The Allstate Corporation (ALL-PB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ALL-PB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALL-PB | $25.51 | +0.06% | 53.1B | 0.54 | $46.89 | +1.66% |
| CB | $355.81 | -1.48% | 138.2B | 12.74 | $27.97 | +1.09% |
| PGR | $231.34 | -0.38% | 135.3B | 12.48 | $18.56 | +5.99% |
| TRV | $339.21 | -0.91% | 72.1B | 10.13 | $33.49 | +1.33% |
| ALL-PI | $18.59 | +0.00% | 64.5B | 0.40 | $46.89 | +1.66% |
| ALL-PJ | $26.06 | +0.35% | 64.1B | 0.56 | $46.89 | +1.66% |
| ALL | $248.55 | -0.71% | 64B | 5.91 | $42.07 | +1.66% |
| ALL-PH | $20.00 | +0.20% | 49.8B | 0.43 | $46.89 | +1.66% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.66% |
| CINF | $189.48 | -1.33% | 29.3B | 18.42 | $10.29 | +1.89% |
Stock Comparison
ALL-PB vs CB Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 138.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while CB trades at $355.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check CB's competition here
ALL-PB vs PGR Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 135.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while PGR trades at $231.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check PGR's competition here
ALL-PB vs TRV Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while TRV trades at $339.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check TRV's competition here
ALL-PB vs ALL-PI Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while ALL-PI trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check ALL-PI's competition here
ALL-PB vs ALL-PJ Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB and ALL-PJ have similar daily volatility (0.35).Check ALL-PJ's competition here
ALL-PB vs ALL Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while ALL trades at $248.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check ALL's competition here
ALL-PB vs ALL-PH Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while ALL-PH trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check ALL-PH's competition here
ALL-PB vs ALL-PG Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check ALL-PG's competition here
ALL-PB vs CINF Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while CINF trades at $189.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check CINF's competition here
ALL-PB vs WRB-PG Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while WRB-PG trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check WRB-PG's competition here
ALL-PB vs WRB-PE Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while WRB-PE trades at $21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check WRB-PE's competition here
ALL-PB vs WRB-PF Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while WRB-PF trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check WRB-PF's competition here
ALL-PB vs WRB Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while WRB trades at $70.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check WRB's competition here
ALL-PB vs WRB-PH Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while WRB-PH trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check WRB-PH's competition here
ALL-PB vs MKL Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while MKL trades at $1,971.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check MKL's competition here
ALL-PB vs L Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while L trades at $116.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas L's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check L's competition here
ALL-PB vs HIG-PG Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while HIG-PG trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check HIG-PG's competition here
ALL-PB vs CNA Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while CNA trades at $51.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check CNA's competition here
ALL-PB vs ERIE Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while ERIE trades at $257.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check ERIE's competition here
ALL-PB vs AFG Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while AFG trades at $141.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check AFG's competition here
ALL-PB vs KNSL Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while KNSL trades at $348.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check KNSL's competition here
ALL-PB vs THG Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while THG trades at $220.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check THG's competition here
ALL-PB vs ACT Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while ACT trades at $45.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check ACT's competition here
ALL-PB vs MCY Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while MCY trades at $110.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check MCY's competition here
ALL-PB vs LMND Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while LMND trades at $78.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -42.04. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check LMND's competition here
ALL-PB vs SIGIP Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while SIGIP trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check SIGIP's competition here
ALL-PB vs SIGI Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while SIGI trades at $98.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check SIGI's competition here
ALL-PB vs RLI Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while RLI trades at $61.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check RLI's competition here
ALL-PB vs HGTY Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while HGTY trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 40.80. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check HGTY's competition here
ALL-PB vs PLMR Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while PLMR trades at $142.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check PLMR's competition here
ALL-PB vs HGTY-WT Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
ALL-PB vs AHL Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check AHL's competition here
ALL-PB vs ARX Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, ARX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while ARX trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ARX's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ARX's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to ARX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check ARX's competition here
ALL-PB vs SKWD Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while SKWD trades at $60.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check SKWD's competition here
ALL-PB vs SLDE Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while SLDE trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check SLDE's competition here
ALL-PB vs HCI Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while HCI trades at $181.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check HCI's competition here
