Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FRT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRT | $126.02 | +0.53% | 10.9B | 17.03 | $7.40 | +3.59% |
| SPG | $228.70 | +0.09% | 74.2B | 13.37 | $17.10 | +3.86% |
| O | $65.71 | -0.06% | 61.3B | 54.16 | $1.21 | +4.94% |
| SPG-PJ | $54.75 | -0.49% | 56.8B | 3.82 | $14.40 | +3.86% |
| KIM | $26.12 | +0.35% | 17.6B | 16.85 | $1.55 | +3.95% |
| KIM-PL | $19.47 | -0.41% | 17B | 22.67 | $0.86 | +3.95% |
| KIM-PM | $19.87 | +0.10% | 17B | 23.12 | $0.86 | +3.95% |
| KIM-PN | $62.38 | +0.00% | 16.6B | 72.53 | $0.86 | +3.95% |
| REGCP | $23.50 | +1.40% | 15.3B | 7.95 | $2.96 | +3.61% |
| REG | $82.68 | +0.36% | 15.1B | 19.88 | $4.16 | +3.61% |
Stock Comparison
FRT vs SPG Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 74.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while SPG trades at $228.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPG's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check SPG's competition here
FRT vs O Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, O has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while O trades at $65.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas O's P/E ratio is 54.16. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check O's competition here
FRT vs SPG-PJ Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while SPG-PJ trades at $54.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check SPG-PJ's competition here
FRT vs KIM Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while KIM trades at $26.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check KIM's competition here
FRT vs KIM-PL Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while KIM-PL trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check KIM-PL's competition here
FRT vs KIM-PM Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while KIM-PM trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check KIM-PM's competition here
FRT vs KIM-PN Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while KIM-PN trades at $62.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is 72.53. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check KIM-PN's competition here
FRT vs REGCP Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while REGCP trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check REGCP's competition here
FRT vs REG Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while REG trades at $82.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check REG's competition here
FRT vs REGCO Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while REGCO trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check REGCO's competition here
FRT vs BRX Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while BRX trades at $32.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check BRX's competition here
FRT vs ADC Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while ADC trades at $81.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check ADC's competition here
FRT vs ADC-PA Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while ADC-PA trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check ADC-PA's competition here
FRT vs NNN Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while NNN trades at $49.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check NNN's competition here
FRT vs FRT-PC Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while FRT-PC trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check FRT-PC's competition here
FRT vs MAC Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while MAC trades at $25.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check MAC's competition here
FRT vs KRG Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while KRG trades at $29.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check KRG's competition here
FRT vs PECO Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while PECO trades at $44.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 47.84. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check PECO's competition here
FRT vs SKT Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while SKT trades at $41.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check SKT's competition here
FRT vs CURB Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while CURB trades at $31.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 98.84. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check CURB's competition here
FRT vs AKR Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while AKR trades at $22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check AKR's competition here
FRT vs FCPT Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while FCPT trades at $26.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check FCPT's competition here
FRT vs IVT Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while IVT trades at $36.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check IVT's competition here
FRT vs ROIC Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check ROIC's competition here
FRT vs GTY Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while GTY trades at $36.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check GTY's competition here
FRT vs NTST Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while NTST trades at $22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is 171.15. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check NTST's competition here
FRT vs CBL Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while CBL trades at $55.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check CBL's competition here
FRT vs ALEX Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while ALEX trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check ALEX's competition here
FRT vs ALX Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while ALX trades at $281.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check ALX's competition here
FRT vs RPT-PD Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check RPT-PD's competition here
FRT vs WSR Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 976M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while WSR trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check WSR's competition here
FRT vs BFS Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 899.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while BFS trades at $36.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check BFS's competition here
FRT vs BFS-PE Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 863M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while BFS-PE trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check BFS-PE's competition here
FRT vs UBP Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check UBP's competition here
FRT vs UBA Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check UBA's competition here
FRT vs BFS-PD Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 814M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while BFS-PD trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check BFS-PD's competition here
FRT vs UBP-PK Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check UBP-PK's competition here
FRT vs UBP-PH Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check UBP-PH's competition here
FRT vs SITC-PA Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check SITC-PA's competition here
FRT vs CDR-PC Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 236.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while CDR-PC trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is 45.28. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check CDR-PC's competition here
FRT vs SITC Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 235.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while SITC trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 85.20. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check SITC's competition here
FRT vs SRG-PA Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 151.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while SRG-PA trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -16.42. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check SRG-PA's competition here
FRT vs SRG Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while SRG trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check SRG's competition here
FRT vs WHLRP Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while WHLRP trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check WHLRP's competition here
FRT vs WHLRD Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while WHLRD trades at $37.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check WHLRD's competition here
FRT vs WHLRL Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while WHLRL trades at $80.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check WHLRL's competition here
FRT vs CDR-PB Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 208K. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while CDR-PB trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is 37.29. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check CDR-PB's competition here
FRT vs WHLR Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 200.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while WHLR trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check WHLR's competition here
FRT vs BPYU Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check BPYU's competition here
FRT vs EQY Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, EQY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while EQY trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas EQY's P/E ratio is 60.66. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EQY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to EQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check EQY's competition here
FRT vs PEI-PD Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check PEI-PD's competition here
FRT vs PEI-PB Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check PEI-PB's competition here
FRT vs WRI Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check WRI's competition here
FRT vs PEI-PC Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check PEI-PC's competition here
FRT vs NNN-PF Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check NNN-PF's competition here
FRT vs WPG Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check WPG's competition here
FRT vs CDR Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check CDR's competition here
FRT vs PEI Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PEI's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check PEI's competition here
FRT vs HMG Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check HMG's competition here
FRT vs BPYUP Comparison July 2026
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 10.9B. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $126.02, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.Check BPYUP's competition here