Urstadt Biddle Properties Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for UBA
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for UBA
Urstadt Biddle Properties Inc. (UBA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UBA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBA | $21.14 | -1.81% | 832.2M | 34.66 | $0.61 | +4.47% |
| SPG | $204.76 | -1.35% | 66.5B | 14.45 | $14.17 | +4.20% |
| O | $64.00 | -1.42% | 59.7B | 54.74 | $1.17 | +5.03% |
| SPG-PJ | $53.40 | +0.40% | 55.1B | 7.88 | $6.78 | +4.20% |
| KIM-PN | $60.55 | +0.67% | 40.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.19% |
| KIM | $23.69 | -1.54% | 16B | 28.55 | $0.83 | +2.19% |
| REG | $80.01 | -1.37% | 14.6B | 28.37 | $2.82 | +1.88% |
| KIM-PM | $20.02 | -0.55% | 13.5B | 12.16 | $1.65 | +2.19% |
| KIM-PL | $19.47 | -1.42% | 13.1B | 11.83 | $1.65 | +2.19% |
| FRT | $111.13 | -1.06% | 9.6B | 23.74 | $4.68 | +4.01% |
Stock Comparison
UBA vs SPG Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SPG trades at $204.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPG's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check SPG's competition here
UBA vs O Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, O has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while O trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas O's P/E ratio is 54.74. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check O's competition here
UBA vs SPG-PJ Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SPG-PJ trades at $53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check SPG-PJ's competition here
UBA vs KIM-PN Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KIM-PN trades at $60.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check KIM-PN's competition here
UBA vs KIM Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KIM trades at $23.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check KIM's competition here
UBA vs REG Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while REG trades at $80.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 28.37. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check REG's competition here
UBA vs KIM-PM Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KIM-PM trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check KIM-PM's competition here
UBA vs KIM-PL Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KIM-PL trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check KIM-PL's competition here
UBA vs FRT Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while FRT trades at $111.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check FRT's competition here
UBA vs ADC Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ADC trades at $78.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 44.58. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check ADC's competition here
UBA vs BRX Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BRX trades at $30.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check BRX's competition here
UBA vs NNN Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while NNN trades at $44.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check NNN's competition here
UBA vs FRT-PC Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while FRT-PC trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check FRT-PC's competition here
UBA vs MAC Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while MAC trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is -27.70. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check MAC's competition here
UBA vs KRG Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KRG trades at $26.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check KRG's competition here
UBA vs PECO Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PECO trades at $38.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 43.69. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check PECO's competition here
UBA vs REGCP Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while REGCP trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check REGCP's competition here
UBA vs SKT Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SKT trades at $36.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 37.14. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check SKT's competition here
UBA vs REGCO Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while REGCO trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check REGCO's competition here
UBA vs CURB Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CURB trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 73.19. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check CURB's competition here
UBA vs FCPT Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while FCPT trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check FCPT's competition here
UBA vs AKR Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while AKR trades at $21.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 210.85. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check AKR's competition here
UBA vs IVT Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while IVT trades at $32.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check IVT's competition here
UBA vs ROIC Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check ROIC's competition here
UBA vs GTY Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while GTY trades at $34.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check GTY's competition here
UBA vs ADC-PA Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ADC-PA trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check ADC-PA's competition here
UBA vs NTST Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while NTST trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is 174.25. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check NTST's competition here
UBA vs ALEX Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ALEX trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check ALEX's competition here
UBA vs CBL Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CBL trades at $43.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check CBL's competition here
UBA vs ALX Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ALX trades at $252.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 45.75. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check ALX's competition here
UBA vs RPT-PD Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check RPT-PD's competition here
UBA vs WSR Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 972.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WSR trades at $18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check WSR's competition here
UBA vs UBP Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check UBP's competition here
UBA vs BFS Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 830.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BFS trades at $33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 31.09. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check BFS's competition here
UBA vs UBP-PK Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check UBP-PK's competition here
UBA vs BFS-PD Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 753.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BFS-PD trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check BFS-PD's competition here
UBA vs UBP-PH Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check UBP-PH's competition here
UBA vs BFS-PE Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 532.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BFS-PE trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check BFS-PE's competition here
UBA vs SITC-PA Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check SITC-PA's competition here
UBA vs RVI Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 307.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while RVI trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RVI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check RVI's competition here
UBA vs SITC Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 283.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SITC trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check SITC's competition here
UBA vs CDR-PB Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 281.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CDR-PB trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check CDR-PB's competition here
UBA vs PINE Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 278.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PINE trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is -88.45. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PINE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check PINE's competition here
UBA vs CDR-PC Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 278.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CDR-PC trades at $20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check CDR-PC's competition here
UBA vs SRG-PA Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SRG-PA trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check SRG-PA's competition here
UBA vs SRG Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 142.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SRG trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check SRG's competition here
UBA vs WHLRL Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WHLRL trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -42.83. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check WHLRL's competition here
UBA vs WHLRP Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WHLRP trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check WHLRP's competition here
UBA vs WHLRD Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WHLRD trades at $35.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -19.19. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check WHLRD's competition here
UBA vs WHLR Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 134.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WHLR trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check WHLR's competition here
UBA vs HMG Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check HMG's competition here
UBA vs WRI Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check WRI's competition here
UBA vs PEI-PB Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check PEI-PB's competition here
UBA vs PEI Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check PEI's competition here
UBA vs CDR Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check CDR's competition here
UBA vs PEI-PC Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check PEI-PC's competition here
UBA vs WPG Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check WPG's competition here
UBA vs PEI-PD Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check PEI-PD's competition here
UBA vs EQY Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, EQY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while EQY trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas EQY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EQY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to EQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check EQY's competition here
UBA vs NNN-PF Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check NNN-PF's competition here
UBA vs BPYU Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check BPYU's competition here
UBA vs BPYUP Comparison April 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check BPYUP's competition here