U.S. Bancorp
U.S. Bancorp USB Peers
See (USB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USB | $44.35 | +0.77% | 69.10B | 10.98 | $4.04 | +4.48% |
| HDB | $72.37 | -0.21% | 184.68B | 22.00 | $3.29 | +0.82% |
| PNC | $177.54 | +1.45% | 70.23B | 12.55 | $14.15 | +3.60% |
| USB-PS | $18.70 | +0.27% | 69.38B | N/A | N/A | +4.48% |
| USB-PP | $22.64 | -0.25% | 68.58B | 4.88 | $4.64 | +4.48% |
| USB-PH | $20.73 | -0.33% | 68.31B | 4.47 | $4.64 | +4.48% |
| USB-PA | $841.50 | -0.54% | 68.20B | 239.74 | $3.51 | +4.48% |
| ITUB | $6.63 | +2.79% | 67.33B | 9.90 | $0.67 | +7.26% |
| MFG | $5.17 | +0.10% | 64.81B | 10.54 | $0.49 | +1.24% |
| IBN | $33.51 | -0.21% | 59.72B | 19.83 | $1.69 | +0.71% |
Stock Comparison
USB vs HDB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 184.68B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while HDB trades at $72.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs PNC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 70.23B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while PNC trades at $177.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PS Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 69.38B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while USB-PS trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 68.58B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while USB-PP trades at $22.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PH Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 68.31B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while USB-PH trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PA Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 68.20B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while USB-PA trades at $841.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 239.74. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ITUB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 67.33B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while ITUB trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs MFG Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 64.81B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while MFG trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs IBN Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 59.72B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while IBN trades at $33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs LYG Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 58.67B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while LYG trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs TFC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 54.12B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while TFC trades at $41.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is -217.53. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs DB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 53.42B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while DB trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BSBR Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 40.47B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while BSBR trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HBANL Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 36.83B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while HBANL trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HBANM Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 33.08B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while HBANM trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs TFC-PI Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 31.11B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while TFC-PI trades at $23.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs MTB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 29.94B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while MTB trades at $186.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BBD Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 28.20B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while BBD trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs TFC-PO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.44B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while TFC-PO trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BBDO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 26.82B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while BBDO trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FITB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 26.32B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while FITB trades at $39.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FCNCA Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 26.17B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while FCNCA trades at $1,955.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FCNCP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 26.09B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while FCNCP trades at $21.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HBANP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.08B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while HBANP trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PR Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.58B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while USB-PR trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 25.05B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while KB trades at $66.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FCNCO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 24.84B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while FCNCO trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs TFC-PR Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.69B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while TFC-PR trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs USB-PQ Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.96B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while USB-PQ trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HBAN Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 23.44B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while HBAN trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs RF-PF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.67B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while RF-PF trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs RF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 20.18B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while RF trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs RF-PC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 19.24B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while RF-PC trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KEY Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 18.21B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while KEY trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -87.45. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CFG Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 18.16B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while CFG trades at $41.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KEY-PI Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 18.09B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while KEY-PI trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KEY-PL Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 18.06B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while KEY-PL trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KEY-PK Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 18.04B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while KEY-PK trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs KEY-PJ Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 17.81B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FITBI Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.94B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while FITBI trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BAP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 16.40B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while BAP trades at $206.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FITBP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.26B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while FITBP trades at $24.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs SHG Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 15.84B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while SHG trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs RF-PE Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.75B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while RF-PE trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BCH Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 15.54B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while BCH trades at $30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CFG-PD Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.91B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FITBO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 14.40B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while FITBO trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN-PB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.87B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while FHN-PB trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN-PC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.67B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while FHN-PC trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CFG-PH Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.21B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while CFG-PH trades at $26.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN-PE Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 11.93B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while FHN-PE trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CIB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 10.75B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while CIB trades at $41.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 10.24B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while FHN trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs GGAL Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 10.16B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while GGAL trades at $62.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs WF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while WF trades at $37.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs SSB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.29B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while SSB trades at $91.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs WBS Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 8.90B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while WBS trades at $52.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN-PD Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.89B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FHN-PF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.86B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while FHN-PF trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs WAL Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.79B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while WAL trades at $79.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CBSH Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while CBSH trades at $65.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs PNFP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 8.65B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while PNFP trades at $111.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CFR Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.39B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while CFR trades at $130.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CFG-PE Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.38B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while CFG-PE trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ONB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 8.30B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while ONB trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ONBPO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 8.20B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while ONBPO trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs UMBF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.20B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while UMBF trades at $107.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs WTFC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while WTFC trades at $122.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ONBPP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 7.98B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while ONBPP trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs WTFCM Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, WTFCM has a market cap of 7.77B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while WTFCM trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas WTFCM's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTFCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WTFCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CMA Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 7.70B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while CMA trades at $58.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BSMX Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ZION Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 7.37B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while ZION trades at $49.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BPOP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while BPOP trades at $104.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs PB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.99B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while PB trades at $73.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs SNV Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.89B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while SNV trades at $49.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs SNV-PD Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while SNV-PD trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BOKF Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while BOKF trades at $98.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs CADE Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 5.88B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while CADE trades at $32.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BMA Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 5.85B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while BMA trades at $92.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HOMB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.85B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while HOMB trades at $29.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs COLB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while COLB trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs OZK Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while OZK trades at $46.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs UBSI Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.29B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while UBSI trades at $37.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BXS Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FNB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.22B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while FNB trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FLG Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while FLG trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs VLY Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while VLY trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs FFIN Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5.14B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while FFIN trades at $35.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs GBCI Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5.00B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while GBCI trades at $44.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HWC Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.00B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while HWC trades at $58.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs VLYPP Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while VLYPP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs VLYPO Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while VLYPO trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs HWCPZ Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 4.76B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while HWCPZ trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs BBAR Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, BBAR has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while BBAR trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas BBAR's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to BBAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs AUB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while AUB trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs NYCB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, NYCB has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while NYCB trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas NYCB's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NYCB's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to NYCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs ABCB Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while ABCB trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.
USB vs SFBS Comparison
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 69.10B. In comparison, SFBS has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $44.35, while SFBS trades at $78.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas SFBS's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFBS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to SFBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.