Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KINS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KINS | $20.12 | +2.18% | 291.4M | 9.10 | $2.21 | +0.99% |
| CB | $361.17 | +2.68% | 140.1B | 12.91 | $27.97 | +1.09% |
| PGR | $232.22 | +3.07% | 135.7B | 12.51 | $18.56 | +5.99% |
| TRV | $342.31 | +2.30% | 72.8B | 10.22 | $33.49 | +1.33% |
| ALL | $250.33 | +2.97% | 64.4B | 5.95 | $42.07 | +1.66% |
| ALL-PJ | $25.97 | -0.12% | 64.4B | 0.55 | $46.89 | +1.66% |
| ALL-PI | $18.59 | -0.11% | 64.1B | 0.40 | $46.89 | +1.66% |
| ALL-PB | $25.49 | -0.04% | 53.1B | 0.54 | $46.89 | +1.66% |
| ALL-PH | $19.96 | -0.10% | 49.7B | 0.43 | $46.89 | +1.66% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.66% |
Stock Comparison
KINS vs CB Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 140.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while CB trades at $361.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CB's competition here
KINS vs PGR Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 135.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while PGR trades at $232.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PGR's competition here
KINS vs TRV Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while TRV trades at $342.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check TRV's competition here
KINS vs ALL Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while ALL trades at $250.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PJ Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while ALL-PJ trades at $25.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PI Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while ALL-PI trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PI's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PB Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while ALL-PB trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PB's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PH Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while ALL-PH trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PH's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PG Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PG's competition here
KINS vs CINF Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while CINF trades at $192.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CINF's competition here
KINS vs WRB Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while WRB trades at $72.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB's competition here
KINS vs WRB-PG Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while WRB-PG trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PG's competition here
KINS vs WRB-PE Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while WRB-PE trades at $21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PE's competition here
KINS vs WRB-PF Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while WRB-PF trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PF's competition here
KINS vs WRB-PH Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while WRB-PH trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PH's competition here
KINS vs MKL Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while MKL trades at $1,979.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MKL's competition here
KINS vs L Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, L has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while L trades at $116.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas L's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check L's competition here
KINS vs HIG-PG Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while HIG-PG trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 1.73. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HIG-PG's competition here
KINS vs CNA Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while CNA trades at $51.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNA's competition here
KINS vs ERIE Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while ERIE trades at $259.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ERIE's competition here
KINS vs AFG Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while AFG trades at $142.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFG's competition here
KINS vs KNSL Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while KNSL trades at $354.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KNSL's competition here
KINS vs THG Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while THG trades at $221.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check THG's competition here
KINS vs ACT Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while ACT trades at $45.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ACT's competition here
KINS vs MCY Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while MCY trades at $110.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MCY's competition here
KINS vs SIGI Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while SIGI trades at $100.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SIGI's competition here
KINS vs SIGIP Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while SIGIP trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.13. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SIGIP's competition here
KINS vs RLI Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while RLI trades at $62.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check RLI's competition here
KINS vs LMND Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while LMND trades at $71.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -38.25. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check LMND's competition here
KINS vs HGTY Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while HGTY trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 41.30. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HGTY's competition here
KINS vs PLMR Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while PLMR trades at $140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PLMR's competition here
KINS vs HGTY-WT Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
KINS vs AHL Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL's competition here
KINS vs ARX Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, ARX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while ARX trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ARX's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ARX's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to ARX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ARX's competition here
KINS vs SKWD Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while SKWD trades at $61.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SKWD's competition here
KINS vs SLDE Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while SLDE trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SLDE's competition here
KINS vs HCI Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while HCI trades at $182.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HCI's competition here
KINS vs HMN Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while HMN trades at $53.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HMN's competition here
KINS vs STC Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while STC trades at $67.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check STC's competition here
KINS vs AFGB Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while AFGB trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGB's competition here
KINS vs KMPR Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while KMPR trades at $28.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KMPR's competition here
KINS vs AFGD Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while AFGD trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGD's competition here
KINS vs KMPB Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while KMPB trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KMPB's competition here
KINS vs AFGC Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while AFGC trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is 1.66. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGC's competition here
KINS vs UFCS Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while UFCS trades at $53.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UFCS's competition here
KINS vs AFGE Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while AFGE trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGE's competition here
KINS vs PRA Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while PRA trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRA's competition here
KINS vs ASIC Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while ASIC trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ASIC's competition here
KINS vs UVE Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while UVE trades at $43.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UVE's competition here
KINS vs SAFT Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while SAFT trades at $77.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SAFT's competition here
KINS vs ARGO Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ARGO's competition here
KINS vs BOW Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while BOW trades at $31.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check BOW's competition here
KINS vs MHLA Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 949.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while MHLA trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is 116.40. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MHLA's competition here
KINS vs ROOT Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 865.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while ROOT trades at $61.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ROOT's competition here
KINS vs HRTG Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 823.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while HRTG trades at $27.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HRTG's competition here
KINS vs DGICA Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 706.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while DGICA trades at $19.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check DGICA's competition here
KINS vs DGICB Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 670.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while DGICB trades at $22.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check DGICB's competition here
KINS vs ACIC Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 559.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while ACIC trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ACIC's competition here
KINS vs AII Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 377.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while AII trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AII's competition here
KINS vs GBLI Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 358.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while GBLI trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check GBLI's competition here
KINS vs UIHC Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UIHC's competition here
KINS vs NODK Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while NODK trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -80.45. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check NODK's competition here
KINS vs PRHIZ Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 243.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while PRHIZ trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRHIZ's competition here
KINS vs YSXT Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while YSXT trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check YSXT's competition here
KINS vs CNFR Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNFR's competition here
KINS vs CNFRZ Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNFRZ's competition here
KINS vs PRHI Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while PRHI trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRHI's competition here
KINS vs UNAM Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UNAM's competition here
KINS vs ARGO-PA Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
KINS vs ENH Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ENH's competition here
KINS vs FNHC Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check FNHC's competition here
KINS vs CNFRL Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNFRL's competition here
KINS vs AHL-PC Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL-PC's competition here
KINS vs AFHBL Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFHBL's competition here
KINS vs GBLIL Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check GBLIL's competition here
KINS vs MILEW Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MILEW's competition here
KINS vs MILE Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MILE's competition here
KINS vs NSEC Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check NSEC's competition here
KINS vs STFC Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check STFC's competition here
KINS vs Y Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check Y's competition here
KINS vs AFSI Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFSI's competition here
KINS vs GFZ Comparison July 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 291.4M. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.12, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check GFZ's competition here