Safety Insurance Group, Inc.
Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (SAFT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SAFT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFT | $76.70 | +0.78% | 1.1B | 11.35 | $6.70 | +4.81% |
| CB | $325.39 | -2.25% | 127.2B | 11.54 | $28.26 | +1.19% |
| PGR | $202.93 | -1.17% | 117.5B | 10.22 | $19.65 | +6.91% |
| TRV | $304.24 | -1.01% | 64.4B | 9.03 | $33.52 | +1.45% |
| ALL | $214.78 | -0.82% | 55.3B | 5.60 | $38.05 | +1.91% |
| ALL-PB | $25.95 | +0.29% | 54B | 2.15 | $12.04 | +1.91% |
| ALL-PH | $21.04 | +0.10% | 52.3B | 3.38 | $6.23 | +1.91% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.91% |
| CINF | $165.59 | -1.54% | 25.6B | 10.84 | $15.17 | +2.15% |
| WRB | $66.24 | -3.23% | 24.9B | 14.09 | $4.72 | +2.80% |
Stock Comparison
SAFT vs CB Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 127.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while CB trades at $325.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CB's competition here
SAFT vs PGR Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 117.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while PGR trades at $202.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PGR's competition here
SAFT vs TRV Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while TRV trades at $304.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check TRV's competition here
SAFT vs ALL Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while ALL trades at $214.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PB Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while ALL-PB trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PB's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PH Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while ALL-PH trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PH's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PG Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PG's competition here
SAFT vs CINF Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while CINF trades at $165.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CINF's competition here
SAFT vs WRB Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while WRB trades at $66.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB's competition here
SAFT vs MKL Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while MKL trades at $1,907.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MKL's competition here
SAFT vs L Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while L trades at $111.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check L's competition here
SAFT vs CNA Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while CNA trades at $48.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CNA's competition here
SAFT vs AFG Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while AFG trades at $130.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFG's competition here
SAFT vs WRB-PE Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while WRB-PE trades at $21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB-PE's competition here
SAFT vs KNSL Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while KNSL trades at $329.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check KNSL's competition here
SAFT vs AXS Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while AXS trades at $99.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AXS's competition here
SAFT vs WRB-PF Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while WRB-PF trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB-PF's competition here
SAFT vs AXS-PE Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while AXS-PE trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AXS-PE's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PJ Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
SAFT vs THG Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while THG trades at $180.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check THG's competition here
SAFT vs WRB-PG Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while WRB-PG trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB-PG's competition here
SAFT vs WRB-PH Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while WRB-PH trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB-PH's competition here
SAFT vs WTM Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while WTM trades at $2,271.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WTM's competition here
SAFT vs MCY Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while MCY trades at $97.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MCY's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PI Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while ALL-PI trades at $19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PI's competition here
SAFT vs LMND Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while LMND trades at $66.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -29.33. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check LMND's competition here
SAFT vs SIGI Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while SIGI trades at $84.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check SIGI's competition here
SAFT vs RLI Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while RLI trades at $51.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check RLI's competition here
SAFT vs HGTY Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while HGTY trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HGTY's competition here
SAFT vs HGTY-WT Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
SAFT vs AHL Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AHL's competition here
SAFT vs PLMR Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while PLMR trades at $126.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PLMR's competition here
SAFT vs AHL-PD Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while AHL-PD trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -87.04. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AHL-PD's competition here
SAFT vs SLDE Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while SLDE trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check SLDE's competition here
SAFT vs STC Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while STC trades at $71.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check STC's competition here
SAFT vs SKWD Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while SKWD trades at $45.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check SKWD's competition here
SAFT vs HCI Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while HCI trades at $155.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HCI's competition here
SAFT vs KMPR Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while KMPR trades at $33.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check KMPR's competition here
SAFT vs AHL-PE Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while AHL-PE trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -86.09. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AHL-PE's competition here
SAFT vs HMN Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while HMN trades at $45.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HMN's competition here
SAFT vs AFGB Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while AFGB trades at $21.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFGB's competition here
SAFT vs AFGD Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while AFGD trades at $20.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFGD's competition here
SAFT vs AFGC Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while AFGC trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFGC's competition here
SAFT vs KMPB Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while KMPB trades at $23.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check KMPB's competition here
SAFT vs AFGE Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while AFGE trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFGE's competition here
SAFT vs PRA Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while PRA trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PRA's competition here
SAFT vs UVE Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while UVE trades at $40.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check UVE's competition here
SAFT vs ARGO Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ARGO's competition here
SAFT vs UFCS Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while UFCS trades at $40.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check UFCS's competition here
SAFT vs MHLA Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 995.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while MHLA trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MHLA's competition here
SAFT vs SIGIP Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 993.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while SIGIP trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check SIGIP's competition here
SAFT vs ASIC Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 989.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while ASIC trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ASIC's competition here
SAFT vs HRTG Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 904M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while HRTG trades at $30.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HRTG's competition here
SAFT vs ROOT Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 793M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while ROOT trades at $55.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ROOT's competition here
SAFT vs BOW Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 784.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while BOW trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check BOW's competition here
SAFT vs DGICB Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 731.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while DGICB trades at $19.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check DGICB's competition here
SAFT vs DGICA Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 644M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while DGICA trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check DGICA's competition here
SAFT vs ACIC Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 581.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while ACIC trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ACIC's competition here
SAFT vs GBLI Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 389.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while GBLI trades at $27.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check GBLI's competition here
SAFT vs AII Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 384M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while AII trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AII's competition here
SAFT vs UIHC Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check UIHC's competition here
SAFT vs NODK Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 271.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while NODK trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -26.48. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check NODK's competition here
SAFT vs KINS Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 254.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while KINS trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check KINS's competition here
SAFT vs PRHIZ Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 209.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while PRHIZ trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PRHIZ's competition here
SAFT vs CNFR Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CNFR's competition here
SAFT vs CNFRZ Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CNFRZ's competition here
SAFT vs PRHI Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while PRHI trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PRHI's competition here
SAFT vs UNAM Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check UNAM's competition here
SAFT vs HALL Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 127.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while HALL trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HALL's competition here
SAFT vs ARGO-PA Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
SAFT vs NSEC Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check NSEC's competition here
SAFT vs FNHC Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check FNHC's competition here
SAFT vs Y Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check Y's competition here
SAFT vs STFC Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check STFC's competition here
SAFT vs AFSI Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFSI's competition here
SAFT vs AHL-PC Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AHL-PC's competition here
SAFT vs GBLIL Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check GBLIL's competition here
SAFT vs CNFRL Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CNFRL's competition here
SAFT vs ENH Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ENH's competition here
SAFT vs MILE Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MILE's competition here
SAFT vs MILEW Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MILEW's competition here
SAFT vs AFHBL Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFHBL's competition here
SAFT vs GFZ Comparison April 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $76.70, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check GFZ's competition here