UTi Worldwide, Inc.
UTi Worldwide, Inc. (UTIW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UTIW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTIW | $7.09 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FDX | $390.21 | +0.60% | 93.1B | 20.82 | $18.74 | +1.48% |
| UPS | $103.94 | -3.97% | 88.3B | 15.84 | $6.56 | +6.28% |
| XPO | $222.01 | +0.91% | 26.1B | 84.09 | $2.64 | N/A |
| JBHT | $251.29 | +0.45% | 23.8B | 39.02 | $6.44 | +0.71% |
| CHRW | $187.96 | -0.24% | 22.3B | 38.92 | $4.83 | +1.32% |
| ZTO | $25.62 | +0.79% | 20.4B | 15.63 | $1.64 | +2.66% |
| EXPD | $147.38 | -0.49% | 19.6B | 24.77 | $5.95 | +1.04% |
| GXO | $56.80 | -0.61% | 6.5B | 202.89 | $0.28 | N/A |
| LSTR | $182.41 | +1.27% | 6.2B | 55.11 | $3.31 | +1.97% |
Stock Comparison
UTIW vs FDX Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 93.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while FDX trades at $390.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check FDX's competition here
UTIW vs UPS Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while UPS trades at $103.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check UPS's competition here
UTIW vs XPO Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while XPO trades at $222.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 84.09. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check XPO's competition here
UTIW vs JBHT Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while JBHT trades at $251.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 39.02. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check JBHT's competition here
UTIW vs CHRW Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while CHRW trades at $187.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 38.92. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check CHRW's competition here
UTIW vs ZTO Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while ZTO trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check ZTO's competition here
UTIW vs EXPD Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while EXPD trades at $147.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check EXPD's competition here
UTIW vs GXO Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while GXO trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 202.89. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check GXO's competition here
UTIW vs LSTR Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while LSTR trades at $182.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 55.11. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check LSTR's competition here
UTIW vs PBI Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while PBI trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to PBI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check PBI's competition here
UTIW vs HUBG Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while HUBG trades at $43.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check HUBG's competition here
UTIW vs FWRD Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 707.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while FWRD trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check FWRD's competition here
UTIW vs CYRX Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 506.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while CYRX trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -12.01. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CYRX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check CYRX's competition here
UTIW vs RLGT Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 402M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while RLGT trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check RLGT's competition here
UTIW vs PAL Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 203.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while PAL trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check PAL's competition here
UTIW vs CRGO Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 103.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while CRGO trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check CRGO's competition here
UTIW vs SINO Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SINO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check SINO's competition here
UTIW vs SFWL Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while SFWL trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check SFWL's competition here
UTIW vs FLX Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while FLX trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check FLX's competition here
UTIW vs AIRT Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while AIRT trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -8.78. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is more volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check AIRT's competition here
UTIW vs AIRTP Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while AIRTP trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 56.47. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check AIRTP's competition here
UTIW vs NCEW Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while NCEW trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to NCEW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check NCEW's competition here
UTIW vs PSIG Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while PSIG trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check PSIG's competition here
UTIW vs BTOC Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while BTOC trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check BTOC's competition here
UTIW vs JYD Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while JYD trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to JYD's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check JYD's competition here
UTIW vs ELOG Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, ELOG has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while ELOG trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELOG's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ELOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to ELOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check ELOG's competition here
UTIW vs CRGOW Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while CRGOW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check CRGOW's competition here
UTIW vs LSH Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while LSH trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to LSH's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check LSH's competition here
UTIW vs GVH Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while GVH trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check GVH's competition here
UTIW vs CJMB Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while CJMB trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check CJMB's competition here
UTIW vs ATXG Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while ATXG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check ATXG's competition here
UTIW vs SGLY Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while SGLY trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check SGLY's competition here
UTIW vs AIRTW Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check AIRTW's competition here
UTIW vs ECHO Comparison April 2026
UTIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTIW stands at 0. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UTIW is priced at $7.09, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIW's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIW is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIW.Check ECHO's competition here