Tanger Inc. (SKT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SKT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKT | $35.45 | -1.72% | 4.1B | 33.44 | $1.06 | +3.33% |
| SPG | $202.70 | -1.08% | 65.7B | 14.10 | $14.38 | +4.23% |
| SPG-PJ | $54.13 | -0.16% | 55.9B | 7.99 | $6.78 | +4.23% |
| O | $59.55 | -2.82% | 55.5B | 48.81 | $1.22 | +5.81% |
| KIM-PN | $60.94 | -0.31% | 41.1B | N/A | N/A | +4.27% |
| KIM | $23.64 | -1.83% | 15.9B | 27.17 | $0.87 | +4.27% |
| REG | $76.14 | -1.56% | 13.9B | 26.16 | $2.91 | +3.80% |
| KIM-PM | $20.19 | +0.40% | 13.6B | 12.27 | $1.65 | +4.27% |
| KIM-PL | $19.70 | -0.10% | 13.3B | 11.97 | $1.65 | +4.27% |
| FRT | $118.76 | -0.73% | 10.3B | 20.59 | $5.77 | +3.75% |
Stock Comparison
SKT vs SPG Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while SPG trades at $202.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPG's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check SPG's competition here
SKT vs SPG-PJ Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while SPG-PJ trades at $54.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check SPG-PJ's competition here
SKT vs O Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, O has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while O trades at $59.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas O's P/E ratio is 48.81. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check O's competition here
SKT vs KIM-PN Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while KIM-PN trades at $60.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check KIM-PN's competition here
SKT vs KIM Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while KIM trades at $23.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check KIM's competition here
SKT vs REG Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while REG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check REG's competition here
SKT vs KIM-PM Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while KIM-PM trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check KIM-PM's competition here
SKT vs KIM-PL Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while KIM-PL trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check KIM-PL's competition here
SKT vs FRT Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while FRT trades at $118.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check FRT's competition here
SKT vs BRX Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while BRX trades at $30.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check BRX's competition here
SKT vs ADC Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while ADC trades at $72.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 39.17. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check ADC's competition here
SKT vs NNN Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while NNN trades at $43.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check NNN's competition here
SKT vs FRT-PC Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while FRT-PC trades at $19.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check FRT-PC's competition here
SKT vs MAC Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while MAC trades at $22.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is -30.99. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check MAC's competition here
SKT vs KRG Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while KRG trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check KRG's competition here
SKT vs PECO Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while PECO trades at $39.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 42.71. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check PECO's competition here
SKT vs REGCP Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while REGCP trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check REGCP's competition here
SKT vs REGCO Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while REGCO trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check REGCO's competition here
SKT vs CURB Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while CURB trades at $28.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 95.57. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check CURB's competition here
SKT vs AKR Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while AKR trades at $21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check AKR's competition here
SKT vs FCPT Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while FCPT trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check FCPT's competition here
SKT vs IVT Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while IVT trades at $32.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check IVT's competition here
SKT vs ROIC Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check ROIC's competition here
SKT vs ADC-PA Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while ADC-PA trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check ADC-PA's competition here
SKT vs GTY Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while GTY trades at $32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check GTY's competition here
SKT vs NTST Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while NTST trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is 164.63. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check NTST's competition here
SKT vs ALEX Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while ALEX trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check ALEX's competition here
SKT vs CBL Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while CBL trades at $48.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check CBL's competition here
SKT vs ALX Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while ALX trades at $247.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 61.61. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check ALX's competition here
SKT vs RPT-PD Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check RPT-PD's competition here
SKT vs WSR Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 976.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while WSR trades at $19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check WSR's competition here
SKT vs BFS Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 848.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while BFS trades at $34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check BFS's competition here
SKT vs UBP Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check UBP's competition here
SKT vs UBA Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check UBA's competition here
SKT vs UBP-PK Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check UBP-PK's competition here
SKT vs BFS-PD Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 783.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while BFS-PD trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check BFS-PD's competition here
SKT vs UBP-PH Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check UBP-PH's competition here
SKT vs RVI Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 635.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while RVI trades at $50.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -59.96. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RVI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check RVI's competition here
SKT vs BFS-PE Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 543.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while BFS-PE trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check BFS-PE's competition here
SKT vs SITC-PA Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check SITC-PA's competition here
SKT vs PINE Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 317.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while PINE trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is -239.87. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check PINE's competition here
SKT vs CDR-PB Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 276.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while CDR-PB trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check CDR-PB's competition here
SKT vs CDR-PC Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 266.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while CDR-PC trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check CDR-PC's competition here
SKT vs SITC Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 256.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while SITC trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check SITC's competition here
SKT vs SRG-PA Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 146.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while SRG-PA trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check SRG-PA's competition here
SKT vs SRG Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 146.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while SRG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check SRG's competition here
SKT vs WHLRL Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 97.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while WHLRL trades at $93.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -50.05. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check WHLRL's competition here
SKT vs WHLRP Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while WHLRP trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check WHLRP's competition here
SKT vs WHLRD Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while WHLRD trades at $38.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -20.74. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check WHLRD's competition here
SKT vs WHLR Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 66.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while WHLR trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check WHLR's competition here
SKT vs BPYU Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check BPYU's competition here
SKT vs WPG Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check WPG's competition here
SKT vs HMG Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check HMG's competition here
SKT vs CDR Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check CDR's competition here
SKT vs BPYUP Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check BPYUP's competition here
SKT vs PEI-PB Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check PEI-PB's competition here
SKT vs PEI-PC Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check PEI-PC's competition here
SKT vs WRI Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check WRI's competition here
SKT vs NNN-PF Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check NNN-PF's competition here
SKT vs PEI Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PEI's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check PEI's competition here
SKT vs EQY Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EQY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while EQY trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas EQY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EQY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to EQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check EQY's competition here
SKT vs PEI-PD Comparison June 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.45, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 33.44, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check PEI-PD's competition here