W.R. Berkley Corporation 4.125% (WRB-PH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WRB-PH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRB-PH | $15.19 | +0.33% | 26.1B | 3.23 | $4.71 | +2.59% |
| CB | $355.81 | -1.48% | 138.2B | 12.74 | $27.97 | +1.09% |
| PGR | $231.34 | -0.38% | 135.3B | 12.48 | $18.56 | +5.99% |
| TRV | $339.21 | -0.91% | 72.1B | 10.13 | $33.49 | +1.33% |
| ALL-PI | $18.59 | +0.00% | 64.5B | 0.40 | $46.89 | +1.66% |
| ALL-PJ | $26.06 | +0.35% | 64.1B | 0.56 | $46.89 | +1.66% |
| ALL | $248.55 | -0.71% | 64B | 5.91 | $42.07 | +1.66% |
| ALL-PB | $25.51 | +0.06% | 53.1B | 0.54 | $46.89 | +1.66% |
| ALL-PH | $20.00 | +0.20% | 49.8B | 0.43 | $46.89 | +1.66% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.66% |
Stock Comparison
WRB-PH vs CB Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 138.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while CB trades at $355.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check CB's competition here
WRB-PH vs PGR Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 135.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while PGR trades at $231.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check PGR's competition here
WRB-PH vs TRV Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while TRV trades at $339.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check TRV's competition here
WRB-PH vs ALL-PI Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while ALL-PI trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check ALL-PI's competition here
WRB-PH vs ALL-PJ Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
WRB-PH vs ALL Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while ALL trades at $248.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check ALL's competition here
WRB-PH vs ALL-PB Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while ALL-PB trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check ALL-PB's competition here
WRB-PH vs ALL-PH Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while ALL-PH trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check ALL-PH's competition here
WRB-PH vs ALL-PG Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check ALL-PG's competition here
WRB-PH vs CINF Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while CINF trades at $189.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check CINF's competition here
WRB-PH vs WRB-PG Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while WRB-PG trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check WRB-PG's competition here
WRB-PH vs WRB-PE Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while WRB-PE trades at $21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check WRB-PE's competition here
WRB-PH vs WRB-PF Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while WRB-PF trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check WRB-PF's competition here
WRB-PH vs WRB Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while WRB trades at $70.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check WRB's competition here
WRB-PH vs MKL Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while MKL trades at $1,971.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check MKL's competition here
WRB-PH vs L Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while L trades at $116.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas L's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check L's competition here
WRB-PH vs HIG-PG Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while HIG-PG trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check HIG-PG's competition here
WRB-PH vs CNA Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while CNA trades at $51.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check CNA's competition here
WRB-PH vs ERIE Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while ERIE trades at $257.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check ERIE's competition here
WRB-PH vs AFG Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while AFG trades at $141.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check AFG's competition here
WRB-PH vs KNSL Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while KNSL trades at $348.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check KNSL's competition here
WRB-PH vs THG Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while THG trades at $220.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check THG's competition here
WRB-PH vs ACT Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while ACT trades at $45.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check ACT's competition here
WRB-PH vs MCY Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while MCY trades at $110.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check MCY's competition here
WRB-PH vs LMND Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while LMND trades at $78.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -42.04. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check LMND's competition here
WRB-PH vs SIGIP Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while SIGIP trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check SIGIP's competition here
WRB-PH vs SIGI Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while SIGI trades at $98.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check SIGI's competition here
WRB-PH vs RLI Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while RLI trades at $61.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check RLI's competition here
WRB-PH vs HGTY Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while HGTY trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 40.80. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check HGTY's competition here
WRB-PH vs PLMR Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while PLMR trades at $142.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check PLMR's competition here
WRB-PH vs HGTY-WT Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
WRB-PH vs AHL Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check AHL's competition here
WRB-PH vs ARX Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ARX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while ARX trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ARX's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARX's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to ARX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check ARX's competition here
WRB-PH vs SKWD Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while SKWD trades at $60.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check SKWD's competition here
WRB-PH vs SLDE Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while SLDE trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check SLDE's competition here
WRB-PH vs HCI Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while HCI trades at $181.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check HCI's competition here
WRB-PH vs HMN Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while HMN trades at $54.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check HMN's competition here
WRB-PH vs STC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while STC trades at $68.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check STC's competition here
WRB-PH vs KMPB Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while KMPB trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check KMPB's competition here
WRB-PH vs KMPR Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while KMPR trades at $28.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check KMPR's competition here
WRB-PH vs AFGB Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while AFGB trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check AFGB's competition here
WRB-PH vs AFGD Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while AFGD trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check AFGD's competition here
WRB-PH vs AFGC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while AFGC trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is 1.66. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check AFGC's competition here
WRB-PH vs UFCS Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while UFCS trades at $52.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check UFCS's competition here
WRB-PH vs AFGE Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while AFGE trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check AFGE's competition here
WRB-PH vs PRA Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while PRA trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check PRA's competition here
WRB-PH vs ASIC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while ASIC trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check ASIC's competition here
WRB-PH vs UVE Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while UVE trades at $42.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check UVE's competition here
WRB-PH vs SAFT Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while SAFT trades at $77.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check SAFT's competition here
WRB-PH vs ARGO Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check ARGO's competition here
WRB-PH vs BOW Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while BOW trades at $31.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check BOW's competition here
WRB-PH vs MHLA Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 965M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while MHLA trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is 118.31. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check MHLA's competition here
WRB-PH vs ROOT Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 897.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while ROOT trades at $63.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check ROOT's competition here
WRB-PH vs HRTG Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 830.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while HRTG trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check HRTG's competition here
WRB-PH vs DGICA Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 698.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while DGICA trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check DGICA's competition here
WRB-PH vs DGICB Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while DGICB trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check DGICB's competition here
WRB-PH vs ACIC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 550.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while ACIC trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check ACIC's competition here
WRB-PH vs AII Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 368M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while AII trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check AII's competition here
WRB-PH vs GBLI Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 357.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while GBLI trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check GBLI's competition here
WRB-PH vs UIHC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check UIHC's competition here
WRB-PH vs NODK Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 323M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while NODK trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -78.85. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check NODK's competition here
WRB-PH vs KINS Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while KINS trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check KINS's competition here
WRB-PH vs PRHIZ Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 243.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while PRHIZ trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check PRHIZ's competition here
WRB-PH vs YSXT Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while YSXT trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check YSXT's competition here
WRB-PH vs CNFR Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check CNFR's competition here
WRB-PH vs CNFRZ Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check CNFRZ's competition here
WRB-PH vs PRHI Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while PRHI trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check PRHI's competition here
WRB-PH vs UNAM Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check UNAM's competition here
WRB-PH vs ARGO-PA Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
WRB-PH vs GBLIL Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check GBLIL's competition here
WRB-PH vs AHL-PC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check AHL-PC's competition here
WRB-PH vs MILEW Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check MILEW's competition here
WRB-PH vs MILE Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check MILE's competition here
WRB-PH vs NSEC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check NSEC's competition here
WRB-PH vs STFC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check STFC's competition here
WRB-PH vs GFZ Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check GFZ's competition here
WRB-PH vs Y Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check Y's competition here
WRB-PH vs AFSI Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check AFSI's competition here
WRB-PH vs CNFRL Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check CNFRL's competition here
WRB-PH vs FNHC Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check FNHC's competition here
WRB-PH vs ENH Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check ENH's competition here
WRB-PH vs AFHBL Comparison July 2026
WRB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PH stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PH is priced at $15.19, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, WRB-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PH is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PH.Check AFHBL's competition here