U.S. Bancorp
U.S. Bancorp USB Peers
See (USB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USB | $45.25 | -1.11% | 70.5B | 11.20 | $4.04 | +4.41% |
| HDB | $76.67 | -0.47% | 195.9B | 23.96 | $3.20 | +0.86% |
| PNC | $186.42 | +0.36% | 73.7B | 13.18 | $14.14 | +3.43% |
| USB-PA | $824.20 | -1.91% | 70.4B | 236.44 | $3.51 | +4.41% |
| USB-PS | $18.31 | +0.06% | 70.3B | N/A | N/A | +4.41% |
| USB-PP | $22.14 | -1.91% | 70.2B | 4.79 | $4.64 | +4.41% |
| USB-PH | $20.08 | -1.06% | 70B | 4.31 | $4.64 | +4.41% |
| MFG | $5.56 | +0.00% | 69.6B | 11.56 | $0.48 | +2.42% |
| ITUB | $6.79 | +2.57% | 69.6B | 9.56 | $0.71 | +6.12% |
| LYG | $4.25 | +0.47% | 63.6B | 12.85 | $0.33 | +3.73% |
Stock Comparison
USB vs HDB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 195.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while HDB trades at $76.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs PNC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 73.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while PNC trades at $186.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PA Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while USB-PA trades at $824.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 236.44. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PS Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while USB-PS trades at $18.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while USB-PP trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PH Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while USB-PH trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs MFG Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while MFG trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ITUB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while ITUB trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs LYG Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while LYG trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs IBN Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while IBN trades at $33.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs DB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while DB trades at $29.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs TFC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while TFC trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is -226.21. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BSBR Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while BSBR trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HBANL Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while HBANL trades at $24.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HBANM Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while HBANM trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BBDO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while BBDO trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs MTB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while MTB trades at $193.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BBD Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while BBD trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while KB trades at $82.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs TFC-PO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while TFC-PO trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FITB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while FITB trades at $41.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs TFC-PI Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while TFC-PI trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FCNCP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while FCNCP trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FCNCA Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while FCNCA trades at $1,956.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HBANP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while HBANP trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PR Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while USB-PR trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs TFC-PR Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while TFC-PR trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FCNCO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while FCNCO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HBAN Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while HBAN trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PQ Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while USB-PQ trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs RF-PF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while RF-PF trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs SHG Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while SHG trades at $45.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs RF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while RF trades at $23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs RF-PC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while RF-PC trades at $23.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CFG Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while CFG trades at $44.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KEY Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while KEY trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -91.68. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KEY-PK Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while KEY-PK trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KEY-PJ Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KEY-PI Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while KEY-PI trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KEY-PL Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while KEY-PL trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BAP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while BAP trades at $223.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FITBI Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while FITBI trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FITBP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while FITBP trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs RF-PE Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while RF-PE trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BCH Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while BCH trades at $30.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CFG-PD Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs VLYPN Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while VLYPN trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FITBO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while FITBO trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN-PB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while FHN-PB trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN-PC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while FHN-PC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs WF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while WF trades at $49.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CFG-PH Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while CFG-PH trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN-PE Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while FHN-PE trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CIB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while CIB trades at $46.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BSAC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while BSAC trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while FHN trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs SSB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while SSB trades at $92.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs WBS Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while WBS trades at $54.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CUBI-PE Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while CUBI-PE trades at $286.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN-PD Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN-PF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while FHN-PF trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB and FHN-PF have similar daily volatility (1.22).
USB vs WAL Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while WAL trades at $77.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs PNFP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while PNFP trades at $110.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs WTFC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while WTFC trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CBSH Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while CBSH trades at $62.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CFR Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while CFR trades at $128.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CFG-PE Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while CFG-PE trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs WTFCM Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, WTFCM has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while WTFCM trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas WTFCM's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTFCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WTFCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs UMBF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while UMBF trades at $105.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ONB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while ONB trades at $21.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CMA Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while CMA trades at $59.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ZION Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while ZION trades at $51.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ONBPO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while ONBPO trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.81. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BPOP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while BPOP trades at $110.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ONBPP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while ONBPP trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BSMX Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs SNV Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while SNV trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs SNV-PD Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while SNV-PD trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs PB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while PB trades at $70.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs GGAL Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while GGAL trades at $50.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BOKF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while BOKF trades at $97.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CADE Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while CADE trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HOMB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while HOMB trades at $28.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs OZK Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while OZK trades at $47.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FNB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while FNB trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BXS Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs UBSI Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while UBSI trades at $36.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FFIN Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while FFIN trades at $35.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs VLY Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while VLY trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HWC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while HWC trades at $57.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs COLB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while COLB trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs GBCI Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while GBCI trades at $43.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs VLYPP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while VLYPP trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs VLYPO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while VLYPO trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HWCPZ Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while HWCPZ trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BMA Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while BMA trades at $70.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is -81.60. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ABCB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while ABCB trades at $64.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs AUB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while AUB trades at $31.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FLG Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 70.5B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $45.25, while FLG trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.20, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.