United Parcel Service, Inc.
United Parcel Service, Inc. UPS Peers
See (UPS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPS | $98.21 | +1.38% | 83.2B | 14.59 | $6.73 | +6.66% |
| FDX | $219.65 | +1.35% | 52.6B | 13.82 | $15.89 | +2.51% |
| EXPD | $112.28 | +1.01% | 15.4B | 18.65 | $6.02 | +1.34% |
| XPO | $118.52 | +1.59% | 14B | 36.36 | $3.26 | N/A |
| JBHT | $140.21 | +0.78% | 13.9B | 25.45 | $5.51 | +1.25% |
| ZTO | $17.13 | +0.50% | 13.6B | 10.84 | $1.58 | +4.08% |
| CHRW | $95.80 | +0.30% | 11.4B | 22.86 | $4.19 | +3.23% |
| LSTR | $140.09 | +0.06% | 4.9B | 27.85 | $5.03 | +2.49% |
| GXO | $42.20 | +0.64% | 4.8B | 68.06 | $0.62 | N/A |
| HUBG | $33.69 | +0.93% | 2B | 19.82 | $1.70 | +1.49% |
Stock Comparison
UPS vs FDX Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while FDX trades at $219.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs EXPD Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while EXPD trades at $112.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs XPO Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while XPO trades at $118.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs JBHT Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while JBHT trades at $140.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs ZTO Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while ZTO trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs CHRW Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while CHRW trades at $95.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs LSTR Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while LSTR trades at $140.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs GXO Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while GXO trades at $42.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 68.06. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs HUBG Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while HUBG trades at $33.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs PBI Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while PBI trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PBI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs FWRD Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 568.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while FWRD trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -3.72%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs AIRTP Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 420.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while AIRTP trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 51.99. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs CYRX Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while CYRX trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CYRX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs RLGT Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 277.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while RLGT trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs PAL Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 198.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while PAL trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -91.50. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs CRGO Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 118.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while CRGO trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs SINO Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SINO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs SFWL Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while SFWL trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs FLX Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 71.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while FLX trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs BTOC Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while BTOC trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs AIRT Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while AIRT trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -68.04. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AIRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs NCEW Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while NCEW trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is 124.00. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NCEW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs CJMB Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while CJMB trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs GVH Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while GVH trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is more volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs JYD Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while JYD trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JYD's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs HKPD Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, HKPD has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while HKPD trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas HKPD's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HKPD's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to HKPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs PSIG Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while PSIG trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs CRGOW Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while CRGOW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is more volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs LSH Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while LSH trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LSH's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs ATXG Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while ATXG trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs SGLY Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while SGLY trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs ECHO Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.
UPS vs AIRTW Comparison
UPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPS stands at 83.2B. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UPS is priced at $98.21, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, UPS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UPS is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPS.