BingEx Limited
BingEx Limited (FLX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLX | $2.43 | -1.62% | 55.9M | 10.57 | $0.23 | N/A |
| FDX | $374.97 | +1.42% | 89.5B | 20.04 | $18.71 | +1.55% |
| UPS | $96.83 | +1.36% | 82.3B | 15.67 | $6.18 | +6.78% |
| JBHT | $256.53 | -1.89% | 24.2B | 39.77 | $6.45 | +0.69% |
| XPO | $202.30 | +0.92% | 23.8B | 69.76 | $2.90 | N/A |
| EXPD | $157.60 | +0.53% | 20.6B | 25.47 | $6.19 | +0.98% |
| CHRW | $173.02 | +1.94% | 20.4B | 35.02 | $4.94 | +1.44% |
| ZTO | $23.55 | +0.00% | 18.8B | 14.36 | $1.64 | +2.93% |
| LSTR | $182.15 | +1.70% | 6.2B | 50.32 | $3.62 | +2.19% |
| GXO | $45.52 | -3.44% | 5.2B | 40.65 | $1.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FLX vs FDX Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while FDX trades at $374.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check FDX's competition here
FLX vs UPS Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while UPS trades at $96.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check UPS's competition here
FLX vs JBHT Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while JBHT trades at $256.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 39.77. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check JBHT's competition here
FLX vs XPO Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while XPO trades at $202.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 69.76. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check XPO's competition here
FLX vs EXPD Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while EXPD trades at $157.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check EXPD's competition here
FLX vs CHRW Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while CHRW trades at $173.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 35.02. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CHRW's competition here
FLX vs ZTO Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while ZTO trades at $23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ZTO's competition here
FLX vs LSTR Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while LSTR trades at $182.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 50.32. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check LSTR's competition here
FLX vs GXO Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while GXO trades at $45.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 40.65. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check GXO's competition here
FLX vs HUBG Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while HUBG trades at $38.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check HUBG's competition here
FLX vs PBI Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while PBI trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check PBI's competition here
FLX vs CYRX Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 656.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while CYRX trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -14.48. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CYRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CYRX's competition here
FLX vs RLGT Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 387.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while RLGT trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check RLGT's competition here
FLX vs FWRD Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 262.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while FWRD trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check FWRD's competition here
FLX vs PAL Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 136.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while PAL trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check PAL's competition here
FLX vs CRGO Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 105.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while CRGO trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CRGO's competition here
FLX vs SINO Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SINO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check SINO's competition here
FLX vs SFWL Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while SFWL trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check SFWL's competition here
FLX vs AIRTP Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while AIRTP trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 56.98. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check AIRTP's competition here
FLX vs AIRT Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while AIRT trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check AIRT's competition here
FLX vs NCEW Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while NCEW trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCEW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check NCEW's competition here
FLX vs PSIG Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while PSIG trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check PSIG's competition here
FLX vs BTOC Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while BTOC trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check BTOC's competition here
FLX vs ELOG Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, ELOG has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while ELOG trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas ELOG's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to ELOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ELOG's competition here
FLX vs JYD Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while JYD trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JYD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check JYD's competition here
FLX vs LSH Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while LSH trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LSH's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check LSH's competition here
FLX vs GVH Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while GVH trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check GVH's competition here
FLX vs CRGOW Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while CRGOW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CRGOW's competition here
FLX vs CJMB Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while CJMB trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CJMB's competition here
FLX vs ATXG Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while ATXG trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ATXG's competition here
FLX vs SGLY Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while SGLY trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check SGLY's competition here
FLX vs AIRTW Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check AIRTW's competition here
FLX vs ECHO Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ECHO's competition here
FLX vs UTIW Comparison May 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.9M. In comparison, UTIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.43, while UTIW trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas UTIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UTIW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to UTIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check UTIW's competition here