PE Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while AHL-PE trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -84.40. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AHL-PE's competition here
SAFT vs HMN Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while HMN trades at $46.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HMN's competition here
SAFT vs AFGB Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while AFGB trades at $21.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFGB's competition here
SAFT vs KMPR Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while KMPR trades at $29.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 40.51. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check KMPR's competition here
SAFT vs AFGD Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while AFGD trades at $19.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFGD's competition here
SAFT vs AFGC Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while AFGC trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFGC's competition here
SAFT vs KMPB Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while KMPB trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check KMPB's competition here
SAFT vs AFGE Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while AFGE trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFGE's competition here
SAFT vs PRA Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while PRA trades at $24.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PRA's competition here
SAFT vs UFCS Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while UFCS trades at $48.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check UFCS's competition here
SAFT vs UVE Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while UVE trades at $39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check UVE's competition here
SAFT vs MHLA Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while MHLA trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MHLA's competition here
SAFT vs ARGO Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ARGO's competition here
SAFT vs ASIC Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 997.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while ASIC trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ASIC's competition here
SAFT vs SIGIP Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 993M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while SIGIP trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check SIGIP's competition here
SAFT vs BOW Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 942.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while BOW trades at $28.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check BOW's competition here
SAFT vs ROOT Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 751.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while ROOT trades at $53.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ROOT's competition here
SAFT vs HRTG Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 703.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while HRTG trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HRTG's competition here
SAFT vs DGICB Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 693.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while DGICB trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check DGICB's competition here
SAFT vs DGICA Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 637.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while DGICA trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check DGICA's competition here
SAFT vs ACIC Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 536M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while ACIC trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ACIC's competition here
SAFT vs GBLI Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 393.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while GBLI trades at $27.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check GBLI's competition here
SAFT vs UIHC Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check UIHC's competition here
SAFT vs AII Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 323.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while AII trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AII's competition here
SAFT vs NODK Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 286.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while NODK trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -66.67. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check NODK's competition here
SAFT vs PRHIZ Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 234.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while PRHIZ trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PRHIZ's competition here
SAFT vs KINS Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 220.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while KINS trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check KINS's competition here
SAFT vs CNFR Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CNFR's competition here
SAFT vs CNFRZ Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CNFRZ's competition here
SAFT vs PRHI Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while PRHI trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PRHI's competition here
SAFT vs UNAM Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check UNAM's competition here
SAFT vs HALL Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 127.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while HALL trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HALL's competition here
SAFT vs ARGO-PA Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
SAFT vs MILEW Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MILEW's competition here
SAFT vs Y Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check Y's competition here
SAFT vs GBLIL Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check GBLIL's competition here
SAFT vs AFHBL Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFHBL's competition here
SAFT vs NSEC Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check NSEC's competition here
SAFT vs STFC Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check STFC's competition here
SAFT vs ENH Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ENH's competition here
SAFT vs CNFRL Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CNFRL's competition here
SAFT vs GFZ Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check GFZ's competition here
SAFT vs AFSI Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFSI's competition here
SAFT vs FNHC Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check FNHC's competition here
SAFT vs MILE Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MILE's competition here
SAFT vs AHL-PC Comparison May 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $72.73, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.19, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AHL-PC's competition here