ProAssurance Corporation
ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PRA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRA | $24.51 | -0.35% | 1.3B | 19.46 | $1.26 | N/A |
| CB | $324.15 | +1.27% | 125.7B | 11.46 | $28.28 | +1.20% |
| PGR | $199.73 | +1.45% | 116.7B | 10.16 | $19.66 | +6.95% |
| TRV | $299.76 | +0.49% | 63.7B | 8.94 | $33.52 | +1.47% |
| ALL | $217.37 | +0.42% | 56B | 4.81 | $45.20 | +1.88% |
| ALL-PB | $25.80 | -0.35% | 53.8B | 2.15 | $12.04 | +1.88% |
| ALL-PH | $20.27 | -1.24% | 50.5B | 3.33 | $6.10 | +1.88% |
| HIG | $133.92 | -0.25% | 36.7B | 9.43 | $14.20 | +1.67% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.88% |
| CINF | $166.42 | +0.67% | 25.7B | 9.52 | $17.49 | +2.14% |
Stock Comparison
PRA vs CB Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 125.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while CB trades at $324.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check CB's competition here
PRA vs PGR Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 116.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while PGR trades at $199.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check PGR's competition here
PRA vs TRV Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while TRV trades at $299.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check TRV's competition here
PRA vs ALL Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while ALL trades at $217.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check ALL's competition here
PRA vs ALL-PB Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while ALL-PB trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check ALL-PB's competition here
PRA vs ALL-PH Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while ALL-PH trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check ALL-PH's competition here
PRA vs HIG Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while HIG trades at $133.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check HIG's competition here
PRA vs ALL-PG Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check ALL-PG's competition here
PRA vs CINF Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while CINF trades at $166.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check CINF's competition here
PRA vs WRB Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while WRB trades at $66.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check WRB's competition here
PRA vs MKL Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while MKL trades at $1,844.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check MKL's competition here
PRA vs L Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while L trades at $105.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check L's competition here
PRA vs HIG-PG Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while HIG-PG trades at $24.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check HIG-PG's competition here
PRA vs CNA Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while CNA trades at $43.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check CNA's competition here
PRA vs AFG Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while AFG trades at $134.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check AFG's competition here
PRA vs WRB-PE Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while WRB-PE trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check WRB-PE's competition here
PRA vs AXS Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while AXS trades at $99.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check AXS's competition here
PRA vs WRB-PF Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while WRB-PF trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check WRB-PF's competition here
PRA vs KNSL Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while KNSL trades at $311.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check KNSL's competition here
PRA vs AXS-PE Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while AXS-PE trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.71. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check AXS-PE's competition here
PRA vs ALL-PJ Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
PRA vs THG Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while THG trades at $194.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check THG's competition here
PRA vs WRB-PG Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while WRB-PG trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check WRB-PG's competition here
PRA vs WRB-PH Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while WRB-PH trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check WRB-PH's competition here
PRA vs MCY Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while MCY trades at $98.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check MCY's competition here
PRA vs WTM Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while WTM trades at $2,136.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check WTM's competition here
PRA vs SIGI Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while SIGI trades at $88.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check SIGI's competition here
PRA vs ALL-PI Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while ALL-PI trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check ALL-PI's competition here
PRA vs RLI Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while RLI trades at $50.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check RLI's competition here
PRA vs LMND Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while LMND trades at $51.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -27.76. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check LMND's competition here
PRA vs HGTY-WT Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
PRA vs HGTY Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while HGTY trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 43.42. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check HGTY's competition here
PRA vs AHL Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check AHL's competition here
PRA vs PLMR Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while PLMR trades at $110.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check PLMR's competition here
PRA vs AHL-PD Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while AHL-PD trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -86.00. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check AHL-PD's competition here
PRA vs SLDE Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while SLDE trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check SLDE's competition here
PRA vs STC Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while STC trades at $66.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check STC's competition here
PRA vs HCI Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while HCI trades at $156.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check HCI's competition here
PRA vs AHL-PE Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while AHL-PE trades at $20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -84.94. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check AHL-PE's competition here
PRA vs SKWD Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while SKWD trades at $46.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check SKWD's competition here
PRA vs HMN Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while HMN trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check HMN's competition here
PRA vs AFGB Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while AFGB trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check AFGB's competition here
PRA vs KMPR Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while KMPR trades at $29.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 41.24. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check KMPR's competition here
PRA vs AFGD Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while AFGD trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check AFGD's competition here
PRA vs AFGC Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while AFGC trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check AFGC's competition here
PRA vs KMPB Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while KMPB trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check KMPB's competition here
PRA vs AFGE Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while AFGE trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check AFGE's competition here
PRA vs UFCS Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while UFCS trades at $48.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check UFCS's competition here
PRA vs UVE Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while UVE trades at $38.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check UVE's competition here
PRA vs MHLA Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while MHLA trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check MHLA's competition here
PRA vs ARGO Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check ARGO's competition here
PRA vs SAFT Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while SAFT trades at $71.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check SAFT's competition here
PRA vs SIGIP Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 997.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while SIGIP trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check SIGIP's competition here
PRA vs ASIC Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 954.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while ASIC trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check ASIC's competition here
PRA vs BOW Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 928.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while BOW trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check BOW's competition here
PRA vs ROOT Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 776.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while ROOT trades at $55.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check ROOT's competition here
PRA vs HRTG Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 711.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while HRTG trades at $23.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check HRTG's competition here
PRA vs DGICB Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 710.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while DGICB trades at $19.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check DGICB's competition here
PRA vs DGICA Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 626M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while DGICA trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check DGICA's competition here
PRA vs ACIC Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 525.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while ACIC trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check ACIC's competition here
PRA vs GBLI Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 399.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while GBLI trades at $27.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check GBLI's competition here
PRA vs UIHC Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check UIHC's competition here
PRA vs AII Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 333.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while AII trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check AII's competition here
PRA vs NODK Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 282.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while NODK trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -65.71. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check NODK's competition here
PRA vs KINS Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 213.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while KINS trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check KINS's competition here
PRA vs PRHIZ Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 209.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while PRHIZ trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check PRHIZ's competition here
PRA vs CNFR Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check CNFR's competition here
PRA vs CNFRZ Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check CNFRZ's competition here
PRA vs PRHI Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while PRHI trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check PRHI's competition here
PRA vs UNAM Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check UNAM's competition here
PRA vs HALL Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 127.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while HALL trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check HALL's competition here
PRA vs ARGO-PA Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
PRA vs AFSI Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check AFSI's competition here
PRA vs FNHC Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check FNHC's competition here
PRA vs MILE Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check MILE's competition here
PRA vs AHL-PC Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check AHL-PC's competition here
PRA vs GBLIL Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check GBLIL's competition here
PRA vs Y Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check Y's competition here
PRA vs NSEC Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check NSEC's competition here
PRA vs STFC Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check STFC's competition here
PRA vs AFHBL Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check AFHBL's competition here
PRA vs CNFRL Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check CNFRL's competition here
PRA vs ENH Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check ENH's competition here
PRA vs MILEW Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check MILEW's competition here
PRA vs GFZ Comparison May 2026
PRA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRA is priced at $24.51, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRA is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRA.Check GFZ's competition here