Radiant Logistics, Inc.
Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RLGT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLGT | $8.22 | -0.84% | 385M | 24.91 | $0.33 | N/A |
| FDX | $369.75 | -1.60% | 88.2B | 19.76 | $18.71 | +1.55% |
| UPS | $95.56 | -3.41% | 81.2B | 15.46 | $6.18 | +6.63% |
| JBHT | $261.46 | -0.29% | 24.7B | 40.54 | $6.45 | +0.68% |
| XPO | $200.45 | -1.85% | 23.5B | 69.12 | $2.90 | N/A |
| EXPD | $156.77 | +0.85% | 20.5B | 25.33 | $6.19 | +0.99% |
| CHRW | $169.72 | +3.75% | 20B | 34.36 | $4.94 | +1.53% |
| ZTO | $23.55 | -0.84% | 18.8B | 14.27 | $1.65 | +2.90% |
| LSTR | $179.11 | +1.74% | 6.1B | 49.48 | $3.62 | +2.05% |
| GXO | $47.13 | -2.19% | 5.4B | 42.08 | $1.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RLGT vs FDX Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 88.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while FDX trades at $369.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check FDX's competition here
RLGT vs UPS Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 81.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while UPS trades at $95.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check UPS's competition here
RLGT vs JBHT Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while JBHT trades at $261.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 40.54. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check JBHT's competition here
RLGT vs XPO Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while XPO trades at $200.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 69.12. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check XPO's competition here
RLGT vs EXPD Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while EXPD trades at $156.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check EXPD's competition here
RLGT vs CHRW Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while CHRW trades at $169.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check CHRW's competition here
RLGT vs ZTO Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while ZTO trades at $23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check ZTO's competition here
RLGT vs LSTR Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while LSTR trades at $179.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 49.48. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check LSTR's competition here
RLGT vs GXO Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while GXO trades at $47.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 42.08. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check GXO's competition here
RLGT vs HUBG Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while HUBG trades at $38.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check HUBG's competition here
RLGT vs PBI Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while PBI trades at $16.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check PBI's competition here
RLGT vs CYRX Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 670.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while CYRX trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -14.79. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CYRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check CYRX's competition here
RLGT vs FWRD Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 268.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while FWRD trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check FWRD's competition here
RLGT vs PAL Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 139.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while PAL trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check PAL's competition here
RLGT vs CRGO Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 106M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while CRGO trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check CRGO's competition here
RLGT vs SINO Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SINO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check SINO's competition here
RLGT vs SFWL Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while SFWL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check SFWL's competition here
RLGT vs AIRTP Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while AIRTP trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 57.59. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check AIRTP's competition here
RLGT vs AIRT Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while AIRT trades at $21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -8.72. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check AIRT's competition here
RLGT vs FLX Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while FLX trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check FLX's competition here
RLGT vs NCEW Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while NCEW trades at $19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NCEW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check NCEW's competition here
RLGT vs PSIG Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while PSIG trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check PSIG's competition here
RLGT vs BTOC Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while BTOC trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check BTOC's competition here
RLGT vs JYD Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while JYD trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JYD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check JYD's competition here
RLGT vs ELOG Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, ELOG has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while ELOG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas ELOG's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to ELOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check ELOG's competition here
RLGT vs LSH Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while LSH trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSH's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check LSH's competition here
RLGT vs GVH Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while GVH trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check GVH's competition here
RLGT vs CRGOW Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while CRGOW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check CRGOW's competition here
RLGT vs CJMB Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while CJMB trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check CJMB's competition here
RLGT vs ATXG Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while ATXG trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check ATXG's competition here
RLGT vs SGLY Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while SGLY trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check SGLY's competition here
RLGT vs AIRTW Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check AIRTW's competition here
RLGT vs UTIW Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, UTIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while UTIW trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas UTIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UTIW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to UTIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check UTIW's competition here
RLGT vs ECHO Comparison May 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 385M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $8.22, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check ECHO's competition here