U.S. Bancorp
U.S. Bancorp USB Peers
See (USB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USB | $46.16 | +0.83% | 71.9B | 11.04 | $4.18 | +4.33% |
| HDB | $78.17 | -0.37% | 199.7B | 25.46 | $3.07 | +1.60% |
| IBN | $34.09 | -0.38% | 121.7B | 20.54 | $1.66 | +0.70% |
| PNC | $196.78 | +0.38% | 77.8B | 13.46 | $14.62 | +3.30% |
| MFG | $5.73 | +1.69% | 72.7B | 11.94 | $0.48 | +2.35% |
| USB-PA | $830.50 | +0.85% | 71.8B | 236.61 | $3.51 | +4.33% |
| USB-PP | $22.55 | +0.00% | 71.4B | 4.86 | $4.64 | +4.33% |
| USB-PS | $18.57 | -0.43% | 71.1B | N/A | N/A | +4.33% |
| USB-PH | $20.85 | -0.52% | 70.8B | 4.49 | $4.64 | +4.33% |
| ITUB | $6.31 | -1.25% | 63.7B | 9.02 | $0.70 | +6.59% |
Stock Comparison
USB vs HDB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 199.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while HDB trades at $78.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs IBN Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 121.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while IBN trades at $34.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs PNC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while PNC trades at $196.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB and PNC have similar daily volatility (1.73).
USB vs MFG Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while MFG trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PA Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while USB-PA trades at $830.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 236.61. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while USB-PP trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PS Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while USB-PS trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PH Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while USB-PH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ITUB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while ITUB trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs LYG Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while LYG trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs TFC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while TFC trades at $45.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs DB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while DB trades at $30.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HBANL Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while HBANL trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BSBR Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while BSBR trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HBANM Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while HBANM trades at $22.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs MTB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while MTB trades at $196.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while KB trades at $82.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FITB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while FITB trades at $42.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs TFC-PO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while TFC-PO trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FCNCA Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while FCNCA trades at $2,134.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FCNCP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while FCNCP trades at $20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FCNCO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while FCNCO trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BBD Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while BBD trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BBDO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while BBDO trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs TFC-PI Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while TFC-PI trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HBANP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while HBANP trades at $17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs TFC-PR Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while TFC-PR trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PR Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while USB-PR trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HBAN Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while HBAN trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs SHG Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while SHG trades at $49.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PQ Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while USB-PQ trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs RF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while RF trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs RF-PC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while RF-PC trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs RF-PF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while RF-PF trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CFG Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while CFG trades at $49.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KEY Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while KEY trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -98.61. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KEY-PI Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while KEY-PI trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KEY-PL Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while KEY-PL trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KEY-PK Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while KEY-PK trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KEY-PJ Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BAP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while BAP trades at $230.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FITBI Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while FITBI trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FITBP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while FITBP trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs RF-PE Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while RF-PE trades at $17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CFG-PD Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BCH Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while BCH trades at $28.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs VLYPN Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while VLYPN trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs WF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while WF trades at $54.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FITBO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while FITBO trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN-PC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while FHN-PC trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN-PB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while FHN-PB trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN-PE Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while FHN-PE trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CFG-PH Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while CFG-PH trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CIB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while CIB trades at $44.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while FHN trades at $22.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BSAC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while BSAC trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs WBS Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while WBS trades at $61.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CUBI-PE Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while CUBI-PE trades at $324.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs SSB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while SSB trades at $98.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN-PF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while FHN-PF trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs WTFC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while WTFC trades at $135.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs WAL Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while WAL trades at $82.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN-PD Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CFR Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while CFR trades at $137.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs PNFP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while PNFP trades at $111.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CMA Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while CMA trades at $65.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CBSH Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while CBSH trades at $64.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CFG-PE Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while CFG-PE trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ZION Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while ZION trades at $56.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ONBPO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while ONBPO trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ONBPP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while ONBPP trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs SNV Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while SNV trades at $59.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ONB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while ONB trades at $22.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs UMBF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while UMBF trades at $108.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BPOP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while BPOP trades at $115.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs GGAL Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while GGAL trades at $47.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs SNV-PD Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while SNV-PD trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BSMX Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs PB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while PB trades at $72.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BOKF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while BOKF trades at $105.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CADE Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while CADE trades at $35.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs OZK Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while OZK trades at $52.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HOMB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while HOMB trades at $29.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FNB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while FNB trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs VLY Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while VLY trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs VLYPP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while VLYPP trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs VLYPO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while VLYPO trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FFIN Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while FFIN trades at $37.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs UBSI Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while UBSI trades at $37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BXS Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HWC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while HWC trades at $60.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs GBCI Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while GBCI trades at $45.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HWCPZ Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while HWCPZ trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs COLB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while COLB trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FLG Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while FLG trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs AX Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while AX trades at $85.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs AUBAP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, AUBAP has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while AUBAP trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas AUBAP's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUBAP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to AUBAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs AUB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while AUB trades at $33.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ABCB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 71.9B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $46.16, while ABCB trades at $66.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.04, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.