ALL-PB vs HMN Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while HMN trades at $54.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check HMN's competition here
ALL-PB vs STC Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while STC trades at $68.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check STC's competition here
ALL-PB vs KMPB Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while KMPB trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check KMPB's competition here
ALL-PB vs KMPR Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while KMPR trades at $28.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check KMPR's competition here
ALL-PB vs AFGB Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while AFGB trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check AFGB's competition here
ALL-PB vs AFGD Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while AFGD trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check AFGD's competition here
ALL-PB vs AFGC Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while AFGC trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is 1.66. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check AFGC's competition here
ALL-PB vs UFCS Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while UFCS trades at $52.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check UFCS's competition here
ALL-PB vs AFGE Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while AFGE trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check AFGE's competition here
ALL-PB vs PRA Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while PRA trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check PRA's competition here
ALL-PB vs ASIC Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while ASIC trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check ASIC's competition here
ALL-PB vs UVE Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while UVE trades at $42.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check UVE's competition here
ALL-PB vs SAFT Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while SAFT trades at $77.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check SAFT's competition here
ALL-PB vs ARGO Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check ARGO's competition here
ALL-PB vs BOW Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while BOW trades at $31.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check BOW's competition here
ALL-PB vs MHLA Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 965M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while MHLA trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is 118.31. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check MHLA's competition here
ALL-PB vs ROOT Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 897.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while ROOT trades at $63.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check ROOT's competition here
ALL-PB vs HRTG Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 830.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while HRTG trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check HRTG's competition here
ALL-PB vs DGICA Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 698.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while DGICA trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check DGICA's competition here
ALL-PB vs DGICB Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while DGICB trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check DGICB's competition here
ALL-PB vs ACIC Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 550.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while ACIC trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check ACIC's competition here
ALL-PB vs AII Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 368M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while AII trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check AII's competition here
ALL-PB vs GBLI Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 357.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while GBLI trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check GBLI's competition here
ALL-PB vs UIHC Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check UIHC's competition here
ALL-PB vs NODK Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 323M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while NODK trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -78.85. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check NODK's competition here
ALL-PB vs KINS Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while KINS trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check KINS's competition here
ALL-PB vs PRHIZ Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 243.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while PRHIZ trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check PRHIZ's competition here
ALL-PB vs YSXT Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while YSXT trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check YSXT's competition here
ALL-PB vs CNFR Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check CNFR's competition here
ALL-PB vs CNFRZ Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check CNFRZ's competition here
ALL-PB vs PRHI Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while PRHI trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check PRHI's competition here
ALL-PB vs UNAM Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check UNAM's competition here
ALL-PB vs ARGO-PA Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
ALL-PB vs GBLIL Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check GBLIL's competition here
ALL-PB vs AHL-PC Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check AHL-PC's competition here
ALL-PB vs MILEW Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check MILEW's competition here
ALL-PB vs MILE Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check MILE's competition here
ALL-PB vs NSEC Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check NSEC's competition here
ALL-PB vs STFC Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB and STFC have similar daily volatility (0.35).Check STFC's competition here
ALL-PB vs GFZ Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check GFZ's competition here
ALL-PB vs Y Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check Y's competition here
ALL-PB vs AFSI Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check AFSI's competition here
ALL-PB vs CNFRL Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check CNFRL's competition here
ALL-PB vs FNHC Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check FNHC's competition here
ALL-PB vs ENH Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check ENH's competition here
ALL-PB vs AFHBL Comparison July 2026
ALL-PB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PB stands at 53.1B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PB is priced at $25.51, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, ALL-PB's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PB is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PB.Check AFHBL's competition here