Woori Financial Group Inc.

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 191.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while HDB trades at $73.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check HDB's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 117.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while IBN trades at $32.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check IBN's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while MFG trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check MFG's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while PNC trades at $194.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check PNC's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while USB-PA trades at $824.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 235.61. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check USB-PA's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while USB-PP trades at $23.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check USB-PP's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while USB-PH trades at $20.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check USB-PH's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while USB-PS trades at $19.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check USB-PS's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while USB trades at $46.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check USB's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while ITUB trades at $6.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check ITUB's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while DB trades at $36.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check DB's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while LYG trades at $4.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check LYG's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while TFC trades at $44.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check TFC's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while HBANL trades at $25.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check HBANL's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while BSBR trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check BSBR's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while HBANM trades at $23.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check HBANM's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while BBD trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check BBD's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while KB trades at $81.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check KB's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while MTB trades at $193.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check MTB's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while FITB trades at $43.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check FITB's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while TFC-PO trades at $21.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check TFC-PO's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while KEY-PL trades at $24.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check KEY-PL's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while BBDO trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check BBDO's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while TFC-PI trades at $20.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check TFC-PI's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while HBANP trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check HBANP's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while USB-PR trades at $16.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check USB-PR's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while TFC-PR trades at $19.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check TFC-PR's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while FCNCP trades at $22.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check FCNCP's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while FCNCO trades at $23.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check FCNCO's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while HBAN trades at $16.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check HBAN's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while SHG trades at $49.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check SHG's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while USB-PQ trades at $15.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check USB-PQ's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while FCNCA trades at $1,925.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check FCNCA's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while RF-PF trades at $25.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check RF-PF's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while RF-PC trades at $24.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check RF-PC's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while RF trades at $26.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check RF's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while CFG trades at $49.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check CFG's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while KEY-PJ trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check KEY-PJ's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while BAP trades at $250.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check BAP's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while KEY-PI trades at $24.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check KEY-PI's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while KEY trades at $18.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -225.56. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check KEY's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while KEY-PK trades at $22.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check KEY-PK's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while FITBI trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check FITBI's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while FITBP trades at $24.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check FITBP's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while RF-PE trades at $17.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check RF-PE's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check CFG-PD's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while BCH trades at $28.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check BCH's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while VLYPN trades at $25.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check VLYPN's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while FITBO trades at $20.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check FITBO's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while FHN-PB trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check FHN-PB's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while FHN-PC trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check FHN-PC's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while FHN-PE trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check FHN-PE's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while CFG-PH trades at $26.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check CFG-PH's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while CIB trades at $48.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check CIB's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while BSAC trades at $24.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check BSAC's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while FHN trades at $22.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check FHN's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while CUBI-PE trades at $350.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 33.71. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check CUBI-PE's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while SSB trades at $97.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check SSB's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while WBS trades at $58.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check WBS's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while FHN-PF trades at $18.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check FHN-PF's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while WAL trades at $83.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check WAL's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check FHN-PD's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while UMBF trades at $117.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check UMBF's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while CMA trades at $69.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check CMA's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while CFG-PE trades at $19.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check CFG-PE's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while WTFC trades at $127.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check WTFC's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while ONB trades at $21.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check ONB's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while ONBPP trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check ONBPP's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while ONBPO trades at $25.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check ONBPO's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while CBSH trades at $61.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check CBSH's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while CFR trades at $126.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check CFR's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while BPOP trades at $119.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check BPOP's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while ZION trades at $53.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check ZION's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while GGAL trades at $49.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check GGAL's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while BSMX trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check BSMX's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while PNFP trades at $93.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check PNFP's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while SNV trades at $49.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check SNV's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while SNV-PD trades at $25.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check SNV-PD's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while BOKF trades at $106.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check BOKF's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while CADE trades at $36.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check CADE's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while PB trades at $68.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check PB's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while FNB trades at $15.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check FNB's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while OZK trades at $50.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check OZK's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while HOMB trades at $28.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check HOMB's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while VLY trades at $10.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check VLY's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while VLYPP trades at $25.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check VLYPP's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while VLYPO trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check VLYPO's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while COLB trades at $26.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check COLB's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while GBCI trades at $46.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check GBCI's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while BXS trades at $28.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check BXS's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while UBSI trades at $37.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check UBSI's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while HWCPZ trades at $24.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check HWCPZ's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while HWC trades at $61.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check HWC's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while FFIN trades at $36.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check FFIN's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while AX trades at $89.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check AX's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while FLG trades at $11.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -8.18. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check FLG's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while ABCB trades at $71.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check ABCB's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, NYCB-PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while NYCB-PA trades at $21.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas NYCB-PA's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYCB-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to NYCB-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check NYCB-PA's competition here

WF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WF is priced at $55.08, while AUB trades at $34.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.91, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, WF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WF is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WF.Check AUB's competition here