BingEx Limited (FLX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLX | $2.27 | -0.44% | 51.9M | 14.19 | $0.16 | N/A |
| UPS | $107.70 | -0.77% | 91.5B | 17.43 | $6.18 | +6.08% |
| FDX | $330.22 | -0.24% | 78.8B | 17.62 | $18.73 | +1.41% |
| JBHT | $288.17 | +1.13% | 27.2B | 44.75 | $6.44 | +0.62% |
| XPO | $224.66 | +2.61% | 26.4B | 77.26 | $2.91 | N/A |
| FDXF | $178.77 | +6.51% | 22.6B | 39.33 | $4.55 | N/A |
| CHRW | $188.14 | +2.20% | 22.2B | 38.16 | $4.93 | +1.34% |
| EXPD | $163.44 | +1.87% | 21.4B | 26.41 | $6.19 | +0.97% |
| ZTO | $22.10 | -0.81% | 17.5B | 13.08 | $1.69 | +3.11% |
| LSTR | $225.37 | +3.35% | 7.6B | 62.26 | $3.62 | +1.59% |
Stock Comparison
FLX vs UPS Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 91.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while UPS trades at $107.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check UPS's competition here
FLX vs FDX Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while FDX trades at $330.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check FDX's competition here
FLX vs JBHT Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while JBHT trades at $288.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 44.75. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check JBHT's competition here
FLX vs XPO Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while XPO trades at $224.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 77.26. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check XPO's competition here
FLX vs FDXF Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, FDXF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while FDXF trades at $178.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas FDXF's P/E ratio is 39.33. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to FDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check FDXF's competition here
FLX vs CHRW Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while CHRW trades at $188.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 38.16. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CHRW's competition here
FLX vs EXPD Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while EXPD trades at $163.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check EXPD's competition here
FLX vs ZTO Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while ZTO trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ZTO's competition here
FLX vs LSTR Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while LSTR trades at $225.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 62.26. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check LSTR's competition here
FLX vs GXO Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while GXO trades at $49.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 43.85. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check GXO's competition here
FLX vs HUBG Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while HUBG trades at $44.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check HUBG's competition here
FLX vs PBI Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while PBI trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check PBI's competition here
FLX vs CYRX Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 780.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while CYRX trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CYRX's competition here
FLX vs RLGT Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 422.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while RLGT trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check RLGT's competition here
FLX vs FWRD Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 363.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while FWRD trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check FWRD's competition here
FLX vs PAL Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 198.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while PAL trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check PAL's competition here
FLX vs SINO Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SINO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check SINO's competition here
FLX vs CRGO Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 86.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while CRGO trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CRGO's competition here
FLX vs SFWL Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 73M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while SFWL trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check SFWL's competition here
FLX vs AIRT Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while AIRT trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -9.49. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check AIRT's competition here
FLX vs AIRTP Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while AIRTP trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 56.70. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check AIRTP's competition here
FLX vs NCEW Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while NCEW trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCEW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check NCEW's competition here
FLX vs PSIG Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while PSIG trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check PSIG's competition here
FLX vs BTOC Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while BTOC trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check BTOC's competition here
FLX vs ELOG Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, ELOG has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while ELOG trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas ELOG's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to ELOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ELOG's competition here
FLX vs LSH Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while LSH trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSH's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check LSH's competition here
FLX vs GVH Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while GVH trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check GVH's competition here
FLX vs CRGOW Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while CRGOW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CRGOW's competition here
FLX vs CJMB Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while CJMB trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CJMB's competition here
FLX vs ATXG Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while ATXG trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ATXG's competition here
FLX vs JYD Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while JYD trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JYD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check JYD's competition here
FLX vs SGLY Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while SGLY trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check SGLY's competition here
FLX vs AIRTW Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check AIRTW's competition here
FLX vs UTIW Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, UTIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while UTIW trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas UTIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UTIW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to UTIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check UTIW's competition here
FLX vs ECHO Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 51.9M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.27, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ECHO's competition here