U.S. Bancorp

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while USB-PA trades at $786.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 224.50. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check USB-PA's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 169.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while HDB trades at $33.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check HDB's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 115.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while MFG trades at $9.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check MFG's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while IBN trades at $30.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check IBN's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 104.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while ITUB trades at $9.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check ITUB's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while PNC trades at $221.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check PNC's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while LYG trades at $5.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check LYG's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while USB-PP trades at $23.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check USB-PP's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while USB-PS trades at $18.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check USB-PS's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while DB trades at $36.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check DB's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while USB-PH trades at $19.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check USB-PH's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while TFC trades at $50.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check TFC's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while BSBR trades at $6.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BSBR's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while BBD trades at $4.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BBD's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while KB trades at $115.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check KB's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while BBDO trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BBDO's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while HBANL trades at $25.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check HBANL's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while MTB trades at $223.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check MTB's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while FITB trades at $50.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check FITB's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while SHG trades at $70.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check SHG's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while HBANM trades at $23.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check HBANM's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while TFC-PO trades at $22.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check TFC-PO's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while HBAN trades at $17.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check HBAN's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while CFG trades at $62.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check CFG's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while KEY-PL trades at $25.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check KEY-PL's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while BAP trades at $346.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BAP's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while HBANP trades at $17.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check HBANP's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while RF trades at $28.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check RF's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while USB-PR trades at $16.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check USB-PR's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while TFC-PI trades at $19.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check TFC-PI's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while TFC-PR trades at $19.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check TFC-PR's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while FCNCA trades at $1,949.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check FCNCA's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while KEY trades at $20.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check KEY's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while USB-PQ trades at $15.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check USB-PQ's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while RF-PF trades at $25.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check RF-PF's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while KEY-PJ trades at $22.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check KEY-PJ's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while RF-PC trades at $24.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check RF-PC's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while BCH trades at $42.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BCH's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while CIB trades at $81.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check CIB's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while WF trades at $82.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check WF's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while KEY-PI trades at $25.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check KEY-PI's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while KEY-PK trades at $22.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check KEY-PK's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while BSAC trades at $35.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BSAC's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while FITBI trades at $25.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check FITBI's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while FITBP trades at $24.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check FITBP's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while RF-PE trades at $17.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check RF-PE's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check CFG-PD's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while VLYPN trades at $26.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check VLYPN's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while FITBO trades at $19.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check FITBO's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while FHN-PC trades at $25.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check FHN-PC's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check FHN-PB's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while FHN-PE trades at $24.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check FHN-PE's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while CFG-PH trades at $26.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check CFG-PH's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while FHN trades at $24.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check FHN's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while WBS trades at $72.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check WBS's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while CMA trades at $88.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check CMA's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while SSB trades at $100.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check SSB's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while WTFC trades at $149.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check WTFC's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while WAL trades at $88.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check WAL's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while ONB trades at $23.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check ONB's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while BPOP trades at $142.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BPOP's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while UMBF trades at $119.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check UMBF's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while FHN-PF trades at $18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check FHN-PF's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while ZION trades at $59.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check ZION's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while CFR trades at $141.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check CFR's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while ONBPO trades at $25.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check ONBPO's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while ONBPP trades at $25.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check ONBPP's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check FHN-PD's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while CFG-PE trades at $20.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check CFG-PE's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while BOKF trades at $128.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BOKF's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while CBSH trades at $52.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check CBSH's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while GGAL trades at $48.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check GGAL's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while CADE trades at $42.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check CADE's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while CHYM trades at $19.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -7.95. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check CHYM's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while PNFP trades at $95.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check PNFP's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while COLB trades at $30.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check COLB's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while VLY trades at $12.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check VLY's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while BSMX trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BSMX's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while PB trades at $70.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check PB's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while SNV trades at $50.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check SNV's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check SNV-PD's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while FNB trades at $17.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check FNB's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while GBCI trades at $48.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check GBCI's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check CUBI-PE's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while UBSI trades at $42.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check UBSI's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while CBC trades at $24.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check CBC's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while HWC trades at $67.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check HWC's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while BMA trades at $88.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 35.86. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BMA's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while FLG trades at $13.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -27.90. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check FLG's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while AUB trades at $38.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check AUB's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while HOMB trades at $28.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check HOMB's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while ABCB trades at $79.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check ABCB's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while IFS trades at $50.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check IFS's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while OZK trades at $48.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check OZK's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while AX trades at $90.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check AX's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while VLYPP trades at $25.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check VLYPP's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while VLYPO trades at $25.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check VLYPO's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while AVAL trades at $4.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check AVAL's competition here

USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 91.2B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.90, while BXS trades at $28.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

USB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BXS's competition here