Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See KINS's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for KINS and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KINS | $19.91 | +5.46% | 288.4M | 9.01 | $2.21 | +1.01% |
| CB | $359.75 | +1.84% | 139.5B | 12.86 | $27.97 | +1.10% |
| PGR | $213.83 | +3.26% | 124.3B | 11.77 | $18.17 | +6.51% |
| TRV | $387.26 | +2.89% | 80.8B | 11.57 | $33.49 | +1.18% |
| ALL | $259.97 | +2.14% | 66.9B | 6.18 | $42.07 | +1.60% |
| ALL-PI | $18.16 | -0.22% | 65.3B | 0.39 | $46.89 | +1.60% |
| ALL-PJ | $25.87 | +0.04% | 64.9B | 0.55 | $46.89 | +1.60% |
| ALL-PB | $25.54 | -0.08% | 53.2B | 0.54 | $46.89 | +1.60% |
| ALL-PH | $19.31 | -0.46% | 48.1B | 0.41 | $46.89 | +1.60% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.60% |
Stock Comparison
Chubb Limited (NYSE: CB)
KINS vs CB Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 139.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while CB trades at $359.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CB's competition here
The Progressive Corporation (NYSE: PGR)
KINS vs PGR Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 124.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while PGR trades at $213.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PGR's competition here
The Travelers Companies, Inc. (NYSE: TRV)
KINS vs TRV Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 80.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while TRV trades at $387.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check TRV's competition here
The Allstate Corporation (NYSE: ALL)
KINS vs ALL Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while ALL trades at $259.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL's competition here
The Allstate Corporation (NYSE: ALL-PI)
KINS vs ALL-PI Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while ALL-PI trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PI's competition here
The Allstate Corporation (NYSE: ALL-PJ)
KINS vs ALL-PJ Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while ALL-PJ trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
The Allstate Corporation (NYSE: ALL-PB)
KINS vs ALL-PB Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while ALL-PB trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PB's competition here
The Allstate Corporation (NYSE: ALL-PH)
KINS vs ALL-PH Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while ALL-PH trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PH's competition here
The Allstate Corporation (NYSE: ALL-PG)
KINS vs ALL-PG Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PG's competition here
Cincinnati Financial Corporation (NASDAQ: CINF)
KINS vs CINF Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while CINF trades at $182.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CINF's competition here
W. R. Berkley Corporation (NYSE: WRB)
KINS vs WRB Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while WRB trades at $75.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB's competition here
W. R. Berkley Corporation 5.70% SB DB 2058 (NYSE: WRB-PE)
KINS vs WRB-PE Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while WRB-PE trades at $21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PE's competition here
W.R. Berkley Corporation 4.25% (NYSE: WRB-PG)
KINS vs WRB-PG Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while WRB-PG trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PG's competition here
W.R. Berkley Corporation 5.10% (NYSE: WRB-PF)
KINS vs WRB-PF Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while WRB-PF trades at $18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PF's competition here
W.R. Berkley Corporation 4.125% (NYSE: WRB-PH)
KINS vs WRB-PH Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while WRB-PH trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PH's competition here
Markel Corporation (NYSE: MKL)
KINS vs MKL Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while MKL trades at $1,994.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MKL's competition here
Loews Corporation (NYSE: L)
KINS vs L Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, L has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while L trades at $117.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas L's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to L. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check L's competition here
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (NYSE: HIG-PG)
KINS vs HIG-PG Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while HIG-PG trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HIG-PG's competition here
CNA Financial Corporation (NYSE: CNA)
KINS vs CNA Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while CNA trades at $53.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNA's competition here
American Financial Group, Inc. (NYSE: AFG)
KINS vs AFG Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while AFG trades at $143.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFG's competition here
Erie Indemnity Company (NASDAQ: ERIE)
KINS vs ERIE Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while ERIE trades at $223.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ERIE's competition here
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. (NYSE: KNSL)
KINS vs KNSL Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while KNSL trades at $349.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KNSL's competition here
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (NYSE: THG)
KINS vs THG Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while THG trades at $218.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check THG's competition here
Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT)
KINS vs ACT Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while ACT trades at $46.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ACT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ACT's competition here
Mercury General Corporation (NYSE: MCY)
KINS vs MCY Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while MCY trades at $107.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MCY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MCY's competition here
Selective Insurance Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIGI)
KINS vs SIGI Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while SIGI trades at $96.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SIGI's competition here
Selective Insurance Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIGIP)
KINS vs SIGIP Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while SIGIP trades at $15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SIGIP's competition here
RLI Corp. (NYSE: RLI)
KINS vs RLI Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while RLI trades at $61.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to RLI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check RLI's competition here
Lemonade, Inc. (NYSE: LMND)
KINS vs LMND Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while LMND trades at $60.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -32.18. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to LMND. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check LMND's competition here
Hagerty, Inc. (NYSE: HGTY)
KINS vs HGTY Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while HGTY trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 38.97. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HGTY's competition here
Palomar Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: PLMR)
KINS vs PLMR Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while PLMR trades at $137.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PLMR's competition here
Hagerty, Inc. (NYSE: HGTY-WT)
KINS vs HGTY-WT Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited (NYSE: AHL)
KINS vs AHL Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL's competition here
Accelerant Holdings (NYSE: ARX)
KINS vs ARX Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ARX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while ARX trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ARX's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ARX's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ARX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ARX's competition here
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: SKWD)
KINS vs SKWD Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while SKWD trades at $60.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SKWD's competition here
Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: SLDE)
KINS vs SLDE Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while SLDE trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SLDE's competition here
HCI Group, Inc. (NYSE: HCI)
KINS vs HCI Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while HCI trades at $178.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HCI's competition here
Horace Mann Educators Corporation (NYSE: HMN)
KINS vs HMN Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while HMN trades at $52.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HMN's competition here
