W.R. Berkley Corporation 5.10%
W.R. Berkley Corporation 5.10% (WRB-PF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WRB-PF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRB-PF | $19.80 | +0.92% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +2.29% |
| PGR | $250.10 | +1.10% | 146.6B | 14.08 | $17.76 | +1.96% |
| CB | $269.15 | -0.38% | 107.9B | 11.89 | $22.64 | +1.37% |
| TRV | $261.05 | -0.36% | 58.8B | 11.55 | $22.61 | +1.63% |
| ALL-PH | $21.32 | +0.71% | 52.6B | 3.38 | $6.29 | +1.96% |
| ALL-PB | $25.64 | +0.08% | 52.4B | 2.13 | $12.04 | +1.96% |
| ALL | $195.70 | +0.91% | 51.8B | 13.37 | $14.64 | +1.96% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.96% |
| WRB-PG | $16.62 | +0.85% | 26.2B | N/A | N/A | +2.29% |
| WRB | $68.99 | +0.66% | 26.2B | 15.68 | $4.40 | +2.29% |
Stock Comparison
WRB-PF vs PGR Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 146.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while PGR trades at $250.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check PGR's competition here
WRB-PF vs CB Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 107.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while CB trades at $269.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check CB's competition here
WRB-PF vs TRV Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while TRV trades at $261.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check TRV's competition here
WRB-PF vs ALL-PH Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while ALL-PH trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ALL-PH's competition here
WRB-PF vs ALL-PB Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while ALL-PB trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.13. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ALL-PB's competition here
WRB-PF vs ALL Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while ALL trades at $195.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ALL's competition here
WRB-PF vs ALL-PG Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ALL-PG's competition here
WRB-PF vs WRB-PG Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while WRB-PG trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check WRB-PG's competition here
WRB-PF vs WRB Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while WRB trades at $68.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check WRB's competition here
WRB-PF vs WRB-PH Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while WRB-PH trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check WRB-PH's competition here
WRB-PF vs WRB-PE Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while WRB-PE trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check WRB-PE's competition here
WRB-PF vs MKL Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while MKL trades at $2,026.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check MKL's competition here
WRB-PF vs CINF Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while CINF trades at $149.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check CINF's competition here
WRB-PF vs L Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while L trades at $91.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas L's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check L's competition here
WRB-PF vs CNA Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while CNA trades at $44.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check CNA's competition here
WRB-PF vs KNSL Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while KNSL trades at $477.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check KNSL's competition here
WRB-PF vs AFGC Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while AFGC trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AFGC's competition here
WRB-PF vs AFGD Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while AFGD trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AFGD's competition here
WRB-PF vs AFGE Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while AFGE trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AFGE's competition here
WRB-PF vs AFG Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while AFG trades at $126.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AFG's competition here
WRB-PF vs AFGB Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while AFGB trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AFGB's competition here
WRB-PF vs AXS-PE Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while AXS-PE trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AXS-PE's competition here
WRB-PF vs AXS Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while AXS trades at $96.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AXS's competition here
WRB-PF vs ALL-PJ Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
WRB-PF vs RLI Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while RLI trades at $67.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check RLI's competition here
WRB-PF vs THG Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while THG trades at $166.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check THG's competition here
WRB-PF vs ALL-PI Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while ALL-PI trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ALL-PI's competition here
WRB-PF vs SIGI Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while SIGI trades at $77.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check SIGI's competition here
WRB-PF vs WTM Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while WTM trades at $1,789.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 167.62. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check WTM's competition here
WRB-PF vs KMPB Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while KMPB trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check KMPB's competition here
WRB-PF vs KMPR Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while KMPR trades at $60.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check KMPR's competition here
WRB-PF vs MCY Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while MCY trades at $69.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check MCY's competition here
WRB-PF vs HGTY-WT Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
WRB-PF vs PLMR Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while PLMR trades at $132.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check PLMR's competition here
WRB-PF vs AHL Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while AHL trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AHL's competition here
WRB-PF vs LMND Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while LMND trades at $39.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -13.15. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check LMND's competition here
WRB-PF vs AHL-PD Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while AHL-PD trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -82.45. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AHL-PD's competition here
WRB-PF vs SKWD Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while SKWD trades at $51.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check SKWD's competition here
WRB-PF vs ROOT Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while ROOT trades at $123.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ROOT's competition here
WRB-PF vs AHL-PE Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while AHL-PE trades at $20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -82.80. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AHL-PE's competition here
WRB-PF vs STC Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while STC trades at $65.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check STC's competition here
WRB-PF vs HMN Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while HMN trades at $40.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check HMN's competition here
WRB-PF vs HCI Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while HCI trades at $138.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check HCI's competition here
WRB-PF vs MHLA Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while MHLA trades at $14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check MHLA's competition here
WRB-PF vs PRA Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while PRA trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check PRA's competition here
WRB-PF vs BOW Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while BOW trades at $32.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check BOW's competition here
WRB-PF vs ARGO Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ARGO's competition here
WRB-PF vs SAFT Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while SAFT trades at $70.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check SAFT's competition here
WRB-PF vs SIGIP Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while SIGIP trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check SIGIP's competition here
WRB-PF vs HGTY Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 976.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while HGTY trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 51.24. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check HGTY's competition here
WRB-PF vs UFCS Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 684.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while UFCS trades at $26.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check UFCS's competition here
WRB-PF vs UVE Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 645.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while UVE trades at $22.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check UVE's competition here
WRB-PF vs HRTG Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 637.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while HRTG trades at $20.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check HRTG's competition here
WRB-PF vs DGICA Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 617.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while DGICA trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check DGICA's competition here
WRB-PF vs DGICB Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 597.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while DGICB trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check DGICB's competition here
WRB-PF vs ACIC Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 514M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while ACIC trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ACIC's competition here
WRB-PF vs GBLI Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 429.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while GBLI trades at $30.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check GBLI's competition here
WRB-PF vs UIHC Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check UIHC's competition here
WRB-PF vs AII Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 338.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while AII trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AII's competition here
WRB-PF vs NODK Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 273.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while NODK trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 45.55. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check NODK's competition here
WRB-PF vs CNFRZ Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 244.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while CNFRZ trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check CNFRZ's competition here
WRB-PF vs KINS Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 221.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while KINS trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check KINS's competition here
WRB-PF vs CNFR Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while CNFR trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check CNFR's competition here
WRB-PF vs UNAM Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check UNAM's competition here
WRB-PF vs HALL Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 36.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while HALL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check HALL's competition here
WRB-PF vs ARGO-PA Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 328. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.16. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
WRB-PF vs NSEC Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check NSEC's competition here
WRB-PF vs Y Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check Y's competition here
WRB-PF vs MILEW Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check MILEW's competition here
WRB-PF vs FNHC Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check FNHC's competition here
WRB-PF vs STFC Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check STFC's competition here
WRB-PF vs MILE Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check MILE's competition here
WRB-PF vs AHL-PC Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AHL-PC's competition here
WRB-PF vs AFHBL Comparison July 2025
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.80, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.Check AFHBL's competition here