Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BFS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFS | $35.30 | -0.65% | 867.1M | 33.35 | $1.06 | +6.61% |
| SPG | $203.55 | +0.01% | 66.1B | 14.18 | $14.37 | +4.23% |
| SPG-PJ | $54.22 | -0.51% | 56B | 8.00 | $6.78 | +4.23% |
| O | $59.72 | -0.32% | 55.7B | 48.97 | $1.22 | +5.40% |
| KIM-PN | $60.50 | +0.00% | 40.8B | N/A | N/A | +4.28% |
| KIM | $23.77 | +0.25% | 16B | 27.33 | $0.87 | +4.28% |
| REG | $76.31 | +0.37% | 14B | 26.22 | $2.91 | +3.83% |
| KIM-PM | $20.01 | -0.20% | 13.5B | 12.16 | $1.65 | +4.28% |
| KIM-PL | $19.71 | +0.61% | 13.4B | 12.03 | $1.65 | +4.28% |
| FRT | $119.42 | +0.08% | 10.3B | 20.66 | $5.78 | +3.76% |
Stock Comparison
BFS vs SPG Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while SPG trades at $203.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPG's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check SPG's competition here
BFS vs SPG-PJ Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while SPG-PJ trades at $54.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check SPG-PJ's competition here
BFS vs O Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, O has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while O trades at $59.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas O's P/E ratio is 48.97. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check O's competition here
BFS vs KIM-PN Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while KIM-PN trades at $60.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check KIM-PN's competition here
BFS vs KIM Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while KIM trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check KIM's competition here
BFS vs REG Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while REG trades at $76.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 26.22. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check REG's competition here
BFS vs KIM-PM Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while KIM-PM trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check KIM-PM's competition here
BFS vs KIM-PL Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while KIM-PL trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check KIM-PL's competition here
BFS vs FRT Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while FRT trades at $119.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check FRT's competition here
BFS vs BRX Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while BRX trades at $30.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check BRX's competition here
BFS vs ADC Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while ADC trades at $72.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 38.94. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check ADC's competition here
BFS vs NNN Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while NNN trades at $44.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check NNN's competition here
BFS vs FRT-PC Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while FRT-PC trades at $19.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check FRT-PC's competition here
BFS vs MAC Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while MAC trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is -30.97. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check MAC's competition here
BFS vs KRG Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while KRG trades at $26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check KRG's competition here
BFS vs PECO Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while PECO trades at $38.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 42.37. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check PECO's competition here
BFS vs REGCP Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while REGCP trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check REGCP's competition here
BFS vs SKT Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while SKT trades at $35.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 33.64. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check SKT's competition here
BFS vs REGCO Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while REGCO trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check REGCO's competition here
BFS vs CURB Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while CURB trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 96.67. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check CURB's competition here
BFS vs AKR Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while AKR trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 70.37. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check AKR's competition here
BFS vs FCPT Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while FCPT trades at $24.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check FCPT's competition here
BFS vs IVT Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while IVT trades at $32.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check IVT's competition here
BFS vs ROIC Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check ROIC's competition here
BFS vs GTY Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while GTY trades at $32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check GTY's competition here
BFS vs ADC-PA Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while ADC-PA trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check ADC-PA's competition here
BFS vs NTST Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while NTST trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is 163.50. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check NTST's competition here
BFS vs ALEX Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while ALEX trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check ALEX's competition here
BFS vs CBL Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while CBL trades at $47.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check CBL's competition here
BFS vs ALX Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while ALX trades at $250.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 62.94. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check ALX's competition here
BFS vs RPT-PD Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check RPT-PD's competition here
BFS vs WSR Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 977.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while WSR trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check WSR's competition here
BFS vs UBP Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check UBP's competition here
BFS vs UBA Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check UBA's competition here
BFS vs UBP-PK Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check UBP-PK's competition here
BFS vs BFS-PD Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 784.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while BFS-PD trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check BFS-PD's competition here
BFS vs UBP-PH Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check UBP-PH's competition here
BFS vs BFS-PE Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 540.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while BFS-PE trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check BFS-PE's competition here
BFS vs RVI Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 524.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while RVI trades at $43.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -49.46. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check RVI's competition here
BFS vs SITC-PA Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check SITC-PA's competition here
BFS vs PINE Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 314.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while PINE trades at $19.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is -237.81. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check PINE's competition here
BFS vs CDR-PC Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 273.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while CDR-PC trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check CDR-PC's competition here
BFS vs CDR-PB Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 270.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while CDR-PB trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check CDR-PB's competition here
BFS vs SITC Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 256.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while SITC trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check SITC's competition here
BFS vs SRG Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 156.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while SRG trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check SRG's competition here
BFS vs SRG-PA Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 150.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while SRG-PA trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -11.71. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check SRG-PA's competition here
BFS vs WHLRL Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while WHLRL trades at $82.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -44.16. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check WHLRL's competition here
BFS vs WHLRP Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while WHLRP trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check WHLRP's competition here
BFS vs WHLRD Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while WHLRD trades at $37.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -20.09. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check WHLRD's competition here
BFS vs WHLR Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 61.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while WHLR trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check WHLR's competition here
BFS vs WRI Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check WRI's competition here
BFS vs PEI Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEI's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check PEI's competition here
BFS vs PEI-PC Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check PEI-PC's competition here
BFS vs PEI-PB Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check PEI-PB's competition here
BFS vs PEI-PD Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check PEI-PD's competition here
BFS vs BPYU Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check BPYU's competition here
BFS vs WPG Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check WPG's competition here
BFS vs NNN-PF Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check NNN-PF's competition here
BFS vs HMG Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check HMG's competition here
BFS vs EQY Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, EQY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while EQY trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas EQY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to EQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check EQY's competition here
BFS vs BPYUP Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check BPYUP's competition here
BFS vs CDR Comparison June 2026
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 867.1M. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $35.30, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.35, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check CDR's competition here