Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 85.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while UPS trades at $100.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check UPS's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while FDX trades at $314.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to FDX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check FDX's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while JBHT trades at $274.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 38.92. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check JBHT's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while EXPD trades at $185.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check EXPD's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, FDXF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while FDXF trades at $129.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas FDXF's P/E ratio is 58.33. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FDXF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to FDXF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check FDXF's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while CHRW trades at $150.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check CHRW's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while ZTO trades at $20.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check ZTO's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while GXO trades at $46.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to GXO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check GXO's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while PBI trades at $16.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PBI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is more volatile compared to PBI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check PBI's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while HUBG trades at $36.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check HUBG's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while PBI-PB trades at $21.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check PBI-PB's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 779.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while CYRX trades at $15.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -18.87. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYRX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check CYRX's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 546.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while FWRD trades at $17.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -5.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check FWRD's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 391.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while RLGT trades at $8.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is more volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check RLGT's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 142.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while PAL trades at $5.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check PAL's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while SINO trades at $4.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SINO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check SINO's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while SFWL trades at $11.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 160.54. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check SFWL's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while NCEW trades at $17.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCEW's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check NCEW's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while FLX trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check FLX's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, SLGB has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while SLGB trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas SLGB's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SLGB's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to SLGB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check SLGB's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while LSH trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LSH's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check LSH's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while BTOC trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check BTOC's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while SGLY trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check SGLY's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while CJMB trades at $2.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check CJMB's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, ELOG has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while ELOG trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas ELOG's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELOG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to ELOG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check ELOG's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, HXHX has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while HXHX trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas HXHX's P/E ratio is 1.66. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HXHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to HXHX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check HXHX's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while PSIG trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check PSIG's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while CTNT trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check CTNT's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while ATXG trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check ATXG's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while GVH trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check GVH's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while JYD trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JYD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check JYD's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, CIIT has a market cap of 817.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while CIIT trades at $2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas CIIT's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIIT's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to CIIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check CIIT's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, YGMZ has a market cap of 103.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while YGMZ trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas YGMZ's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YGMZ's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is more volatile compared to YGMZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check YGMZ's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, FRGT has a market cap of 93.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while FRGT trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas FRGT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRGT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to FRGT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check FRGT's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, UTIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while UTIW trades at $7.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas UTIW's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UTIW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is more volatile compared to UTIW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check UTIW's competition here

Landstar System, Inc. (NASDAQ: LSTR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LSTR stands at 6B. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSTR is priced at $177.46 on the NASDAQ, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LSTR currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, LSTR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LSTR is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSTR.Check AIRTW's competition here