Shengfeng Development Limited
Shengfeng Development Limited (SFWL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SFWL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFWL | $0.98 | -2.48% | 80.9M | 7.00 | $0.14 | N/A |
| FDX | $374.97 | +1.42% | 89.5B | 20.04 | $18.71 | +1.55% |
| UPS | $96.83 | +1.36% | 82.3B | 15.67 | $6.18 | +6.78% |
| JBHT | $256.53 | -1.89% | 24.2B | 39.77 | $6.45 | +0.69% |
| XPO | $202.30 | +0.92% | 23.8B | 69.76 | $2.90 | N/A |
| EXPD | $157.60 | +0.53% | 20.6B | 25.47 | $6.19 | +0.98% |
| CHRW | $173.02 | +1.94% | 20.4B | 35.02 | $4.94 | +1.44% |
| ZTO | $23.55 | +0.00% | 18.8B | 14.36 | $1.64 | +2.93% |
| LSTR | $182.15 | +1.70% | 6.2B | 50.32 | $3.62 | +2.19% |
| GXO | $45.52 | -3.44% | 5.2B | 40.65 | $1.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SFWL vs FDX Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while FDX trades at $374.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check FDX's competition here
SFWL vs UPS Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while UPS trades at $96.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check UPS's competition here
SFWL vs JBHT Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while JBHT trades at $256.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 39.77. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check JBHT's competition here
SFWL vs XPO Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while XPO trades at $202.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 69.76. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check XPO's competition here
SFWL vs EXPD Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while EXPD trades at $157.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check EXPD's competition here
SFWL vs CHRW Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while CHRW trades at $173.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 35.02. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CHRW's competition here
SFWL vs ZTO Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while ZTO trades at $23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ZTO's competition here
SFWL vs LSTR Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while LSTR trades at $182.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 50.32. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check LSTR's competition here
SFWL vs GXO Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while GXO trades at $45.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 40.65. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check GXO's competition here
SFWL vs HUBG Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while HUBG trades at $38.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check HUBG's competition here
SFWL vs PBI Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while PBI trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check PBI's competition here
SFWL vs CYRX Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 656.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while CYRX trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -14.48. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CYRX's competition here
SFWL vs RLGT Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 387.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while RLGT trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check RLGT's competition here
SFWL vs FWRD Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 262.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while FWRD trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check FWRD's competition here
SFWL vs PAL Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 136.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while PAL trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check PAL's competition here
SFWL vs CRGO Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 105.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while CRGO trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CRGO's competition here
SFWL vs SINO Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SINO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check SINO's competition here
SFWL vs AIRTP Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while AIRTP trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 56.98. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check AIRTP's competition here
SFWL vs FLX Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while FLX trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check FLX's competition here
SFWL vs AIRT Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while AIRT trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check AIRT's competition here
SFWL vs NCEW Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while NCEW trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCEW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check NCEW's competition here
SFWL vs PSIG Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while PSIG trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check PSIG's competition here
SFWL vs BTOC Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while BTOC trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check BTOC's competition here
SFWL vs ELOG Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, ELOG has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while ELOG trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas ELOG's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to ELOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ELOG's competition here
SFWL vs JYD Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while JYD trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JYD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check JYD's competition here
SFWL vs LSH Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while LSH trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSH's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check LSH's competition here
SFWL vs GVH Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while GVH trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check GVH's competition here
SFWL vs CRGOW Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while CRGOW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CRGOW's competition here
SFWL vs CJMB Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while CJMB trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CJMB's competition here
SFWL vs ATXG Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while ATXG trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ATXG's competition here
SFWL vs SGLY Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while SGLY trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check SGLY's competition here
SFWL vs AIRTW Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check AIRTW's competition here
SFWL vs UTIW Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, UTIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while UTIW trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas UTIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UTIW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to UTIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check UTIW's competition here
SFWL vs ECHO Comparison May 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 80.9M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.98, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ECHO's competition here