Stewart Information Services Corporation (NYSE: STC)
KINS vs STC Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while STC trades at $67.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check STC's competition here
American Financial Group, Inc. (NYSE: AFGB)
KINS vs AFGB Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while AFGB trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGB's competition here
Kemper Corporation (NYSE: KMPR)
KINS vs KMPR Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while KMPR trades at $28.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KMPR's competition here
Kemper Corporation 5.875% Fixed (NYSE: KMPB)
KINS vs KMPB Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while KMPB trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KMPB's competition here
American Financial Group, Inc. (NYSE: AFGD)
KINS vs AFGD Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while AFGD trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGD's competition here
Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: SAFT)
KINS vs SAFT Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while SAFT trades at $103.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SAFT's competition here
American Financial Group, Inc. (NYSE: AFGC)
KINS vs AFGC Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while AFGC trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGC's competition here
American Financial Group, Inc. (NYSE: AFGE)
KINS vs AFGE Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while AFGE trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGE's competition here
United Fire Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: UFCS)
KINS vs UFCS Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while UFCS trades at $51.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UFCS's competition here
Porch Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRCH)
KINS vs PRCH Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, PRCH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while PRCH trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas PRCH's P/E ratio is -78.72. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRCH's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PRCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRCH's competition here
ProAssurance Corporation (NYSE: PRA)
KINS vs PRA Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while PRA trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRA's competition here
Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: UVE)
KINS vs UVE Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while UVE trades at $41.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UVE's competition here
Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (NYSE: ASIC)
KINS vs ASIC Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while ASIC trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ASIC's competition here
Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd. (NYSE: ARGO)
KINS vs ARGO Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ARGO's competition here
Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc. (NYSE: BOW)
KINS vs BOW Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while BOW trades at $31.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to BOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check BOW's competition here
Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6.625 NT 2046 (NYSE: MHLA)
KINS vs MHLA Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 894.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while MHLA trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is 109.71. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MHLA's competition here
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HRTG)
KINS vs HRTG Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 845.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while HRTG trades at $27.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HRTG's competition here
Root, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROOT)
KINS vs ROOT Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 812.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while ROOT trades at $57.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ROOT's competition here
Donegal Group Inc. (NASDAQ: DGICA)
KINS vs DGICA Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 675.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while DGICA trades at $18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check DGICA's competition here
Donegal Group Inc. (NASDAQ: DGICB)
KINS vs DGICB Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 594.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while DGICB trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check DGICB's competition here
American Coastal Insurance Corporation (NASDAQ: ACIC)
KINS vs ACIC Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 498.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while ACIC trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ACIC's competition here
Global Indemnity Group, LLC (NASDAQ: GBLI)
KINS vs GBLI Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 396.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while GBLI trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check GBLI's competition here
American Integrity Insurance Group, Inc. (NYSE: AII)
KINS vs AII Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 365.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while AII trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AII's competition here
United Insurance Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: UIHC)
KINS vs UIHC Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UIHC's competition here
NI Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: NODK)
KINS vs NODK Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 324.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while NODK trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -79.25. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to NODK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check NODK's competition here
Presurance Holdings, Inc. 9.75% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2028 (NASDAQ: PRHIZ)
KINS vs PRHIZ Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 244M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while PRHIZ trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRHIZ's competition here
Conifer Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: CNFR)
KINS vs CNFR Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNFR's competition here
Conifer Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: CNFRZ)
KINS vs CNFRZ Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNFRZ's competition here
Presurance Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRHI)
KINS vs PRHI Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while PRHI trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRHI's competition here
Unico American Corporation (NASDAQ: UNAM)
KINS vs UNAM Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UNAM's competition here
Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd. (NYSE: ARGO-PA)
KINS vs ARGO-PA Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
Alleghany Corporation (NYSE: Y)
KINS vs Y Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check Y's competition here
FedNat Holding Company (NASDAQ: FNHC)
KINS vs FNHC Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check FNHC's competition here
State Auto Financial Corporation (NASDAQ: STFC)
KINS vs STFC Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check STFC's competition here
Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: AFHBL)
KINS vs AFHBL Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFHBL's competition here
Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited (NYSE: AHL-PC)
KINS vs AHL-PC Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL-PC's competition here
Conifer Holdings, Inc. - Senior (NASDAQ: CNFRL)
KINS vs CNFRL Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNFRL's competition here
American Financial Group (NYSE: GFZ)
KINS vs GFZ Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check GFZ's competition here
Global Indemnity Limited SUB NT 47 (NASDAQ: GBLIL)
KINS vs GBLIL Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check GBLIL's competition here
The National Security Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: NSEC)
KINS vs NSEC Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check NSEC's competition here
Metromile, Inc. (NASDAQ: MILEW)
KINS vs MILEW Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MILEW's competition here
AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: AFSI)
KINS vs AFSI Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFSI's competition here
Endurance Specialty Holdings Ltd (NYSE: ENH)
KINS vs ENH Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ENH's competition here
Metromile, Inc. (NASDAQ: MILE)
KINS vs MILE Comparison July 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 288.4M. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $19.91 on the NASDAQ, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MILE's competition here