Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RLGT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLGT | $9.61 | +1.26% | 450.3M | 20.03 | $0.48 | N/A |
| UPS | $109.99 | -0.61% | 82.1B | 16.32 | $6.74 | +5.93% |
| FDX | $309.93 | -0.98% | 74B | 15.34 | $20.21 | +1.51% |
| JBHT | $277.74 | -2.83% | 26.2B | 42.99 | $6.46 | +0.62% |
| XPO | $206.78 | +0.22% | 24.3B | 51.58 | $4.01 | N/A |
| CHRW | $188.57 | -0.67% | 22.2B | 35.78 | $5.27 | +1.32% |
| EXPD | $165.70 | -1.12% | 21.7B | 26.82 | $6.18 | +0.94% |
| FDXF | $152.68 | +1.24% | 19.3B | 408.54 | $0.37 | N/A |
| ZTO | $23.03 | -0.22% | 18.2B | 13.70 | $1.68 | +2.99% |
| LSTR | $203.59 | -2.22% | 6.9B | 42.24 | $4.82 | +1.73% |
Stock Comparison
RLGT vs UPS Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while UPS trades at $109.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check UPS's competition here
RLGT vs FDX Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while FDX trades at $309.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check FDX's competition here
RLGT vs JBHT Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while JBHT trades at $277.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 42.99. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check JBHT's competition here
RLGT vs XPO Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while XPO trades at $206.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 51.58. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check XPO's competition here
RLGT vs CHRW Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while CHRW trades at $188.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 35.78. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check CHRW's competition here
RLGT vs EXPD Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while EXPD trades at $165.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check EXPD's competition here
RLGT vs FDXF Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, FDXF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while FDXF trades at $152.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas FDXF's P/E ratio is 408.54. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FDXF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to FDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check FDXF's competition here
RLGT vs ZTO Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while ZTO trades at $23.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check ZTO's competition here
RLGT vs LSTR Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while LSTR trades at $203.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 42.24. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check LSTR's competition here
RLGT vs GXO Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while GXO trades at $51.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check GXO's competition here
RLGT vs HUBG Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while HUBG trades at $45.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check HUBG's competition here
RLGT vs PBI Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while PBI trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check PBI's competition here
RLGT vs CYRX Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 767.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while CYRX trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -16.74. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CYRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check CYRX's competition here
RLGT vs FWRD Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 410.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while FWRD trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check FWRD's competition here
RLGT vs OP Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 252.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while OP trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check OP's competition here
RLGT vs PAL Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 184.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while PAL trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is 34.89. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check PAL's competition here
RLGT vs SINO Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SINO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check SINO's competition here
RLGT vs AIRT Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while AIRT trades at $30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check AIRT's competition here
RLGT vs AIRTP Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 79.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while AIRTP trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check AIRTP's competition here
RLGT vs SFWL Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while SFWL trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check SFWL's competition here
RLGT vs CRGO Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while CRGO trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check CRGO's competition here
RLGT vs CRGOW Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while CRGOW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check CRGOW's competition here
RLGT vs FLX Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while FLX trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check FLX's competition here
RLGT vs NCEW Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while NCEW trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NCEW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check NCEW's competition here
RLGT vs BTOC Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while BTOC trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check BTOC's competition here
RLGT vs ELOG Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, ELOG has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while ELOG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas ELOG's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELOG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to ELOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check ELOG's competition here
RLGT vs GVH Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while GVH trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check GVH's competition here
RLGT vs LSH Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while LSH trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSH's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check LSH's competition here
RLGT vs PSIG Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while PSIG trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check PSIG's competition here
RLGT vs CJMB Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while CJMB trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check CJMB's competition here
RLGT vs ATXG Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while ATXG trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check ATXG's competition here
RLGT vs JYD Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while JYD trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JYD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check JYD's competition here
RLGT vs SGLY Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while SGLY trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check SGLY's competition here
RLGT vs YGMZ Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, YGMZ has a market cap of 103.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while YGMZ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas YGMZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YGMZ's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to YGMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check YGMZ's competition here
RLGT vs UTIW Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, UTIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while UTIW trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas UTIW's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UTIW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to UTIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check UTIW's competition here
RLGT vs AIRTW Comparison July 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 450.3M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.61, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check AIRTW's competition here