The Macerich Company (MAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAC | $25.83 | +1.37% | 7.3B | 17.34 | $1.49 | +2.63% |
| SPG | $226.89 | +0.62% | 73.6B | 13.27 | $17.10 | +3.88% |
| O | $63.12 | +1.74% | 58.8B | 52.02 | $1.21 | +5.14% |
| SPG-PJ | $54.83 | -0.76% | 56.6B | 3.81 | $14.40 | +3.88% |
| KIM | $25.89 | +1.45% | 17.4B | 14.54 | $1.78 | +3.99% |
| KIM-PL | $19.31 | +0.05% | 16.8B | 79.07 | $0.24 | +3.99% |
| KIM-PN | $63.40 | +0.27% | 16.7B | 260.42 | $0.24 | +3.99% |
| KIM-PM | $19.60 | -0.56% | 16.7B | 22.11 | $0.89 | +3.99% |
| REG | $81.81 | +1.94% | 15B | 17.48 | $4.68 | +3.65% |
| REGCP | $22.82 | +0.46% | 14.8B | 7.72 | $2.96 | +3.65% |
Stock Comparison
MAC vs SPG Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while SPG trades at $226.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPG's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SPG's competition here
MAC vs O Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, O has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while O trades at $63.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas O's P/E ratio is 52.02. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check O's competition here
MAC vs SPG-PJ Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while SPG-PJ trades at $54.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SPG-PJ's competition here
MAC vs KIM Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while KIM trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check KIM's competition here
MAC vs KIM-PL Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while KIM-PL trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 79.07. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check KIM-PL's competition here
MAC vs KIM-PN Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while KIM-PN trades at $63.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is 260.42. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check KIM-PN's competition here
MAC vs KIM-PM Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while KIM-PM trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check KIM-PM's competition here
MAC vs REG Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while REG trades at $81.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check REG's competition here
MAC vs REGCP Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while REGCP trades at $22.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check REGCP's competition here
MAC vs REGCO Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while REGCO trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check REGCO's competition here
MAC vs FRT Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while FRT trades at $125.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check FRT's competition here
MAC vs BRX Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while BRX trades at $32.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BRX's competition here
MAC vs ADC Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while ADC trades at $77.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check ADC's competition here
MAC vs NNN Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while NNN trades at $47.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check NNN's competition here
MAC vs ADC-PA Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while ADC-PA trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check ADC-PA's competition here
MAC vs FRT-PC Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while FRT-PC trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check FRT-PC's competition here
MAC vs KRG Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while KRG trades at $29.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check KRG's competition here
MAC vs PECO Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while PECO trades at $42.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 46.02. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PECO's competition here
MAC vs SKT Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while SKT trades at $40.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SKT's competition here
MAC vs CURB Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while CURB trades at $31.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 98.97. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check CURB's competition here
MAC vs AKR Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while AKR trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check AKR's competition here
MAC vs IVT Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while IVT trades at $36.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check IVT's competition here
MAC vs FCPT Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while FCPT trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check FCPT's competition here
MAC vs ROIC Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check ROIC's competition here
MAC vs GTY Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while GTY trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check GTY's competition here
MAC vs NTST Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while NTST trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is 162.92. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check NTST's competition here
MAC vs CBL Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while CBL trades at $53.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check CBL's competition here
MAC vs ALEX Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while ALEX trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check ALEX's competition here
MAC vs ALX Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while ALX trades at $274.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check ALX's competition here
MAC vs RPT-PD Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check RPT-PD's competition here
MAC vs WSR Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 974.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while WSR trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WSR's competition here
MAC vs BFS Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 927.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while BFS trades at $37.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BFS's competition here
MAC vs BFS-PE Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 879.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while BFS-PE trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BFS-PE's competition here
MAC vs UBP Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check UBP's competition here
MAC vs UBA Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check UBA's competition here
MAC vs UBP-PK Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check UBP-PK's competition here
MAC vs BFS-PD Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 775.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while BFS-PD trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BFS-PD's competition here
MAC vs UBP-PH Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check UBP-PH's competition here
MAC vs RVI Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 424.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while RVI trades at $33.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -37.41. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RVI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check RVI's competition here
MAC vs SITC-PA Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SITC-PA's competition here
MAC vs CDR-PC Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 249.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while CDR-PC trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is 47.74. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check CDR-PC's competition here
MAC vs SITC Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 238.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while SITC trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 86.44. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SITC's competition here
MAC vs SRG-PA Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 156.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while SRG-PA trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -16.96. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SRG-PA's competition here
MAC vs SRG Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 150.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while SRG trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SRG's competition here
MAC vs WHLRP Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while WHLRP trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WHLRP's competition here
MAC vs WHLRD Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while WHLRD trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WHLRD's competition here
MAC vs WHLRL Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while WHLRL trades at $80.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -42.86. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WHLRL's competition here
MAC vs CDR-PB Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while CDR-PB trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check CDR-PB's competition here
MAC vs WHLR Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 833.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while WHLR trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WHLR's competition here
MAC vs WRI Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WRI's competition here
MAC vs EQY Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, EQY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while EQY trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas EQY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EQY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to EQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check EQY's competition here
MAC vs BPYU Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BPYU's competition here
MAC vs CDR Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check CDR's competition here
MAC vs HMG Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check HMG's competition here
MAC vs NNN-PF Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check NNN-PF's competition here
MAC vs PEI Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PEI's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PEI's competition here
MAC vs PEI-PC Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PEI-PC's competition here
MAC vs PEI-PB Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PEI-PB's competition here
MAC vs PEI-PD Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PEI-PD's competition here
MAC vs WPG Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WPG's competition here
MAC vs BPYUP Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $25.83, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BPYUP's competition here