Freightos Limited (CRGOW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRGOW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRGOW | $0.04 | -9.13% | 84.5M | -0.11 | -$0.39 | N/A |
| UPS | $109.91 | +0.34% | 82.6B | 16.42 | $6.74 | +5.93% |
| FDX | $308.87 | -1.60% | 74.7B | 15.49 | $20.21 | +1.51% |
| JBHT | $278.87 | -3.86% | 27B | 44.25 | $6.46 | +0.62% |
| XPO | $208.01 | +0.46% | 24.2B | 51.45 | $4.01 | N/A |
| CHRW | $188.03 | -1.70% | 22.4B | 36.02 | $5.27 | +1.32% |
| EXPD | $164.88 | -1.16% | 21.9B | 27.11 | $6.18 | +0.94% |
| FDXF | $153.49 | -1.46% | 19.1B | 403.67 | $0.37 | N/A |
| ZTO | $23.02 | +1.03% | 18.3B | 13.74 | $1.68 | +2.99% |
| LSTR | $201.96 | -2.60% | 7.1B | 43.20 | $4.82 | +1.73% |
Stock Comparison
CRGOW vs UPS Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 82.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while UPS trades at $109.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check UPS's competition here
CRGOW vs FDX Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while FDX trades at $308.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check FDX's competition here
CRGOW vs JBHT Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while JBHT trades at $278.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 44.25. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check JBHT's competition here
CRGOW vs XPO Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while XPO trades at $208.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 51.45. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check XPO's competition here
CRGOW vs CHRW Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while CHRW trades at $188.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check CHRW's competition here
CRGOW vs EXPD Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while EXPD trades at $164.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check EXPD's competition here
CRGOW vs FDXF Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, FDXF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while FDXF trades at $153.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FDXF's P/E ratio is 403.67. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FDXF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to FDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check FDXF's competition here
CRGOW vs ZTO Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while ZTO trades at $23.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check ZTO's competition here
CRGOW vs LSTR Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while LSTR trades at $201.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 43.20. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check LSTR's competition here
CRGOW vs GXO Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while GXO trades at $51.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check GXO's competition here
CRGOW vs HUBG Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while HUBG trades at $45.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check HUBG's competition here
CRGOW vs PBI Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while PBI trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to PBI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check PBI's competition here
CRGOW vs CYRX Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 780.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while CYRX trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -17.02. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CYRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check CYRX's competition here
CRGOW vs RLGT Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 444.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while RLGT trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check RLGT's competition here
CRGOW vs FWRD Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 425.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while FWRD trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check FWRD's competition here
CRGOW vs OP Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 266.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while OP trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check OP's competition here
CRGOW vs PAL Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 177.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while PAL trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check PAL's competition here
CRGOW vs SINO Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SINO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check SINO's competition here
CRGOW vs AIRT Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while AIRT trades at $33.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check AIRT's competition here
CRGOW vs SFWL Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 73.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while SFWL trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check SFWL's competition here
CRGOW vs AIRTP Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while AIRTP trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check AIRTP's competition here
CRGOW vs CRGO Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while CRGO trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check CRGO's competition here
CRGOW vs FLX Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while FLX trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check FLX's competition here
CRGOW vs NCEW Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while NCEW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to NCEW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check NCEW's competition here
CRGOW vs BTOC Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while BTOC trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check BTOC's competition here
CRGOW vs ELOG Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, ELOG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while ELOG trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ELOG's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ELOG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to ELOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check ELOG's competition here
CRGOW vs GVH Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while GVH trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check GVH's competition here
CRGOW vs LSH Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while LSH trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LSH's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check LSH's competition here
CRGOW vs PSIG Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while PSIG trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check PSIG's competition here
CRGOW vs CJMB Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while CJMB trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check CJMB's competition here
CRGOW vs ATXG Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while ATXG trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW and ATXG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATXG's competition here
CRGOW vs JYD Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while JYD trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to JYD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check JYD's competition here
CRGOW vs SGLY Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while SGLY trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check SGLY's competition here
CRGOW vs YGMZ Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, YGMZ has a market cap of 13.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while YGMZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas YGMZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to YGMZ's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to YGMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check YGMZ's competition here
CRGOW vs UTIW Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, UTIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while UTIW trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas UTIW's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to UTIW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to UTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check UTIW's competition here
CRGOW vs AIRTW Comparison July 2026
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 84.5M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.04, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.45%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check AIRTW's competition here