Saul Centers, Inc.
Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS-PE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BFS-PE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFS-PE | $23.11 | +1.58% | 573.5M | 13.83 | $1.69 | +6.96% |
| SPG | $200.56 | -2.48% | 65.2B | 13.95 | $14.38 | +4.31% |
| O | $61.52 | -1.61% | 57.3B | 50.41 | $1.22 | +5.27% |
| SPG-PJ | $54.20 | +0.00% | 56B | 8.00 | $6.78 | +4.31% |
| KIM-PN | $60.70 | +0.00% | 40.9B | N/A | N/A | +4.43% |
| KIM | $23.08 | -2.00% | 15.6B | 26.53 | $0.87 | +4.43% |
| REG | $76.67 | -1.21% | 14B | 26.34 | $2.91 | +3.81% |
| KIM-PM | $20.29 | -0.51% | 13.7B | 12.33 | $1.65 | +4.43% |
| KIM-PL | $19.73 | -0.10% | 13.3B | 11.99 | $1.65 | +4.43% |
| FRT | $114.13 | -1.23% | 9.9B | 19.79 | $5.77 | +3.94% |
Stock Comparison
BFS-PE vs SPG Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while SPG trades at $200.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPG's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check SPG's competition here
BFS-PE vs O Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, O has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while O trades at $61.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas O's P/E ratio is 50.41. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check O's competition here
BFS-PE vs SPG-PJ Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while SPG-PJ trades at $54.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check SPG-PJ's competition here
BFS-PE vs KIM-PN Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while KIM-PN trades at $60.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check KIM-PN's competition here
BFS-PE vs KIM Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while KIM trades at $23.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check KIM's competition here
BFS-PE vs REG Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while REG trades at $76.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check REG's competition here
BFS-PE vs KIM-PM Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while KIM-PM trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check KIM-PM's competition here
BFS-PE vs KIM-PL Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while KIM-PL trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check KIM-PL's competition here
BFS-PE vs FRT Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while FRT trades at $114.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check FRT's competition here
BFS-PE vs ADC Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while ADC trades at $75.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 40.63. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check ADC's competition here
BFS-PE vs BRX Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while BRX trades at $29.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check BRX's competition here
BFS-PE vs NNN Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while NNN trades at $43.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check NNN's competition here
BFS-PE vs FRT-PC Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while FRT-PC trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check FRT-PC's competition here
BFS-PE vs MAC Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while MAC trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is -30.53. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check MAC's competition here
BFS-PE vs KRG Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while KRG trades at $26.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check KRG's competition here
BFS-PE vs PECO Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while PECO trades at $39.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 42.78. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check PECO's competition here
BFS-PE vs REGCP Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while REGCP trades at $23.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check REGCP's competition here
BFS-PE vs REGCO Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while REGCO trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check REGCO's competition here
BFS-PE vs SKT Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while SKT trades at $35.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check SKT's competition here
BFS-PE vs CURB Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while CURB trades at $27.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 91.35. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check CURB's competition here
BFS-PE vs AKR Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while AKR trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 68.26. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check AKR's competition here
BFS-PE vs FCPT Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while FCPT trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check FCPT's competition here
BFS-PE vs IVT Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while IVT trades at $30.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check IVT's competition here
BFS-PE vs ROIC Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check ROIC's competition here
BFS-PE vs GTY Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while GTY trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check GTY's competition here
BFS-PE vs ADC-PA Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while ADC-PA trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check ADC-PA's competition here
BFS-PE vs NTST Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while NTST trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is 170.67. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check NTST's competition here
BFS-PE vs ALEX Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while ALEX trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is more volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check ALEX's competition here
BFS-PE vs CBL Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while CBL trades at $45.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check CBL's competition here
BFS-PE vs ALX Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while ALX trades at $226.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check ALX's competition here
BFS-PE vs RPT-PD Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check RPT-PD's competition here
BFS-PE vs WSR Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 975.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while WSR trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check WSR's competition here
BFS-PE vs RVI Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 922.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while RVI trades at $73.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -87.02. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check RVI's competition here
BFS-PE vs UBP Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check UBP's competition here
BFS-PE vs UBA Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check UBA's competition here
BFS-PE vs BFS Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 829.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while BFS trades at $33.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check BFS's competition here
BFS-PE vs UBP-PK Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check UBP-PK's competition here
BFS-PE vs BFS-PD Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 763.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while BFS-PD trades at $20.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check BFS-PD's competition here
BFS-PE vs UBP-PH Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check UBP-PH's competition here
BFS-PE vs SITC-PA Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check SITC-PA's competition here
BFS-PE vs PINE Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 312M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while PINE trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is -236.00. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check PINE's competition here
BFS-PE vs SITC Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 283.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while SITC trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check SITC's competition here
BFS-PE vs CDR-PC Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 271.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while CDR-PC trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check CDR-PC's competition here
BFS-PE vs CDR-PB Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 268.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while CDR-PB trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check CDR-PB's competition here
BFS-PE vs SRG-PA Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 147.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while SRG-PA trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check SRG-PA's competition here
BFS-PE vs SRG Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while SRG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check SRG's competition here
BFS-PE vs WHLRL Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 87.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while WHLRL trades at $83.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -44.88. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is more volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check WHLRL's competition here
BFS-PE vs WHLRP Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while WHLRP trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is more volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check WHLRP's competition here
BFS-PE vs WHLRD Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while WHLRD trades at $35.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -19.06. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check WHLRD's competition here
BFS-PE vs WHLR Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 81.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while WHLR trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check WHLR's competition here
BFS-PE vs BPYUP Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check BPYUP's competition here
BFS-PE vs CDR Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check CDR's competition here
BFS-PE vs NNN-PF Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check NNN-PF's competition here
BFS-PE vs WPG Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check WPG's competition here
BFS-PE vs WRI Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check WRI's competition here
BFS-PE vs PEI-PC Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check PEI-PC's competition here
BFS-PE vs PEI Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEI's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check PEI's competition here
BFS-PE vs EQY Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, EQY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while EQY trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas EQY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to EQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check EQY's competition here
BFS-PE vs HMG Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check HMG's competition here
BFS-PE vs PEI-PD Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check PEI-PD's competition here
BFS-PE vs BPYU Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check BPYU's competition here
BFS-PE vs PEI-PB Comparison May 2026
BFS-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PE stands at 573.5M. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PE is priced at $23.11, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.83, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BFS-PE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PE is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PE.Check PEI-PB's competition here